MUJURU v C.E.O AFRICA ROUNDTABLE (4 of 2026) [2026] ZWHHC 4 (2 January 2026)
The evidence did not support the finding that all money due under the Service Level Agreement was paid. The claim for USD 4500 was proven, but the claim for USD 1610.14 for extra expenses was not proven as there was no express approval from the respondent.
- Citation
- [2026] ZWHHC 4
- Parties
- Appellant: Simbarashe Mujuru; Respondent: C. E. O Africa Roundtable
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 2 January 2026
- Case Number
- 4 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Appeal partially succeeds
- Legal Topics
- Service Level Agreement, Remuneration for Services, Approval of Expenses, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simbarashe Mujuru
Appellant
C. E. O Africa Roundtable
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant was paid all money due under the Service Level Agreement
- 2 Whether there was a verbal contract between the parties
- 3 Whether respondent acknowledged indebtedness to appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not support the finding that all money due under the Service Level Agreement was paid. The claim for USD 4500 was proven, but the claim for USD 1610.14 for extra expenses was not proven as there was no express approval from the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal partially succeeds
Orders
- The judgment of the Court a quo is partially set aside.
- The claim of USD 4500 or the equivalent payable in Zimbabwean dollars at the prevailing interbank rate as at date of full and final payment is granted with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment