Thomas Owusu & 142 Others v The Attorney General (Appeal 53 of 2011) [2015] ZMSC 76 (13 May 2015)

Thomas Owusu & 142 Others v The Attorney General (Appeal 53 of 2011) [2015] ZMSC 76 (13 May 2015)

The reference to Circular B3 of 1965 in the judgment dated 14th February, 2014 was a slip of the pen; the correct circular for computation is Circular No. B9 of 1985 as stated in the main judgment dated 9th April, 2008.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] ZMSC 76
Parties
Appellants: Thomas Owusu and 142 Others; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Supreme Court of Zambia
Jurisdiction
Zambia
Case Number
Appeal 53 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Motion for Interpretation
Outcome
motion allowed
Legal Topics
Judgment Interpretation, Baggage Allowance Computation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judgment Interpretation Baggage Allowance Computation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Owusu and 142 Others

Appellants

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Judgment Motion for Interpretation

  1. 1 Whether the reference to Circular B3 of 1965 in the judgment dated 14th February, 2014 was correct
  2. 2 Which circular should be used to compute the appellants' baggage allowance

Ratio Decidendi

The reference to Circular B3 of 1965 in the judgment dated 14th February, 2014 was a slip of the pen; the correct circular for computation is Circular No. B9 of 1985 as stated in the main judgment dated 9th April, 2008.

Court Disposition

motion allowed

Orders

  • The motion for interpretation is allowed.
  • The appellants' baggage allowance should be computed pursuant to Circular No. B9 of 1985.