S v Munga (CRB 70 of 2000) [2003] ZWBHC 68 (22 May 2003)

S v Munga (CRB 70 of 2000) [2003] ZWBHC 68 (22 May 2003)

The accused was not suffering from insanity or diminished responsibility, nor did he establish non-pathological incapacity; he was criminally responsible for the murder of his wife and acted with legal intent.

Citation
[2003] ZWBHC 68
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Bleya Munga
Court
Bulawayo High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Judgment Date
22 May 2003
Case Number
CRB 70 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
guilty of murder with constructive intent
Legal Topics
Murder, Criminal Responsibility, Insanity Defence, Diminished Responsibility, Non Pathological Incapacity
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Murder Criminal Responsibility Insanity Defence Diminished Responsibility Non Pathological Incapacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Bleya Munga

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused was criminally responsible for the death of his wife
  2. 2 Whether the accused was suffering from insanity or diminished responsibility at the time of the offence
  3. 3 Whether the accused could rely on non-pathological criminal incapacity as a defence

Ratio Decidendi

The accused was not suffering from insanity or diminished responsibility, nor did he establish non-pathological incapacity; he was criminally responsible for the murder of his wife and acted with legal intent.

Court Disposition

guilty of murder with constructive intent