Sole v Kazi (HC 6559 of 2005) [2006] ZWHHC 113 (12 September 2006)

Sole v Kazi (HC 6559 of 2005) [2006] ZWHHC 113 (12 September 2006)

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent was a debtor as defined by the Act or that he committed an act of insolvency. Payments were made to companies, not the respondent, and there was no evidence justifying lifting the corporate veil. The application did not meet the statutory requirements for provisional sequestration.

Citation
[2006] ZWHHC 113
Parties
Applicant: Prime Sole; Respondent: Munir Kazi
Court
Harare High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
12 September 2006 31 October 2006 12 September 2006
Case Number
HC 6559 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Opposed Court Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Provisional Sequestration, Acts of Insolvency, Corporate Veil, Debtor Definition
Source Language
English
Insolvency Law Provisional Sequestration Acts of Insolvency Corporate Veil Debtor Definition

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prime Sole

Applicant

Munir Kazi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Opposed Court Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent committed an act of insolvency under section 11(f) of the Insolvency Act
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is a debtor as defined by the Insolvency Act
  3. 3 Whether sequestration would be to the advantage of creditors

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent was a debtor as defined by the Act or that he committed an act of insolvency. Payments were made to companies, not the respondent, and there was no evidence justifying lifting the corporate veil. The application did not meet the statutory requirements for provisional sequestration.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs.