S v Gardner (B 920 of 2008) [2008] ZWHHC 60 (21 July 2008)
The trial court misdirected itself by considering only prospects of success and not other relevant factors. The applicant has shown that, due to likely delays in hearing the appeal and the short sentence, it is not in the interests of justice to deny bail. The risk of abscondment is not established merely by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] ZWHHC 60
- Parties
- Applicant: David Edward Gardner; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2008
- Case Number
- B 920 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; bail granted.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Prospects of Success, Risk of Abscondment, Interests of Justice
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Edward Gardner
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred in refusing bail pending appeal by failing to consider all relevant factors
- 2 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient grounds for admission to bail pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court misdirected itself by considering only prospects of success and not other relevant factors. The applicant has shown that, due to likely delays in hearing the appeal and the short sentence, it is not in the interests of justice to deny bail. The risk of abscondment is not established merely by the applicant's nationality. The appeal succeeds.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; bail granted.
Orders
- The appellant is admitted to bail.
- The appellant is to deposit the sum of $5 trillion with the Clerk of Court, Harare Magistrates court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment