S v Choruma (Crim. Appeal 430 of 1984; SC 50 of 1985) [1985] ZWSC 50 (3 June 1985)
The appeal was struck from the roll due to the late filing of heads of argument, as no good cause was shown for the breach of court rules. However, the appellant's bail was not cancelled because the fault did not lie with him or his advocate.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1985] ZWSC 50
- Parties
- Appellant: Antioch Choruma; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zimbabwe
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Case Number
- Crim. Appeal 430 of 1984 ; SC 50 of 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application to Strike Appeal From Roll and Cancel Bail Due to Late Filing of Heads of Argument
- Outcome
- Appeal struck from the roll; bail maintained temporarily.
- Legal Topics
- Late Filing of Heads of Argument, Bail, Court Rules Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antioch Choruma
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application to Strike Appeal From Roll and Cancel Bail Due to Late Filing of Heads of Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be struck from the roll due to late filing of heads of argument
- 2 Whether the appellant's bail should be cancelled for the same reason
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck from the roll due to the late filing of heads of argument, as no good cause was shown for the breach of court rules. However, the appellant's bail was not cancelled because the fault did not lie with him or his advocate.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck from the roll; bail maintained temporarily.
Orders
- Appeal struck from today's roll.
- Appellant's bail to stand until 17 June 1985 to allow application for re-instatement of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
DISTRIBUTABLE (29) Judgment No. S. C. 50/85 Crim. Appeal No. 430/84 ANTIOCK CHORUMA v THE STATE SUPREME COURT OF ZIMBABWE, BECK, JA, GUBBAY, JA & McNALLY, JA, HARARE, JUNE 3, 1985. M. J. Gillespie, for the appellant F. S. Chambakare, for the respondent BECK, JA: In this matter the State has applied for. the appeal to be struck from the roll and for the appellant's bail to be cancelled because the appellant’s Heads of Argument were filed five days late. The facts are that Mr Gillespie, who appears for the appellant, was only briefed on the very day that the appellant’s Heads of Argument should have been filed, and even then the record that accompanied his brief was incomplete in material respects. The fault, therefore, does not lie with him. Nor does the fault lie with the appellant. It appears to lie with Mr Gillespie’s instructing legal practitioner, who, due to an oversight, failed to instruct Mr Gillespie timeously. In these circumstances we are not prepared to accede to the request of State counsel that the appellant’s bail be cancelled. On the other hand, we are also not prepared to condone the breach of this Court’s rules, for which no good cause has been shown. It is moreover a breach of a kind that has become distressingly frequent to the great inconvenience of the Court and of the Attorney-General. S. C. 50/85 Accordingly the appeal is struck from today’s roll. The appellants bail will stand until 17 June 1985 to enable an application to be made before that date for the re-instatement of the appeal to the roll. Failing such application within the time allowed, the appeal will automatically be dismissed. The costs of making any such application for re-instatement are not to be charged to the appellant. GUBBAY, JA; I agree. McNALLY, JA; I agree. Stumbles & Rowe, appellant's legal representatives