S v Kachigamba & Anor (B 215 of 2015) [2015] ZWHHC 358 (9 April 2015)
The appeal was improperly before the court as it was based on new facts not placed before the magistrate; the proper procedure is to make a fresh application before the magistrate based on those new facts.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 358
- Parties
- Appellant: Mike Kachigamba; Appellant: Marko Makambo; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 9 April 2015
- Case Number
- B 215 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- appeal struck off the roll
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Burden of Proof, Right to Liberty, Judicial Duty to Unrepresented Accused, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mike Kachigamba
Appellant
Marko Makambo
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate erred in refusing bail without calling for evidence or affording the unrepresented accused an opportunity to rebut the State's allegations
- 2 Whether new facts can be introduced for the first time on appeal in bail proceedings
- 3 Whether the presiding magistrate fulfilled the duty to assist unrepresented accused persons
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was improperly before the court as it was based on new facts not placed before the magistrate; the proper procedure is to make a fresh application before the magistrate based on those new facts.
Court Disposition
appeal struck off the roll
Orders
- The appeal is struck off the roll.
- The matter is referred back to the magistrate’s court for bail consideration on the basis of new facts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment