S v Mazorodze (Criminal Appeal 77 of 1984; SC 102 of 1984) [1984] ZWSC 102 (30 October 1984)

S v Mazorodze (Criminal Appeal 77 of 1984; SC 102 of 1984) [1984] ZWSC 102 (30 October 1984)

The appellant was properly convicted of arson as the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that the hut belonged to the complainant, was constructed by her with her own resources, and the appellant set it on fire intentionally to injure her property.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1984] ZWSC 102
Parties
Appellant: Robwell Mazorodze; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Zimbabwe
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
30 October 1984
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 77 of 1984 ; SC 102 of 1984
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Conviction and sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Arson, Ownership of Property, Sentencing
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Arson Ownership of Property Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robwell Mazorodze

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was properly convicted of arson
  2. 2 Whether the property destroyed belonged to the complainant or the appellant
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was properly convicted of arson as the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that the hut belonged to the complainant, was constructed by her with her own resources, and the appellant set it on fire intentionally to injure her property.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence upheld