S v Sando (CA 363 of 2007) [2007] ZWHHC 46 (13 June 2007)
The conviction was set aside because it was based solely on the uncorroborated evidence of an accomplice, contrary to section 270 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, and the accomplice was not warned. The prosecution failed to prove the commission of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- [2007] ZWHHC 46
- Parties
- Appellant: Angirayi Sando; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2007
- Case Number
- CA 363 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Accomplice Evidence, Appeals, Corroboration of Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angirayi Sando
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction could stand on the uncorroborated evidence of an accomplice
- 2 Whether the failure to warn the accomplice witness was a fatal irregularity
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved the commission of the offence beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was set aside because it was based solely on the uncorroborated evidence of an accomplice, contrary to section 270 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, and the accomplice was not warned. The prosecution failed to prove the commission of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.
Orders
- Conviction and sentence set aside
- Appellant found not guilty and acquitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment