Constitution (Eighth) (Amendment) Act No. 21 of 2023
3
- Jurisdiction
- Vanuatu
- Provision
- 3
- Source language
- root
- Recorded status
- in force
More details
- Recorded status
- in force
Provision text
Official sourcee appellants did not face a claim if no appeal had been filed
that now that the constitutional amendments had been approved by national referendum, they had
not challenged the dismissal of their constitutional application by the Chief Justice.
After hearing from counsel for the Republic, the Court was able to reassure the appellants that the
Chief Justice’s dismissal of the challenge to the Constitution (Eighth) (Amendment) Act as
premature, was a decision only at a point of time prior to the referendum. As the Chief Justice made
it clear in paragraph 50 (above), his conclusion that it was premature was because the referendum
had not been held and therefore at that time, the proposed constitutional amendments in Article 17A
and 17B had not come into force. And so at that time of the Chief Justice’s decision, there was no
effect on the rights of any persons and no breach of any rights under the Constitution, because the
constitutional amendments had not become law. Before they could become the law of Vanuatu,
approval by national referendum was required. If the national referendum did not approve Articles
17A and 17B, then they would not become law and no rights would be infringed. If the proposed
Articles became law as a result of the vote in the national referendum, then at that point in time a
challenge to the constitutionality of the Constitution (Eighth) (Amendment) Act could be made.
Given the constitutional amendments in Articles 17A and 17B have been approved in a national
referendum and are part of the Constitution of Vanuatu, it is now open to the appellants, should they
wish to do so, to challenge the constitutionality of those provisions. Having understood that was the
position, confirmed by counsel for the Republic, counsel for the appellants accepted that on the basis
of that assurance, this appeal could be dismissed.
Given the assurance given by counsel for the Republic of Vanuatu and given the view this Court
expressed in this decision the appeal is dismissed.
No costs were sought by the Republic and accordingly we order no costs.
DATED at Port Vila, this 16 day of August, 2024
BY THE COURT
Source record
Source and verification
Constitution (Eighth) (Amendment) Act No. 21 of 2023 · courts.gov.vu · Retrieved 19 August 2026.
Check the upstream source for currency, amendments, and official formatting. The recorded status describes this source version.
Open upstream source