S v Hewit & Ors (B 914 of 2015) [2015] ZWHHC 824 (20 October 2015)
The appellants are not proper candidates for bail as they are a flight risk, having been arrested while attempting to leave Zimbabwe through an illegal point of exit. The lower court did not misdirect itself in denying bail, and the state case is strong, especially for counts 1 and 2.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 824
- Parties
- Appellant: Hewit Edwin; Appellant: Pretorius Herbert John; Appellant: Blignaut Henrick Johannes; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2015
- Case Number
- B 914 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Appeal / Appeal Against Denial of Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Flight Risk, Smuggling, Illegal Export, Permit Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hewit Edwin
Appellant
Pretorius Herbert John
Appellant
Blignaut Henrick Johannes
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Appeal / Appeal Against Denial of Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants should be granted bail pending trial
- 2 Whether the appellants are a flight risk
- 3 Whether the lower court misdirected itself in denying bail
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants are not proper candidates for bail as they are a flight risk, having been arrested while attempting to leave Zimbabwe through an illegal point of exit. The lower court did not misdirect itself in denying bail, and the state case is strong, especially for counts 1 and 2.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Bail appeal is dismissed for lack of merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment