Muzanya-Danie Sisya v Maitwa (SCZ 8 319 of 1999) [2001] ZMSC 104 (12 April 2001)

Muzanya-Danie Sisya v Maitwa (SCZ 8 319 of 1999) [2001] ZMSC 104 (12 April 2001)

An appeal has no merit where the debt is admitted and no proper appeal is pending; thus, a stay of execution should not be granted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] ZMSC 104
Parties
Appellant: Muzanya-Danie Sisya; Respondent: Malina Maitwa
Court
Supreme Court of Zambia
Jurisdiction
Zambia
Case Number
SCZ 8 319 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Admission of Debt, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Debt Recovery Stay of Execution Admission of Debt Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muzanya-Danie Sisya

Appellant

Malina Maitwa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted when the debt is admitted
  2. 2 Whether there is merit in an appeal where the debt is admitted

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal has no merit where the debt is admitted and no proper appeal is pending; thus, a stay of execution should not be granted.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant to pay costs