STREAMSPACE INCORPORATED (PVT) LTD Versus HAYES CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD And Others (53 of 2025) [2025] ZWHHC 53 (5 February 2025)
The opposing affidavit by first respondent was invalid as it was attested by a commissioner of oaths with an interest, rendering the opposition defective. The court was not functus officio as the prior order was interlocutory. The point of law was properly raised and the first respondent's defence is struck out; the matter proceeds against the remaining parties.
- Citation
- [2025] ZWHHC 53
- Parties
- Applicant: Streamspace Incorporated (Pvt) Ltd; First Respondent: Hayes Construction (Pvt) Ltd; Second Respondent: Linkgate Investments Pvt Ltd; Third Respondent: Grace Mugabe Foundation Trust; Fourth Respondent: Mazowe Rural District Council; Fifth Respondent: Provincial Town Planning Officer Mashonaland Central Province; Sixth Respondent: Ministry of Local Government Public Works and National Housing; Seventh Respondent: Minister of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2025
- Case Number
- 53 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application on a Point of Law / Ruling on Point of Law After Case Management Conference
- Outcome
- First respondent's defence struck out; matter to proceed against remaining parties; costs to first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Validity, Commissioner of Oaths, Functus Officio, Case Management, Conversion of Motion to Trial
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Streamspace Incorporated (Pvt) Ltd
Applicant
Hayes Construction (Pvt) Ltd
First Respondent
Linkgate Investments Pvt Ltd
Second Respondent
Grace Mugabe Foundation Trust
Third Respondent
Mazowe Rural District Council
Fourth Respondent
Provincial Town Planning Officer Mashonaland Central Province
Fifth Respondent
Ministry of Local Government Public Works and National Housing
Sixth Respondent
Minister of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application on a Point of Law / Ruling on Point of Law After Case Management Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an opposing affidavit commissioned by a legal practitioner with an interest is valid
- 2 Whether the court is functus officio after a conversion order
- 3 Proper procedure for raising a point of law during case management
Ratio Decidendi
The opposing affidavit by first respondent was invalid as it was attested by a commissioner of oaths with an interest, rendering the opposition defective. The court was not functus officio as the prior order was interlocutory. The point of law was properly raised and the first respondent's defence is struck out; the matter proceeds against the remaining parties.
Court Disposition
First respondent's defence struck out; matter to proceed against remaining parties; costs to first respondent.
Orders
- The point of law raised by applicant is upheld.
- First respondent's defence (notice of opposition) is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment