S v Kumisai (CRB 131 of 2015; HH 176 of 2016) [2016] ZWHHC 176 (4 March 2016)

S v Kumisai (CRB 131 of 2015; HH 176 of 2016) [2016] ZWHHC 176 (4 March 2016)

The applicant failed to provide concrete proof of changed circumstances justifying bail, and the risk of abscondment remains high.

Citation
[2016] ZWHHC 176
Parties
Applicant: Christopher Kumisai; Respondent: The State
Court
Harare High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
4 March 2016
Case Number
CRB 131 of 2015 ; HH 176 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Fraud, Changed Circumstances
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Kumisai

Applicant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether there are changed circumstances warranting the granting of bail to the applicant under s 116 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide concrete proof of changed circumstances justifying bail, and the risk of abscondment remains high.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bail is dismissed.