S v Tsvangirai (HH 169 of 2004) [2004] ZWHHC 169 (14 October 2004)

S v Tsvangirai (HH 169 of 2004) [2004] ZWHHC 169 (14 October 2004)

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused solicited the assassination of President Mugabe or the staging of a military coup. The evidence, including the credibility of the main prosecution witness and the context of the meetings, was insufficient to support a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] ZWHHC 169
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Morgan Tsvangirai
Court
Harare High Court
Jurisdiction
Zimbabwe
Case Number
HH 169 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
Acquittal
Legal Topics
High Treason, Conspiracy, Attempted Assassination, Coup Plotting
Source Language
en
Criminal Law High Treason Conspiracy Attempted Assassination Coup Plotting

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Morgan Tsvangirai

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused solicited the assassination of President Mugabe and a military coup
  2. 2 Whether the evidence supports the charge of high treason against the accused

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused solicited the assassination of President Mugabe or the staging of a military coup. The evidence, including the credibility of the main prosecution witness and the context of the meetings, was insufficient to support a conviction for high treason.

Court Disposition

Acquittal

Orders

  • The accused is found not guilty and acquitted of the charge of high treason.