Taylor v Taylor (HB 58 of 2007) [2007] ZWBHC 58 (30 May 2007)
The donation was a simple donation, not remuneratory. Donations between spouses are revocable even after delivery, and gross ingratitude was established by the respondent's conduct. Even absent gross ingratitude, the law allows revocation of such donations without proof of cause.
- Citation
- [2007] ZWBHC 58
- Parties
- Applicant: Heather Margaret Taylor; Respondent: Michael Taylor
- Court
- Bulawayo High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2007
- Case Number
- HB 58 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Opposed Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Donation, Donations Between Spouses, Gross Ingratitude, Property Transfer
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heather Margaret Taylor
Applicant
Michael Taylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Opposed Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the donation was a simple or remuneratory donation
- 2 Whether a donation can be revoked after delivery
- 3 Whether valid legal grounds exist for revocation of the donation, specifically gross ingratitude
Ratio Decidendi
The donation was a simple donation, not remuneratory. Donations between spouses are revocable even after delivery, and gross ingratitude was established by the respondent's conduct. Even absent gross ingratitude, the law allows revocation of such donations without proof of cause.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant’s revocation of her donation to respondent of Lot 2 of subdivision 1 of stand 185 of Matsheumhlophe, Bulawayo is confirmed.
- Respondent is ordered to effect transfer of the property to applicant within 14 days of service of this order or immediately upon being called upon by conveyancers, failing which the Deputy Sheriff is authorised to sign all documents in his place and stead.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment