S v Mhandu (B 592 of 2015) [2015] ZWHHC 644 (21 July 2015)
Given the seriousness and multiplicity of the charges, the strength of the State case, the applicant's proximity to the alleged offences and victims, and the risk of absconding and interference with witnesses, the applicant is not a suitable candidate for bail.
- Citation
- [2015] ZWHHC 644
- Parties
- Applicant: Tichaona Mhandu; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2015
- Case Number
- B 592 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Application for bail dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Robbery, Assault, Pre Trial Detention
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tichaona Mhandu
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending trial given the seriousness and multiplicity of the charges, risk of absconding, risk of committing further offences, and risk of interference with witnesses.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness and multiplicity of the charges, the strength of the State case, the applicant's proximity to the alleged offences and victims, and the risk of absconding and interference with witnesses, the applicant is not a suitable candidate for bail.
Court Disposition
Application for bail dismissed.
Orders
- Application for bail is hereby dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment