S v Konzo (CRB 791 of 2012) [2015] ZWHHC 233 (19 January 2015)

S v Konzo (CRB 791 of 2012) [2015] ZWHHC 233 (19 January 2015)

The items taken by the appellant were an integral part of the plant sold to the complainant; the appellant's actions constituted theft and not a civil dispute; the sentence required alteration due to improper restitution order and lack of reasons for sentence.

Citation
[2015] ZWHHC 233
Parties
Appellant: Peter Danger Konzo; Respondent: The State
Court
Harare High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
19 January 2015
Case Number
CRB 791 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence altered
Legal Topics
Theft, Sentencing, Restitution, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Theft Sentencing Restitution Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Danger Konzo

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the items allegedly stolen were part of the plant sold to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the matter was civil or criminal in nature
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The items taken by the appellant were an integral part of the plant sold to the complainant; the appellant's actions constituted theft and not a civil dispute; the sentence required alteration due to improper restitution order and lack of reasons for sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence altered

Orders

  • Conviction upheld
  • Sentence amended to 12 months imprisonment of which 6 months suspended for 5 years on condition of no offence involving dishonesty