S v Makamba (HH 38 of 2004) [2004] ZWHHC 38 (14 February 2004)
The applicant was detained under section 32 of the Act as amended by the Regulations, which expressly prohibit any court from granting bail for the specified period for the offences charged. The Regulations lawfully override section 116 and the court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail.
- Citation
- [2004] ZWHHC 38
- Parties
- Applicant: James Makamba; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2004
- Case Number
- HH 38 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Chamber Application for Bail / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Exchange Control Offences, Presidential Powers, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Makamba
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Chamber Application for Bail / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully placed on remand under section 32 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act as amended by the Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Regulations, 2004
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant bail in light of the amended section 32
- 3 Whether the Regulations lawfully amended an Act of Parliament and override section 116 of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was detained under section 32 of the Act as amended by the Regulations, which expressly prohibit any court from granting bail for the specified period for the offences charged. The Regulations lawfully override section 116 and the court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for bail is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment