S v Moyo (NY 569 of 2004) [2004] ZWBHC 142 (8 December 2004)
The sentence of 9 months imprisonment for indecent assault was disturbingly lenient given the serious nature of the offence, the age difference, and the trauma inflicted on the juvenile complainant. An effective sentence of three to five years imprisonment would have been appropriate.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] ZWBHC 142
- Parties
- Prosecution: The State; Accused: Phelamandla Moyo
- Court
- Bulawayo High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Case Number
- NY 569 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Convictions confirmed; sentence on count 2 (common assault) confirmed; sentence on count 1 (indecent assault) not certified as being in accordance with true and substantial justice.
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Common Assault, Sentencing, Sexual Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecution
Phelamandla Moyo
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for indecent assault was appropriate given the circumstances
- 2 Whether the convictions were proper
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 9 months imprisonment for indecent assault was disturbingly lenient given the serious nature of the offence, the age difference, and the trauma inflicted on the juvenile complainant. An effective sentence of three to five years imprisonment would have been appropriate.
Court Disposition
Convictions confirmed; sentence on count 2 (common assault) confirmed; sentence on count 1 (indecent assault) not certified as being in accordance with true and substantial justice.
Orders
- Convictions on both charges confirmed.
- Sentence on count 2 confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment No. HB 142/04 Case No. HC 4461/04 CRB NO. NY 569/04 THE STATE Versus PHELAMANDLA MOYO IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE NDOU J BULAWAYO 9 DECEMBER 2004 Criminal Review NDOU J: The accused was aged 32 at the time of the offence. He was charged and subsequently convicted of two charges, one of indecent assault and the other of common assault at Nyamandlovu Magistrates’ Court. Nothing turns on the convictions and I confirm them. On the count of indecent assault he was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment and on the assault common 6 months imprisonment. The facts reveal that the complainant was a juvenile aged 15 years at the time of the sexual abuse. The age difference between the accused and the complainant is around 17 years. The two are cousins and stayed in the same homestead. They shared the bedroom. The accused came home from a beer drink and found the complainant already asleep. The accused reduced himself to nudity and joined the complainant in bed. Later he pulled the complainant towards him resulting in the latter’s pants being torn. The accused then pressed his erect male organ against the complainant’s buttocks and legs, indulging in a sexual act. The complainant woke up and demanded to know what the accused was doing. The accused stopped for a while and later repeated the act resulting in the complainant breaking free and running out of the hut in the middle of the night and seek refuge with their neighbours. The following day the complainant returned home and the accused assaulted him for HB 142/04 making a report to the neighbours. I have no qualms with the sentence on the charge of assault common. Although it appears severe it is within the sentencing discretion of the trial magistrate. The sentence on the charge of indecent assault is disturbingly inappropriate. It is very lenient. This s a serious form of sexual abuse. Sexual abuse of boys is on the increase. The accused came very close to achieving non-consensual sexual intercourse per anum with this juvenile. This was unprotected intercourse. This type of conduct exposes children to untold trauma and incurable diseases. The moral blameworthiness of the accused is very high and I consider an effective sentence in the region of three to five years imprisonment as being appropriate – S v Katson HH-285-85 and S v Ndlovu HB-66-03. Accordingly, I confirm the convictions on both charges. I also confirm the sentence imposed on count 2. I am, however, unable to certify the sentence imposed in count 1 as being in accordance with true and substantial justice.