S v Mafume (9 of 2021) [2021] ZWHHC 9 (15 January 2021)
The lower court grossly misdirected itself by refusing bail in the absence of evidence, even on a balance of probabilities, that the appellant interfered with the state witness. Allegations alone, without supporting evidence, do not meet the constitutional threshold for denying bail.
- Citation
- [2021] ZWHHC 9
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacob Mafume; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2021 30 December 2021 15 January 2021
- Case Number
- 9 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Interference With Witnesses, Presumption of Innocence, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacob Mafume
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court misdirected itself in finding that the appellant interfered with a state witness on a balance of probabilities
- 2 Whether compelling reasons existed to deny bail under the Constitution
- 3 Whether the presumption of innocence was eroded by the lower court's approach
Ratio Decidendi
The lower court grossly misdirected itself by refusing bail in the absence of evidence, even on a balance of probabilities, that the appellant interfered with the state witness. Allegations alone, without supporting evidence, do not meet the constitutional threshold for denying bail.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; bail granted
Orders
- The appeal against the refusal of bail is allowed.
- The decision of the Magistrates Court refusing bail is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment