S v Gissi (CON 114 of 2015; HH 142 of 2016) [2015] ZWHHC 142 (14 September 2015)
The application for condonation was dismissed because there was no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no prospects of success on appeal against conviction or sentence, as the evidence against the applicant was clear and the sentence appropriate.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 142
- Parties
- Respondent: The State; Applicant: Maxwell Gissi
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2015 14 September 2015 9 February 2015
- Case Number
- CON 114 of 2015 ; HH 142 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Chamber Application for Condonation for Late Noting of Appeal and Leave to Prosecute Appeal in Person
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Condonation for Late Appeal, Leave to Prosecute Appeal in Person, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Respondent
Maxwell Gissi
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Chamber Application for Condonation for Late Noting of Appeal and Leave to Prosecute Appeal in Person
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation for late noting of appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether leave to prosecute appeal in person should be granted
- 3 Whether there are prospects of success on appeal against conviction and sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The application for condonation was dismissed because there was no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no prospects of success on appeal against conviction or sentence, as the evidence against the applicant was clear and the sentence appropriate.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for condonation for late noting of appeal is dismissed.
- Leave to prosecute appeal in person is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment