Deysel and Ors v Constituency Registrar (HCA 20 of 2002) [2002] ZWBHC 24 (7 March 2002)
Loss of citizenship leads to automatic loss of voting rights by operation of law, and procedural requirements for removal from the voters' roll do not apply in such cases.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] ZWBHC 24
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Deysel and Others; Respondent: The Constituency Registrar
- Court
- Bulawayo High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Case Number
- HCA 20 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- declaratory order
- Legal Topics
- Citizenship, Right to Vote, Applicability of Electorate Act
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Deysel and Others
Appellant
The Constituency Registrar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether loss of citizenship results in loss of right to vote by operation of law
- 2 Whether the procedures in section 25 of the Electorate Act are applicable where citizenship is lost
Ratio Decidendi
Loss of citizenship leads to automatic loss of voting rights by operation of law, and procedural requirements for removal from the voters' roll do not apply in such cases.
Court Disposition
declaratory order
Orders
- Any person including the appellants are entitled to vote in the Presidential Elections set for the 9th and 10th March 2002 provided they can prove to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of Elections that at the relevant time they are citizens of Zimbabwe and meet the eligibility criteria.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment No. HB 24/2002 Case No. HCA 20/2002 JOSEPH DEYSEL AND OTHERS versus THE CONSTITUENCY REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE CHIWESHE J BULAWAYO 8 MARCH 2002 CHIWESHE J: In this appeal I am of the view that the matters referred to me by the magistrates’ concerned are points of law - primarily the relevance/applicability of the provisions of the Electorate Act to the appellants’ cases. These have been inter alia raised by the appellants as points in limine. I have three options: - - - Decide on the points in limine and refer the matter back to the magistrates’ court. Decide the matter both on the points in limine and the merits immediately. make a declaratory order as to the law applicable. Given the urgency of the matter and the time constraints I prefer to adopt the third option. In this regard I am guided by the ruling in the case of Registrar-General of Elections and Others vs Morgan Tsvangirai SC 12/2002 in which it was held at pages 23 and 30 of the cyclostyled judgment, respectively, that; “Where the loss of citizenship is common cause, the consequent loss of the right to vote is by operation of the law making the procedures set out in section 25 of the Act superfluous or non-applicable. In such cases the constituency registrar, or anybody else for that matter, cannot matter. The right to vote by any way.” and reverse such a loss nor does he have any discretion in the law has taken its course, the voter has lost his or her operation of the law and the loss cannot be revived in -2- 24/02 “(4) That, by a majority of four to one, a person who ceases to be a citizen also ceases to be a voter by operation of law namely paragraph 3(3) of the Third Schedule of the Constitution of Zimbabwe”. Declaration Any person including the appellants are entitled to vote in the Presidential Elections set for the 9th and 10th March 2002 provided that they can prove to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of Elections that at the relevant time they are citizens of Zimbabwe and that they meet the criteria set down for eligibility as a voter in the said elections. Chiweshe J