Kazingizi v Samuel & Ors (HC 707 of 2014) [2015] ZWHHC 317 (26 March 2015)
The defendants had no legal right to remain on the farm as they lacked any permit, offer letter, or lease, and the plaintiff's offer letter was valid and conferred exclusive occupation rights; thus, the plaintiff was entitled to evict the defendants.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 317
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Penias Kazingiz; Defendant: Jonas Samuel; Defendant: Cleopas Mudzimu; Defendant: Chrispen Chipinga; Defendant: Tawanda Museredza; Defendant: Oliver Kaseke; Defendant: Enet Jimu; Defendant: Nashington Kambangu; Defendant: Mareta Mostaff; Defendant: Kenias Matemayaka; Defendant: Sabora Sabora; Defendant: Trust Mudzinga; Defendant: Aron Simon; Defendant: Julius Museredza; Defendant: Trymore Chimupaka; Defendant: Getrude Simende; Defendant: Shorai Kwangwari; Seventeenth Defendant: Minister of Lands, Land Reform and Rural Resettlement
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2015
- Case Number
- HC 707 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Pre Trial Conference and Final Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for eviction granted with transitional arrangements.
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Offer Letter Validity, Occupation of Agricultural Land, Land Reform, Pre Trial Conference Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Penias Kazingiz
Plaintiff
Jonas Samuel
Defendant
Cleopas Mudzimu
Defendant
Chrispen Chipinga
Defendant
Tawanda Museredza
Defendant
Oliver Kaseke
Defendant
Enet Jimu
Defendant
Nashington Kambangu
Defendant
Mareta Mostaff
Defendant
Kenias Matemayaka
Defendant
Sabora Sabora
Defendant
Trust Mudzinga
Defendant
Aron Simon
Defendant
Julius Museredza
Defendant
Trymore Chimupaka
Defendant
Getrude Simende
Defendant
Shorai Kwangwari
Defendant
Minister of Lands, Land Reform and Rural Resettlement
Seventeenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Pre Trial Conference and Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants have legal right to remain on the farm after issuance of an offer letter to the plaintiff
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to evict the defendants from the farm
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants had no legal right to remain on the farm as they lacked any permit, offer letter, or lease, and the plaintiff's offer letter was valid and conferred exclusive occupation rights; thus, the plaintiff was entitled to evict the defendants.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for eviction granted with transitional arrangements.
Orders
- Defendants allowed to remain on the farm up to 17 April 2015.
- Defendants may negotiate with plaintiff to become his workers in the interim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment