Ex Parte: ZIMASCO (Pvt) Ltd (For a Provisional Order placing it under judicial management and for the appointment of a Provisional Judicial Manager) (HC 12220 of 2015) [2016] ZWHHC 53 (13 January 2016)
An application for provisional judicial management under s 299(1)(a) of the Companies Act must be brought ex parte, with service only on the Master prior to filing with the court. Interested parties may not oppose at the initial stage; their rights to oppose arise only after the provisional order is granted. Non-compliance with the sequence of service under s 299(2) invalidates the application.
- Citation
- [2016] ZWHHC 53
- Parties
- Applicant: ZIMASCO (PRIVATE) LIMITED; Intervening Party: MBCA Bank Limited; Intervening Party: Nedbank Limited; Intervening Party: Stanbic Bank; Intervening Party: Central Africa Building Society
- Court
- Harare High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Zimbabwe
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2016
- Case Number
- HC 12220 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Provisional Judicial Management / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Management, Locus Standi, Procedure for Provisional Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ZIMASCO (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Applicant
MBCA Bank Limited
Intervening Party
Nedbank Limited
Intervening Party
Stanbic Bank
Intervening Party
Central Africa Building Society
Intervening Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Provisional Judicial Management / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interested parties can oppose an application for provisional judicial management before the provisional order is granted
- 2 Whether the applicant complied with the procedural requirements under s 299(2) of the Companies Act
Ratio Decidendi
An application for provisional judicial management under s 299(1)(a) of the Companies Act must be brought ex parte, with service only on the Master prior to filing with the court. Interested parties may not oppose at the initial stage; their rights to oppose arise only after the provisional order is granted. Non-compliance with the sequence of service under s 299(2) invalidates the application.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Notice of opposition by the 4 intervening banks expunged from the record
- The 4 intervening banks have no locus standi to oppose at this stage; rights to oppose arise only under s 301(2)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment