S v Mushipe & Ors (CRB B 605 of 2015) [2015] ZWHHC 649 (20 July 2015)
First and second applicants are denied bail due to the seriousness of the offence, strong evidence linking them to the crime, risk of abscondment, and previous evasion of arrest. Third and fourth applicants are granted bail as there is insufficient evidence directly linking them to the offence and no risk of abscondment is established.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 649
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Mushipe; Applicant: Master Katsanza; Applicant: Killian Shonhiwa Tagarira; Applicant: Vestor Maretekwa; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2015
- Case Number
- CRB B 605 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail granted in part, denied in part
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Robbery, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Mushipe
Applicant
Master Katsanza
Applicant
Killian Shonhiwa Tagarira
Applicant
Vestor Maretekwa
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted bail pending trial
- 2 Whether there is a risk of abscondment or interference with investigations
Ratio Decidendi
First and second applicants are denied bail due to the seriousness of the offence, strong evidence linking them to the crime, risk of abscondment, and previous evasion of arrest. Third and fourth applicants are granted bail as there is insufficient evidence directly linking them to the offence and no risk of abscondment is established.
Court Disposition
bail granted in part, denied in part
Orders
- Bail application for first and second applicants is dismissed.
- Third and fourth applicants are admitted to bail pending trial on conditions: deposit US$100 each with Clerk of Court, reside at specified addresses, report weekly to police, and not interfere with witnesses or evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment