Chikodzi (nee Dhlakama) v Chikodzi (HC 11433 of 2017; HH 330 of 2020) [2020] ZWHHC 330 (28 May 2020)
Both parties contributed directly and indirectly to the acquisition and development of the matrimonial property during a long marriage; a just and equitable distribution is an equal share in the immovable property, with the defendant given first option to buy out the plaintiff. The quantum of maintenance for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] ZWHHC 330
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Modest Chikodzi (nee Dhlakama); Defendant: Bigbrain Chikodzi
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2020
- Case Number
- HC 11433 of 2017 ; HH 330 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Action / Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree of divorce granted; custody of minor child to plaintiff; maintenance set at USD 500 per month; equal division of matrimonial house; movables distributed as per consent paper; each party to bear own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Child Custody, Child Maintenance, Costs
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Modest Chikodzi (nee Dhlakama)
Plaintiff
Bigbrain Chikodzi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Divorce Action / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down and a decree of divorce should be granted
- 2 What is the just and equitable distribution of the matrimonial property known as Stand 2148 Highgate Close, Glen Lorne, Harare
- 3 What is the appropriate quantum of maintenance for the minor child
Ratio Decidendi
Both parties contributed directly and indirectly to the acquisition and development of the matrimonial property during a long marriage; a just and equitable distribution is an equal share in the immovable property, with the defendant given first option to buy out the plaintiff. The quantum of maintenance for the minor child is set at USD 500 per month, as the plaintiff failed to justify a higher amount and the defendant has been providing for the child's needs.
Court Disposition
Decree of divorce granted; custody of minor child to plaintiff; maintenance set at USD 500 per month; equal division of matrimonial house; movables distributed as per consent paper; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- A decree of divorce is granted.
- Custody of the minor child, X, born 8th December 2009, is awarded to the plaintiff; defendant granted reasonable rights of access.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment