Musemwa and Ors v Estate, Misheck Tapomwa & Ors (HC 5247 of 2015; HC 5248 of 2015; HC 5626 of 2015; HC 6031 of 2015; HH 136 of 2016) [2016] ZWHHC 136 (14 January 2016)
The third and fourth defendants acted solely as agents for a disclosed principal and were not parties to the contract of sale. No cause of action lies against them for specific performance or reimbursement. Trusts may sue in their own name under the rules, but no valid claim is disclosed against the estate agents.
- Citation
- [2016] ZWHHC 136
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ignatious Musemwa; Plaintiff: The Muvuri Investment Trust; Plaintiff: Bismarck C Mupundu; Plaintiff: Farai Musarurwa; Plaintiff: Adaarewa Henry Mandibaya; Plaintiff: Susan Netsai Matura; Plaintiff: Madenya Family Trust; Plaintiff: William H Samanyandwe; Plaintiff: Gwinya Family Trust; Defendant: Estate Late Mischeck Tapomwa; Defendant: Shingirayi Tapomwa; Defendant: CB Richard Ellis (Pvt) Limited; Defendant: Dawn Properties Limited
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2016
- Case Number
- HC 5247 of 2015 ; HC 5248 of 2015 ; HC 5626 of 2015 ; HC 6031 of 2015 ; HH 136 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Exception
- Outcome
- exception upheld, claims dismissed against third and fourth defendants
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi of Trusts, Liability of Agents, Joinder of Parties, Specific Performance, Restitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ignatious Musemwa
Plaintiff
The Muvuri Investment Trust
Plaintiff
Bismarck C Mupundu
Plaintiff
Farai Musarurwa
Plaintiff
Adaarewa Henry Mandibaya
Plaintiff
Susan Netsai Matura
Plaintiff
Madenya Family Trust
Plaintiff
William H Samanyandwe
Plaintiff
Gwinya Family Trust
Plaintiff
Estate Late Mischeck Tapomwa
Defendant
Shingirayi Tapomwa
Defendant
CB Richard Ellis (Pvt) Limited
Defendant
Dawn Properties Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Exception
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a trust has locus standi to sue in its own name under Zimbabwean law
- 2 Whether estate agents (third and fourth defendants) can be held liable in contract for acts done as agents
- 3 Whether specific performance or reimbursement can be ordered against agents not party to the contract
Ratio Decidendi
The third and fourth defendants acted solely as agents for a disclosed principal and were not parties to the contract of sale. No cause of action lies against them for specific performance or reimbursement. Trusts may sue in their own name under the rules, but no valid claim is disclosed against the estate agents.
Court Disposition
exception upheld, claims dismissed against third and fourth defendants
Orders
- The third and fourth defendants' exception is upheld.
- The plaintiffs’ claims against the third and fourth defendants are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment