{"hits":[{"id":"159e14eb2eb94cf0011341deb71a7803761eaef90a1e20a4b3250c043b046fa8","sourceObjectId":"6a492e09bac7716852a21e8a","projectionFingerprint":"sha256:1f95db229df7bcdeb32c8c12df815ca4fdc1f04ffa52a1928fab9637d7d210f9","score":null,"slug":"ng-kwong-fai-v-ng-chee-yew-sdn-bhd-Statuteoflimitations-high-court-2026--6a492e09bac7716852a21e8a","caseId":"a0db11b0-be89-53bd-b9a9-e8fbded980a2","case_id":"a0db11b0-be89-53bd-b9a9-e8fbded980a2","href":"/case-law/malaysia/ng-kwong-fai-v-ng-chee-yew-sdn-bhd-Statuteoflimitations-high-court-2026--6a492e09bac7716852a21e8a","title":"NG KWONG FAI 1. ) NG CHEE YEW SDN. BHD. 2. ) NG KWONG WAH @ PAUL NG 3. ) TEH PO TAN","name":"NG KWONG FAI 1. ) NG CHEE YEW SDN. BHD. 2. ) NG KWONG WAH @ PAUL NG 3. ) TEH PO TAN","displayTitle":"NG KWONG FAI 1. ) NG CHEE YEW SDN. BHD. 2. ) NG KWONG WAH @ PAUL NG 3. ) TEH PO TAN","displayCitation":"NA-22NCvC-6-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)","displayCourt":"High Court","displayCaseNumber":"NA-22NCvC-6-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)","displayDate":"2026-08-13","citation":"NA-22NCvC-6-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)","court":"High Court","case_number":"NA-22NCvC-6-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)","judgment_date":"2026-08-13","judges":[],"country":"malaysia","jurisdiction":"malaysia","canonical":{"jurisdictionId":"malaysia","canonicalPath":"/case-law/malaysia/ng-kwong-fai-v-ng-chee-yew-sdn-bhd-Statuteoflimitations-high-court-2026--6a492e09bac7716852a21e8a","caseTitle":"NG KWONG FAI 1. ) NG CHEE YEW SDN. BHD. 2. ) NG KWONG WAH @ PAUL NG 3. ) TEH PO TAN","citation":"NA-22NCvC-6-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)","neutralCitation":""},"seo":{"jurisdictionSlug":"malaysia","canonicalUrl":"https://chat.esheria.ai/case-law/malaysia/ng-kwong-fai-v-ng-chee-yew-sdn-bhd-Statuteoflimitations-high-court-2026--6a492e09bac7716852a21e8a"},"classification":{"legalTopics":["Statute of limitations","Res judicata","Fraud","Shares/ownership","Abuse of process/strike out"],"legalAreas":["Civil procedure","Company law","Limitation law","Equity and trusts"]},"legal_topics":["Statute of limitations","Res judicata","Fraud","Shares/ownership","Abuse of process/strike out"],"preview":{"snippetText":"The court held the plaintiff's substantive claim was statute-barred because the cause of action accrued by 1999 or at latest 2012 and the plaintiff had sufficient knowledge earlier; section 29 did not save the claim because discovery with reasonable diligence occurred earlier; an earlier final decision had already found the claim time-barred, invoking res judicata; consequently the proceedings were an abuse of process and the writ and statement of claim were struck out with costs to Defendants 2 and 3."}},{"id":"06c276de33a123b0abc37aba93d7287668ce9890ee3d18feab23208d9ec925a4","sourceObjectId":"6a3ea5013b1caa9129800ded","projectionFingerprint":"sha256:c8b374a0b15f6d29031edd4bd7e77dd875809e89e3f74fa9244ed993a1ff18ab","score":null,"slug":"hp-v-fp-HabitualResidence-court-unknown--6a3ea5013b1caa9129800ded","caseId":"2f0fb046-097d-5c54-9283-c4caff7c0e59","case_id":"2f0fb046-097d-5c54-9283-c4caff7c0e59","href":"/case-law/england-and-wales/hp-v-fp-HabitualResidence-court-unknown--6a3ea5013b1caa9129800ded","title":"MP (A Child; Habitual Residence), Re","name":"MP (A Child; Habitual Residence), Re","displayTitle":"MP (A Child; Habitual Residence), Re","displayCitation":"This website uses cookies","displayCourt":"","displayCaseNumber":"","displayDate":"2026-08-01","citation":"This website uses cookies","court":"","case_number":"","judgment_date":"2026-08-01","judges":[],"country":"england-and-wales","jurisdiction":"england-and-wales","canonical":{"jurisdictionId":"england-and-wales","canonicalPath":"/case-law/england-and-wales/hp-v-fp-HabitualResidence-court-unknown--6a3ea5013b1caa9129800ded","caseTitle":"MP (A Child; Habitual Residence), Re","citation":"This website uses cookies","neutralCitation":""},"seo":{"jurisdictionSlug":"england-and-wales","canonicalUrl":"https://chat.esheria.ai/case-law/england-and-wales/hp-v-fp-HabitualResidence-court-unknown--6a3ea5013b1caa9129800ded"},"classification":{"legalTopics":["Habitual Residence","Jurisdiction","Parental Responsibility","Children Act 1989","Hague Convention 1996"],"legalAreas":["Family Law","Private International Law"]},"legal_topics":["Habitual Residence","Jurisdiction","Parental Responsibility","Children Act 1989","Hague Convention 1996"],"preview":{"snippetText":"As at the date of issue of the father's Children Act proceedings (29 July 2025), MP was habitually resident in Country B. The court found that MP's presence in England was always contingent on not exceeding 120 days per year due to tax residency, that his integration and lived experience in Country B (especially with his mother) outweighed the factors supporting habitual residence in England, and that recent experiences and connections in Country B were more immediate and substantial. Accordingly, the courts of Country B have primary jurisdiction over matters of parental responsibility for MP…"}},{"id":"101d4cca6b10adf19f820f902321ccfb39bc369d8ab67e12c0f7526c2f22e38b","sourceObjectId":"6a3ea4f03b1caa91297f8dfb","projectionFingerprint":"sha256:594d4f2ade8b6fc89c8f09e85d88cc5a9a0fdc7493216f40841a5eb801eacf62","score":null,"slug":"m1-v-rf-ParentalResponsibility-court-unknown--6a3ea4f03b1caa91297f8dfb","caseId":"e4ad7215-a2c2-5633-adc4-553e200cc815","case_id":"e4ad7215-a2c2-5633-adc4-553e200cc815","href":"/case-law/england-and-wales/m1-v-rf-ParentalResponsibility-court-unknown--6a3ea4f03b1caa91297f8dfb","title":"Children: Parental Responsibility, Re","name":"Children: Parental Responsibility, Re","displayTitle":"Children: Parental Responsibility, Re","displayCitation":"This website uses cookies","displayCourt":"","displayCaseNumber":"","displayDate":"2026-08-01","citation":"This website uses cookies","court":"","case_number":"","judgment_date":"2026-08-01","judges":[],"country":"england-and-wales","jurisdiction":"england-and-wales","canonical":{"jurisdictionId":"england-and-wales","canonicalPath":"/case-law/england-and-wales/m1-v-rf-ParentalResponsibility-court-unknown--6a3ea4f03b1caa91297f8dfb","caseTitle":"Children: Parental Responsibility, Re","citation":"This website uses cookies","neutralCitation":""},"seo":{"jurisdictionSlug":"england-and-wales","canonicalUrl":"https://chat.esheria.ai/case-law/england-and-wales/m1-v-rf-ParentalResponsibility-court-unknown--6a3ea4f03b1caa91297f8dfb"},"classification":{"legalTopics":["Parental Responsibility","Child Arrangements","Declarations of Parentage","Prohibited Steps Orders","Special Guardianship","Adoption","Disclosure","Social Media Restrictions","Section 91(14) Orders"],"legalAreas":["Family Law","Child Law"]},"legal_topics":["Parental Responsibility","Child Arrangements","Declarations of Parentage","Prohibited Steps Orders","Special Guardianship","Adoption","Disclosure","Social Media Restrictions","Section 91(14) Orders"],"preview":{"snippetText":"M2 never had parental responsibility for RF and AF as the statutory criteria under section 42 HFEA were not met due to natural insemination; granting PR to M2 would not be in the children's best interests given her inability to accept court findings and risk of emotional harm. F is granted PR for RF and AF based on commitment and relationship. M2's contact with RF and AF must be supervised due to risk of emotional harm. FA lives with M1 and has no contact with M2. Section 91(14) order is made to restrict further applications for two years. Applications for baptism, travel, passports, and adop…"}},{"id":"2fc879e733ad18f500602d5aa8a8926948a9a6f5a4382f8c17994e090db0ec0f","sourceObjectId":"6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b2","projectionFingerprint":"sha256:73182ccc717597b2f2fe6c5407a6366024980c0822fdce3cef0b71e5c1981c8a","score":null,"slug":"lees-cleaning-contractors-llp-ta-lees-premier-cleaning-v-environment-agency-EnergySavingsOpportunityScheme-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b2","caseId":"9f62069b-0505-5daa-903c-2375abf6b8e7","case_id":"9f62069b-0505-5daa-903c-2375abf6b8e7","href":"/case-law/england-and-wales/lees-cleaning-contractors-llp-ta-lees-premier-cleaning-v-environment-agency-EnergySavingsOpportunityScheme-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b2","title":"Lees Cleaning Contractors LLP v Environment Agency","name":"Lees Cleaning Contractors LLP v Environment Agency","displayTitle":"Lees Cleaning Contractors LLP v Environment Agency","displayCitation":"This website uses cookies","displayCourt":"","displayCaseNumber":"","displayDate":"2026-08-01","citation":"This website uses cookies","court":"","case_number":"","judgment_date":"2026-08-01","judges":[],"country":"england-and-wales","jurisdiction":"england-and-wales","canonical":{"jurisdictionId":"england-and-wales","canonicalPath":"/case-law/england-and-wales/lees-cleaning-contractors-llp-ta-lees-premier-cleaning-v-environment-agency-EnergySavingsOpportunityScheme-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b2","caseTitle":"Lees Cleaning Contractors LLP v Environment Agency","citation":"This website uses cookies","neutralCitation":""},"seo":{"jurisdictionSlug":"england-and-wales","canonicalUrl":"https://chat.esheria.ai/case-law/england-and-wales/lees-cleaning-contractors-llp-ta-lees-premier-cleaning-v-environment-agency-EnergySavingsOpportunityScheme-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b2"},"classification":{"legalTopics":["Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme","enforcement notice","definition of relevant undertaking","employee status for compliance"],"legalAreas":["environmental law","regulatory compliance"]},"legal_topics":["Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme","enforcement notice","definition of relevant undertaking","employee status for compliance"],"preview":{"snippetText":"The tribunal found that the appellant met the definition of a relevant undertaking based on employee numbers at the relevant time, that the Environment Agency followed proper procedures and issued the enforcement notice reasonably and lawfully, and that the notice was not based on an error of fact or law."}},{"id":"4f8fc2788024babf8ba70bf7ecd74f6495583f67a9158da9f21421b2e3a9f046","sourceObjectId":"6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b1","projectionFingerprint":"sha256:767108f5fce1d0ae872c36fc5215f5522d83376adf575c070cc38cb1af3d315b","score":null,"slug":"kim-resch-v-the-registrar-of-approved-driving-instructors-appealprocedure-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b1","caseId":"fa4489a8-41a4-52b6-ba11-171ca2bddd00","case_id":"fa4489a8-41a4-52b6-ba11-171ca2bddd00","href":"/case-law/england-and-wales/kim-resch-v-the-registrar-of-approved-driving-instructors-appealprocedure-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b1","title":"Kim Resch v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors","name":"Kim Resch v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors","displayTitle":"Kim Resch v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors","displayCitation":"This website uses cookies","displayCourt":"","displayCaseNumber":"","displayDate":"2026-08-01","citation":"This website uses cookies","court":"","case_number":"","judgment_date":"2026-08-01","judges":[],"country":"england-and-wales","jurisdiction":"england-and-wales","canonical":{"jurisdictionId":"england-and-wales","canonicalPath":"/case-law/england-and-wales/kim-resch-v-the-registrar-of-approved-driving-instructors-appealprocedure-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b1","caseTitle":"Kim Resch v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors","citation":"This website uses cookies","neutralCitation":""},"seo":{"jurisdictionSlug":"england-and-wales","canonicalUrl":"https://chat.esheria.ai/case-law/england-and-wales/kim-resch-v-the-registrar-of-approved-driving-instructors-appealprocedure-court-unknown--6a3ea5083b1caa91298046b1"},"classification":{"legalTopics":["appeal procedure","non-compliance with tribunal directions","strike out"],"legalAreas":["administrative law","regulatory law"]},"legal_topics":["appeal procedure","non-compliance with tribunal directions","strike out"],"preview":{"snippetText":"The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions requiring confirmation of whether to continue or withdraw the appeal."}}],"total":5028459,"totalRelation":"eq","queryMode":"v4","facets":{},"pageInfo":{"page":1,"size":10,"hasNext":true,"hasPrevious":false,"nextCursor":"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.TjR9uANJYIR3FG2V5NHP2SAlXlEWM_jbvuomgwVeqbA","previousCursor":null,"cursorPagination":true}}