S v Chimhau (CRB 85 of 2015) [2016] ZWHHC 58 (12 January 2016)
The matter was removed from the roll because the State could not proceed in the absence of key witnesses, and only the court has authority to discharge the accused after proper procedure.
- Citation
- [2016] ZWHHC 58
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The State; Respondent: Eunice Chimhau
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2016
- Case Number
- CRB 85 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Application for Removal From the Roll
- Outcome
- Matter removed from the roll
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Trial Procedure, Court Administration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Parties
The State
Plaintiff
Eunice Chimhau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Application for Removal From the Roll
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the matter should be removed from the roll due to absence of key witnesses
- 2 Whether counsel had authority to discharge the accused without the court's direction
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was removed from the roll because the State could not proceed in the absence of key witnesses, and only the court has authority to discharge the accused after proper procedure.
Court Disposition
Matter removed from the roll
Orders
- The matter is struck off or removed from the roll.
- If the matter is to proceed, a fresh indictment and summons are required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment