S v Manyimo (CA 606 of 2015; HH 400 of 2016) [2016] ZWHHC 400 (13 July 2016)

S v Manyimo (CA 606 of 2015; HH 400 of 2016) [2016] ZWHHC 400 (13 July 2016)

The appellant misrepresented the shareholding and directorship status to the complainant, did so with intent to deceive, and caused financial prejudice. The conviction and sentence, including restitution, were proper.

Citation
[2016] ZWHHC 400
Parties
Appellant: Fortunate Manyimo; Respondent: The State
Court
Harare High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
13 July 2016
Case Number
CA 606 of 2015 ; HH 400 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fraud, Restitution, Shareholding, Misrepresentation
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Fraud Restitution Shareholding Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fortunate Manyimo

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant misrepresented facts to the complainant regarding shareholding and directorship
  2. 2 Whether the complainant suffered prejudice as a result of the misrepresentation
  3. 3 Whether the conviction for fraud was proper

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant misrepresented the shareholding and directorship status to the complainant, did so with intent to deceive, and caused financial prejudice. The conviction and sentence, including restitution, were proper.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence upheld
  • Restitution order confirmed