NOTARIAL DOCUMENTS Copies of notarial acts in Quebec admissible 40 A copy of a notarial act or instrument in writing made, filed, enrolled, or enregistered, in Quebec, certified by a notary or prothonotary to be a true copy of the original in their possession as such notary or prothonotary, is receivable in evidence in the place and stead of the original, and has the same force and effect as the original would have if produced and proved. How impeached 41 The proof by such a certified copy may be rebutted or set aside by proof that there is no such original, or that the copy is not a true copy of the original in some material particular, or that the original is not an instrument of such nature as may, by the law of Quebec, be taken before a notary, or be filed, enrolled, or enregistered, by a notary. Effect of protest as evidence 42 A protest of a bill of exchange or promissory note purporting to be under the hand of a notary public, wherever made, shall be received as evidence of the allegations and facts therein stated. Effect of certain certificates of notaries 43 A note, memorandum, or certificate, purporting to be made by a notary public in any part of the Commonwealth or the United States, in their own handwriting, or to be signed by them at the foot of, or embodied in, any protest or in a regular register of official acts purporting to be kept by them, is evidence of the fact of notice of non-acceptance or non-payment of a bill of exchange or promissory note having been sent or delivered, at the time and in the manner stated in the note, certificate, or memorandum. CERTIFICATES UNDER THE CANADA GRAIN ACT Certificate of inspecting officer under The Canada Grain Act 44 A document purporting to be a certificate or duplicate certificate, issued and signed by an inspecting officer under the authority of The Canada Grain Act , specifying the grade of any grain that has been inspected by that officer, is evidence of the grade of that grain. Extract from inspector's record 45 A document purporting to be an extract from the record kept by the chief grain inspector or by any inspector of grain in pursuance of The Canada Grain Act , and to be certified by the chief inspector, inspector, or any person in the office of either of them, is evidence of the facts set forth in the extract. Certificate by weighmaster 46 A document purporting to be a certificate or duplicate certificate issued and signed by a weighmaster or their assistant, under the authority of The Canada Grain Act , showing the amount of each weighing, the number of each car or cargo weighed, the initial of the car, the place where weighed, the date of weighing, and the contents of the car or cargo, shall be evidence of the facts therein stated. Extract from weighmaster's record 47 A certificate or extract from a record used by a weighmaster or grain inspecting officer under The Canada Grain Act , signed as provided by that Act, shall be evidence of the facts stated therein. BANK BOOKS Copy of bank books, etc., as evidence 48(1) Subject to this section, a copy of any entry in a book or record kept in a financial institution shall, in all legal proceedings, be received in evidence as prima facie proof of the entry and of the matters, transactions, and accounts, therein recorded. Proof 48(2) A copy of an entry in a book or record kept in a financial institution shall not be received in evidence under this section unless it is first proved that (a) the book or record was, at the time of the making of the entry, one of the ordinary books or records of the financial institution; (b) the entry was made in the usual and ordinary course of business; (c) the book or record is in the custody or control of the financial institution; and (d) the copy is a true copy of the entry. Method of proof 48(3) The proof required under subsection (2) may be given by the manager or accountant of the financial institution and may be given orally or by affidavit. Bank and officers when bank not party 48(4) A financial institution or officer of a financial institution is not, in any legal proceeding to which the financial institution is not a party, compellable to produce any book or record, the contents of which can be proved under this section, or to appear as a witness to prove the matters, transactions, and accounts, therein recorded unless by order of the court made for special cause. Order for inspection 48(5) Upon the application of any party to a legal proceeding, the court may order that the party be at liberty to inspect and take copies of any entries in the books or records of a financial institution for the purposes of the proceeding. Notice of inspection 48(6) The person whose account is to be inspected shall be notified of the application at least two clear days before the hearing thereof; and, if it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that the person cannot be notified personally, the notice may be given by addressing it to the financial institution. Costs 48(7) The costs of an application to a court under, or for the purposes of, this section, and the costs of anything done or to be done under an order of a court made under, or for the purposes of, this section, are in the discretion of the court, which may order them, or any part thereof, to be paid to any party by the financial institution, where they have been occasioned by any default or delay on the part of the financial institution. Enforcement of order 48(8) An order against a financial institution made under subsection (7) may be enforced as if the financial institution were a party to the proceeding. Holidays 48(9) Holidays shall be excluded from the computation of time under this section. Definition of "financial institution" 48(10) In this section "financial institution" means the Bank of Canada, the Federal Business Development Bank and any other institution incorporated in Canada that accepts deposits of money from its members or from the public, and includes a branch, agency or office of such Banks or institutions. Definitions 49(1) In this section "business" includes every kind of business, profession, occupation, calling, operation, or activity, whether carried on for profit or otherwise, and whether carried on by or as part of the operation of government; (« affaire ») "record" includes any information that is recorded or stored by means of any device. (« document ») Where business records admissible 49(2) Any writing or record made of an act, transaction, occurrence or event is admissible as evidence of the act, transaction, occurrence or event if (a) it is made in the usual and ordinary course of any business; and (b) it was in the usual and ordinary course of business to make the writing or record at the time of the act, transaction, occurrence or event, or within a reasonable time thereafter. Notice of intention to produce 49(3) Unless the court orders otherwise, no writing or record shall be received in evidence under this section unless the party producing the writing or record has, at least seven days before its production, given notice of the party's intention to produce it to each other party to the action and has, within five days after receiving any notice in that behalf given by any other party, produced it for inspection by that other party. Surrounding circumstances 49(4) The circumstances of the making of any writing or record to which reference is made in subsection (2), including lack of personal knowledge by the maker, may be shown to affect its weight, but the circumstances do not affect its admissibility. Previous rules as to admissibility, etc. 49(5) Nothing in this section affects the admissibility of any evidence that would be admissible apart from this section or makes admissible any writing or record that is privileged. Medical reports 50(1) Any medical report obtained by or prepared for a party to an action and signed by a duly qualified medical practitioner licensed or certified to practise in any part of Canada is admissible in evidence in any action if a copy of the report is furnished to each of the other parties to the action at least fourteen days before the trial. Report required 50(2) Except by leave of the judge presiding at the trial, a duly qualified medical practitioner who has medically examined any party to the action shall not give evidence at the trial touching upon that examination unless a copy of the report thereof has been given to each of the other parties in accordance with subsection (1). Right to cross-examine 50(3) Where a party to an action submits a medical report in evidence in the action, any other party to the action may require the duly qualified medical practitioner who signed the report to be called as a witness and may cross-examine them on the report. Where a doctor called unnecessarily 50(4) Where a duly qualified medical practitioner has been required to give evidence viva voce in an action on examination in chief or on cross-examination and, the court is of opinion that the evidence so obtained does not materially add to the information in a report required under subsection (2), it may order the party that required the attendance of the medical practitioner to pay, as costs therefor, such sum as it deems appropriate. S.M. 2009, c. 15, s. 233 . Definitions 51(1) In this section, "person" includes, (a) the Government of Canada and the government of any province of Canada and any department, commission, board, or branch, of any such government; (b) the heirs, executors, administrators, or other legal representatives of a person; and (c) a person in charge of, or having custody of, the records of any court; (« personne ») and "photographic film" includes any photographic plate, microphotographic film, and photostatic negative, and "photograph" has a corresponding meaning. (« pellicule photographique ») Admissibility in evidence of photographic print 51(2) Where a bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque, receipt, instrument, agreement, document, plan, or record or book or entry therein, kept or held by any person, (a) is photographed in the course of an established practice of that person of photographing objects of the same or a similar class in order to keep a permanent record thereof; and (b) is destroyed by, or in the presence of, the person or of one or more of the person's employees, or delivered to another person in the ordinary course of business, or lost; a print from the photographic film is admissible in evidence in all cases and for all purposes for which the object photographed would have been admissible. Refusal to admit by court 51(3) Where a bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque, receipt, instrument, agreement, or other executed or signed document, was so destroyed before the expiration of six years from, (a) the date when in the ordinary course of business either the object or the matter to which it related ceased to be treated as current by the person having custody or control of the object; or (b) the date of receipt by the person having custody or control of the object of notice in writing of any claim in respect of the object or matter prior to the destruction of the object; whichever is the later date, the court may refuse to admit in evidence under this section a print from a photographic film of the object. Where subsec. (3) not applicable 51(4) Where the photographic print is tendered by a government or the Bank of Canada, or a person in charge of, or having custody of, the records of any court, subsection (3) does not apply. Manner of proof 51(5) Proof of compliance with the conditions prescribed by this section may be given by any person having knowledge of the facts, either orally or by affidavit sworn before a notary public; and, unless the court otherwise orders, a notarial copy of any such affidavit is admissible in evidence in lieu of the original affidavit. Definitions 51.1 In this section and sections 51.2 to 51.7, "computer system" means a device that, or a group of interconnected or related devices one or more of which, (a) contains computer programs or other data, and (b) pursuant to computer programs, performs logic and control, and may perform any other function; (« système informatique ») "data" means representations of information or of concepts, in any form; (« données ») "electronic document" means data that (a) is recorded or stored on any medium in or by a computer system or other similar device, and (b) can be read or perceived by a person or by a computer system or other similar device, and includes a display, printout or other output of that data; (« document électronique ») "electronic documents system" includes a computer system or other similar device by or in which data is recorded or stored, and any procedures related to the recording or storage of electronic documents; (« système de documents électroniques ») "electronic signature" means an electronic signature as defined in section 1 of The Electronic Commerce and Information Act . (« signature électronique ») S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Authentication of electronic documents 51.2 Any person seeking to admit an electronic document as evidence has the burden of proving its authenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic document is that which it is purported to be. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Application of best evidence rule to electronic documents 51.3(1) The best evidence rule in respect of an electronic document is satisfied (a) on proof of the integrity of the electronic documents system by or in which the electronic document was recorded or stored; or (b) if an evidentiary presumption established under section 51.5 applies. Printouts 51.3(2) Despite subsection (1), in the absence of evidence to the contrary, an electronic document in the form of a printout satisfies the best evidence rule if the printout has been manifestly or consistently acted on, relied on or used as a record of the information recorded or stored in the printout. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Presumption of integrity 51.4 For the purposes of subsection 51.3(1), in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the integrity of an electronic documents system by or in which an electronic document is recorded or stored is proven (a) by evidence capable of supporting a finding that at all material times the computer system or other similar device used by the electronic documents system was operating properly or, if it was not, the fact of its not operating properly did not affect the integrity of the electronic document and there are no other reasonable grounds to doubt the integrity of the electronic documents system; (b) if it is established that the electronic document was recorded or stored by a party who is adverse in interest to the party seeking to introduce it; or (c) if it is established that the electronic document was recorded or stored in the usual and ordinary course of business by a person who is not a party and who did not record or store it under the control of the party seeking to introduce it. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Presumptions regarding electronic signatures 51.5 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations establishing evidentiary presumptions in relation to electronic documents signed with electronic signatures, including regulations respecting (a) the association of electronic signatures with persons; and (b) the integrity of information contained in electronic documents signed with electronic signatures. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Standards may be considered 51.6 For the purpose of determining under any rule of law whether an electronic document is admissible, evidence may be presented in respect of any standard, procedure, usage or practice concerning the manner in which electronic documents are to be recorded or stored, having regard to the type of business, enterprise or endeavour that used, recorded or stored the electronic document and the nature and purpose of the electronic document. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Proof by affidavit 51.7(1) The matters referred to in subsection 51.3(2) and sections 51.4 and 51.6 and in regulations made under section 51.5 may be established by an affidavit given to the best of the deponent's knowledge and belief. Cross examination 51.7(2) A party may cross-examine a deponent of an affidavit referred to in subsection (1) that has been introduced in evidence (a) as of right, if the deponent is an adverse party or is under the control of an adverse party; and (b) with leave of the court, in the case of any other deponent. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . Application 51.8 Sections 51.2 to 51.5 do not affect any rule of law relating to the admissibility of evidence, except the rules relating to authentication and best evidence. S.M. 2000, c. 32, s. 38 . WILLS Method of proving wills 52(1) The probate of a will or a copy thereof, certified under the hand of the clerk of the court in which probate was granted, or proved to be a true copy of the original will shall, when the will has been entered in the records of the court, be received as evidence of the original will; but the court may, upon due cause shown upon affidavit, order the original will to be produced in evidence, or may direct such other proof of the original will as, under the circumstances, appears necessary or reasonable for testing the authenticity of the alleged original will and its unaltered condition and the correctness of the prepared copy. Saving 52(2) This section applies to wills and the probate and copies of wills proved elsewhere than in the province, provided that the original wills have been deposited, and the probate and copies granted, in courts having jurisdiction over the proof of wills and administration of the estates of intestates or the custody of wills. Proof of death of members of Canadian Forces 53(1) The production of a certificate purporting to be signed by an authority authorized in that behalf under the National Defence Act (Canada) or under regulations made thereunder, stating that the person named in the certificate died, or was deemed to have died, on a date set forth therein, is admissible in evidence as prima facie proof for any purpose to which the authority of the Legislature extends, that the person so named died on that date, and also of the office, authority and signature of the person signing the certificate, without any proof of the person's appointment, authority or signature. Proof of service of members of Canadian Forces 53(2) The production of a certificate purporting to be signed by the officer in charge of records of the naval, military or air forces of His Majesty raised by Canada, stating that the person named in the certificate was a member of any of those forces and was serving on active service during the period between the dates set forth therein, is admissible in evidence as prima facie proof, for any purpose to which the authority of the Legislature extends, that the person so named was on active service during that period, and also of the office, authority and signature of the person signing the certificate, without any proof of the person's appointment, authority or signature. MERCANTILE DOCUMENTS Proof of certain documents 54(1) A party intending to prove the original of a telegram, letter, shipping bill, bill of lading, delivery order, receipt, account, or other written instrument used in business or other transactions, may give notice to the opposite party, ten days at least before the trial or other proceeding in which the proof is intended to be adduced, that the party intends to give in evidence, as proof of the contents thereof, a writing purporting to be a copy of such an instrument, and in the notice shall name some convenient time and place for the inspection thereof. Inspection 54(2) The copy may then be inspected by the opposite party, and, without further proof, is sufficient evidence of the contents of the original document, and shall be accepted and taken in lieu of the original, unless the party receiving the notice, within four days after the time mentioned for the inspection, gives notice that the party intends to dispute the correctness or genuineness of the copy at the trial or proceeding, and to require proof of the original; and the costs attending any production or proof of the original instrument are in the discretion of the court. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS RESPECTING DOCUMENTS Where no attestation required 55(1) It is not necessary to prove, by the attesting witness, an instrument to the validity of which attestation is not requisite. How proved 55(2) The instrument may be proved by admission or otherwise as if there had been no attesting witness thereto. Comparison of disputed writing with genuine 56 Comparison of a disputed writing with any writing proved to the satisfaction of the court to be genuine shall be permitted to be made by a witness; and the writings and the evidence of witnesses respecting them may be submitted to the court or jury as evidence of the genuineness or otherwise of the writing in dispute. Where instruments offered in evidence may be impounded 57 Where a document is received in evidence, the court admitting it may direct that it be impounded and kept in such custody for such period, and subject to such conditions, as seem proper, or until the further order of the court. ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Admissibility of documentary evidence as to facts in issue 58(1) In any legal proceedings where direct oral evidence as to a fact would be admissible, any statement made by a person in a document and tending to establish that fact is, on production of the original document, admissible as evidence of that fact, (a) if the maker of the statement either (i) had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with by the statement; or (ii) where the document in question is, or forms part of, a record purporting to be a continuous record, made the statement (in so far as the matters dealt with thereby are not within the maker's personal knowledge) in the performance of a duty to record information supplied to the maker by a person who had, or might reasonably be supposed to have, personal knowledge of those matters; and (b) subject to subsection (2), if the maker of the statement is called as a witness in the proceedings. Exception 58(2) The condition set out in clause (1)⁠(b) that the maker of the statement shall be called as a witness need not be satisfied if the maker is dead or unfit by reason of a bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness, or if the maker is without the province and it is not reasonably practicable to secure the maker's attendance, or if all reasonable efforts to find the maker have been made without success. Where full compliance with subsection (1) not required 58(3) In any legal proceedings the court may, at any stage of the proceedings, if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it is satisfied that undue delay or expense would otherwise be caused, order that such a statement as is mentioned in subsection (1) shall be admissible as evidence, or may, without any such order having been made, admit such a statement in evidence, (a) notwithstanding that the maker of the statement is available but is not called as a witness; and (b) notwithstanding that the original document is not produced if, in lieu thereof, there is produced a copy of the original document or of the material part thereof, certified to be a true copy in such manner as may be specified in the order or as the court may approve, as the case may be. Statement must be prior to proceedings 58(4) Nothing in this section renders admissible as evidence any statement made by a person interested at a time when proceedings were pending or anticipated involving a dispute as to any fact that the statement might tend to establish. Statement must be authenticated by maker 58(5) For the purposes of this section a statement in a document shall not be deemed to have been made by a person unless the document or the material part thereof was written, made, or produced, by them with their own hand, or was signed or initialled by them, or otherwise recognized by them in writing as one for the accuracy of which the person is responsible. Discretion of court respecting admissibility of statement 58(6) For the purpose of deciding whether or not a statement is admissible as evidence by virtue of this section, the court may draw any reasonable inference from the form or contents of the document in which the statement is contained, or from any other circumstances, and it may, in deciding whether or not a person is fit to attend as a witness, act on a certificate purporting to be the certificate of a duly qualified medical practitioner; and where the legal proceedings are with a jury, the court may, in its discretion, reject the statement notwithstanding that the requirements of this section are satisfied with respect thereto, if for any reason it appears to it to be inexpedient in the interests of justice that the statement should be admitted. Weight to be attached to evidence 59(1) In estimating the weight, if any, to be attached to a statement rendered admissible as evidence by section 58, regard shall be had to all the circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the accuracy or otherwise of the statement, and in particular to the question whether or not the statement was made contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts stated, and to the question of whether or not the maker of the statement had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent facts. Document not to corroborate evidence of maker 59(2) For the purpose of any rule of law or practice requiring evidence to be corroborated or regulating the manner in which uncorroborated evidence is to be treated, a statement rendered admissible as evidence by section 58 shall not be treated as corroboration of evidence given by the maker of the statement. Interpretation 60(1) In sections 58 and 59, "document" includes books, maps, plans, drawings, and photographs; (« document ») "statement" includes any representation of fact whether made in words or otherwise. (« déclaration ») Saving 60(2) Nothing in section 58 or 59 (a) prejudices the admissibility of any evidence that would, apart from those sections, be admissible; or (b) enables documentary evidence to be given as to any declaration relating to a matter of pedigree, if that declaration would not have been admissible as evidence if those sections had not been enacted. DIVISION V EVIDENCE BY AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION STATUTORY DECLARATIONS Statutory declarations 61 Any person authorized to take affidavits may receive the solemn declaration of any person voluntarily making it before the person, in attestation of the execution of any writing, deed, or instrument, or of the truth of any fact, or of any account rendered in writing, in the following form: I, A.B., do solemnly declare that (state the fact or facts declared to), and make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true, and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath. Declared before me at ______, this ____ day of ______, 20__. AFFIDAVITS, AFFIRMATIONS AND DECLARATIONS Affidavit, etc., to be taken within province 62(1) Any oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration, for use in the province may be administered, sworn, affirmed, made, or declared, within the province before any of the following persons: (a) A commissioner for oaths. (b) The Lieutenant Governor. (c) The Clerk of the Executive Council of the province. (d) A justice of the peace in the province. (e) The judge of any court in the province. (f) An associate judge or the Registrar or a deputy registrar of the Court of King's Bench. (g) A district registrar, deputy district registrar, or a deputy of a district registrar, of any land titles office in the province, or the Registrar-General under The Real Property Act . (h) A barrister-at-law or attorney-at-law duly admitted and entitled to practise as such in the province. (i) A notary public appointed for the province. (j) The mayor, reeve, or clerk of any municipality, the resident administrator of any local government district, or the secretary-treasurer of any school district or school division, established under The Public Schools Act . (k) The postmaster of any post office in the province who is appointed under the Canada Post Corporation Act (Canada). (l) The chief sheriff or any sheriff in the province or the deputy of any of them. (m) A member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force. (n) A surveyor authorized to practise under The Land Surveyors Act . Designation of office 62(2) Every such officer shall designate their office below their signature to the jurat on any affidavit or statutory declaration sworn, affirmed, or declared, before them. Oaths, etc., administered by commissioned officers 62(3) An oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration administered, sworn, affirmed, made, or declared within or outside Manitoba before a person who holds a commission as an officer in the Canadian Forces and is on full-time service is as valid and effectual to all intents and purposes as if it had been duly administered, sworn, affirmed, or made within Manitoba before a commissioner for oaths appointed under Part II. Admissibility 62(4) A document that purports to be signed by a person mentioned in subsection (3) in testimony of an oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration having been administered, sworn, affirmed, or made before the person and on which their rank and unit are shown below their signature, is admissible in evidence without proof of their signature or of their rank or unit or that the person is on full-time service. S.M. 2005, c. 8, s. 11 ; S.M. 2023, c. 34, s. 55 ; S.M. 2024, c. 9, s. 16 . Oaths, etc., administered outside province 63(1) An oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration administered, sworn, affirmed, or made outside Manitoba before, (a) a judge; (b) a justice of the peace; (c) an officer of a court of justice; (d) a commissioner for taking affidavits, or other competent authority of a similar nature; (e) a notary public; (f) the head of a city, town, village, township, or other municipality; (g) an officer of any of His Majesty's diplomatic or consular services, including an ambassador, envoy, minister, charge d'affaires, counsellor, secretary, attache, consul-general, consul, vice-consul, pro-consul, consular agent, acting consul-general, acting consul, acting vice-consul and acting consular agent; (h) an officer of the Canadian diplomatic, consular, or representative services, including, in addition to the diplomatic and consular officers mentioned in clause (g), a high commissioner, permanent delegate, acting high commissioner, acting permanent delegate, counsellor, and secretary; (i) a Canadian Government Trade Commissioner or an Assistant Canadian Government Trade Commissioner; or (j) a commissioner authorized by the laws of Manitoba to take affidavits outside Manitoba; exercising their functions or having jurisdiction or authority as such in the place in which it is administered, sworn, affirmed, or made, is as valid and effectual to all intents and purposes as if it had been duly administered, sworn, affirmed, or made within Manitoba before a commissioner for oaths appointed under Part II. Oaths, etc., administered outside Manitoba by Manitoba officers 63(2) An oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration administered, sworn, affirmed, or made outside Manitoba before any person before whom an oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration may be administered, sworn, affirmed, or made within the province is as valid and effectual to all intents and purposes as if it had been duly administered, sworn, affirmed, or made within Manitoba before a commissioner for oaths appointed under Part II. Admissibility 63(3) A document that purports to be signed by a person mentioned in subsection (1) or (2) in testimony of an oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration having been administered, sworn, affirmed, or made before the person outside Manitoba and on which their office is shown below their signature, and (a) in the case of a notary public, that purports to have impressed thereon or attached thereto their official seal; (b) in the case of a person mentioned in clause (1)⁠(f), that purports to have impressed thereon or attached thereto the seal of the municipality; and (c) in the case of a person mentioned in clause (1)⁠(g), (h) or (i), that purports to have impressed thereon or attached thereto their seal or the seal or stamp of their office or of the office to which the person is attached is admissible in evidence without proof of their signature or of their office or official character or of the seal or stamp, and without proof that the person was exercising their functions or had jurisdiction or authority in the place in which the oath, affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration was administered, sworn, affirmed, or made. S.M. 2004, c. 42, s. 28 ; S.M. 2005, c. 8, s. 11 . ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS Mode of taking affidavits, affirmations, and declarations 64(1) Every oath, affirmation, and statutory declaration, shall be taken by the deponent or declarant in the presence of the commissioner or other officer or person administering it, who shall satisfy themselves of the genuineness of the signature of the deponent or declarant, and shall administer the oath, affirmation, or declaration, in the manner required by law before the commissioner or other officer or person signs the jurat or attestation. Form of oath, etc. 64(2) Where a person is about to swear or affirm an affidavit they may do so in the following form or to the same effect: In the case of an affidavit sworn, I/you, A.B., swear that the contents of this affidavit made and subscribed by me/you are true. So help me/you God. and in the case of an affidavit affirmed, I/you, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm that the contents of this affidavit made and subscribed by me/you are true. Jurat to state time and place 64(3) Every commissioner or other person before whom any affidavit or declaration is taken or made under this Act shall state truly in the jurat or attestation at what place and on what date the affidavit or declaration is taken or made. Special forms of jurat 64(4) Where a person who has sworn or affirmed an affidavit or made a statutory declaration is incapable of reading the affidavit or declaration or is incapable of writing their name, or swore or affirmed the affidavit or made the declaration through an interpreter, or where an affidavit or declaration is severally sworn, affirmed, or made, by two or more deponents or declarants, the person before whom the affidavit or declaration was sworn, affirmed, or made, may make use of that one of the forms of jurat hereinafter set out that is relevant to the case: FORM OF JURAT — INCAPABLE OF READING AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION Sworn (affirmed or declared) before me at the _______ of ______, in the _______ of _______, this __ ___ day of _______, 20__, having first been read over and explained by me to the deponent (or declarant) who, being incapable of reading the contents of the affidavit or declaration, appeared to understand the same and (choose one) (a) signed their signature in my presence; or (b) made their mark in my presence; or (c) verbally indicated their understanding of same. A Commissioner for Oaths, Notary Public, etc. FORM OF JURAT — TWO OR MORE DEPONENTS OR DECLARANTS Severally sworn (affirmed or declared) before me at the _______ of ______, in the _______ of ______, this ____ day of ______, 20__. A Commissioner for Oaths, Notary Public, etc. FORM OF JURAT — PERSON INCAPABLE OF WRITING NAME Severally sworn (affirmed or declared) before me at the _______ of ______, in the _______ of ______, this ____ day of ______, 20__ by the deponent (or declarant) who, being incapable of writing their name (choose one) (a) made their mark in my presence; or (b) verbally indicated their understanding of the affidavit or declaration. A Commissioner for Oaths, Notary Public, etc. FORM OF JURAT — INTERPRETER USED Sworn (affirmed or declared) before me at the ____ of ______, in the _______ of ______, this _____ day of ______, 20__, through the interpretation of _______, of the _______ of ______, in the _______ of ______, the said _______ having been first sworn truly and faithfully to interpret the contents of this affidavit (affirmation or declaration) to the deponent (or declarant), and truly and faithfully to interpret the oath about to be administered to them (or declaration about to be taken by them). A Commissioner for Oaths, Notary Public, etc. S.M. 2000, c. 35, s. 7 ; S.M. 2011, c. 35, s. 14 . Remote commissioning 64.1 Despite section 64, a person authorized under the regulations may administer an oath, affirmation or statutory declaration without being in the presence of the deponent or declarant if (a) the oath, affirmation or statutory declaration is administered in the manner specified in the regulations; and (b) in the case of an affidavit or statutory declaration, it contains or appends any wording required under the regulations, including any prescribed form of jurat. S.M. 2020, c. 25, s. 1 . Penalty for improper use of affidavits, etc. 65 Every person administering an oath, affirmation, or statutory declaration, who signs a jurat or attestation without the due administration of the oath, affirmation, or declaration, or who, in a proceeding in or out of court or for the purpose of making or maintaining any claim, makes, files, or uses, any affidavit or statutory declaration, knowing it has not been taken or made in conformity with this Act, is guilty of an offence and is liable, on summary conviction, to a fine of not less than $25. but not more than $500. for each offence. S.M. 2011, c. 35, s. 14 Formal defects, when not to vitiate 66 No informality in the heading or other formal requisites to any affidavit or declaration, made or taken before a commissioner or other person authorized to take affidavits under this or any Act, is an objection to its reception in evidence, if the court or officer before whom it is tendered thinks proper to receive it. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EVIDENCE Affidavits of service to be prima facie evidence 67 In any action or proceeding in any court in the province, every affidavit of service of a notice or document, which affidavit has been registered, filed, or deposited, in any land titles office or registry office in the province, is evidence of the service of the notice or document and of the truth of any other statement relating to the service set forth in the affidavit. Where acknowledgment before notary sufficient 68(1) Where, under any Act of the Legislature, the execution at a place outside Canada of any instrument or document including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any of the following instruments, that is to say, (a) a transfer, grant, deed, lease, or other conveyance of land or of any interest therein; or (b) any agreement to sell land or any mortgage of land or discharge of such a mortgage; by any party thereto is required to be proved by the affidavit, affirmation, or statutory declaration of a witness to the execution thereof, that requirement is satisfied if the party thereto acknowledges, at a place outside Canada, the execution of the instrument and the party's signature thereto before a notary public, who thereupon executes and attaches thereto a certificate under the notary public's seal in Form A in the Schedule. Alternate acknowledgement 68(2) Where, under any Act of the Legislature, any person is required or authorized to swear or affirm, or to declare, any affidavit or statutory declaration that relates to, is intended to be attached or annexed to, any instrument or document to which subsection (1) applies, it is sufficient compliance with the requirements or authorization if, (a) that person, in lieu of making such an affidavit or statutory declaration, appears before a notary public at a place outside Canada and to the notary public certifies or declares that the matters otherwise required to be set out in such an affidavit or statutory declaration are true; and (b) the notary public executes and attaches to the instrument a certificate under their seal in Form B in the Schedule. Regulations 68.0.1 For the purpose of section 64.1, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations (a) authorizing a person or class of persons set out in subsection 62(1) or 63(1) to administer an oath, affirmation or statutory declaration without being in the presence of the deponent or declarant; (b) specifying the procedures to be followed for administering an oath, affirmation or statutory declaration; (c) if the person administering an oath, affirmation or statutory declaration and the deponent or declarant are in different jurisdictions, deeming the oath, affirmation or statutory declaration to be administered in a particular jurisdiction; (d) for an affidavit or a statutory declaration, prescribing wording to be included in or appended to it, including a form of jurat. S.M. 2020, c. 25, s. 1 . DIVISION VI CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS Definitions 68.1 The following definitions apply in this Division. "criminal organization" means a criminal organization as defined in section 2 of the Criminal Code (Canada). (« organisation criminelle ») "department " means the department of government over which the minister presides. (« ministère ») "director" means the director appointed under section 68.13. (« directeur ») "entity" means a group or organization, however structured, and includes a partnership, a corporation or an unincorporated association. (« entité ») "law enforcement agency" means (a) the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; (b) a municipal police service; or (c) an agency or organization designated by regulation. (« organisme d'application de la loi ») "review panel" means the panel appointed under section 68.14. (« comité d'examen ») "schedule" means the schedule of criminal organizations contained in a regulation made under section 68.2. (« liste ») S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Schedule of criminal organizations 68.2(1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may, by regulation, establish a schedule of criminal organizations. Entry on schedule of criminal organizations 68.2(2) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may place an entity on the schedule if, on the recommendation of the minister, the Lieutenant Governor in Council is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the entity is a criminal organization. Recommendation process 68.2(3) The minister may make a recommendation to the Lieutenant Governor in Council to add an entity to the schedule only in accordance with the process set out in sections 68.4 to 68.9. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Scheduled entity deemed to be criminal organization 68.3(1) When an entity is on the schedule it is deemed to be conclusive proof in an action or other legal proceeding that the entity is a criminal organization. Clarification 68.3(2) Subsection (1) does not affect the requirement to prove that a person is a member of a criminal organization. No inference if entity not on schedule 68.3(3) No inference is to be drawn from the fact that an entity is not on the schedule in an action or other legal proceeding where a person seeks to prove that an entity is a criminal organization. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Application 68.4(1) The director may apply to have an entity added to the schedule if the director has determined that the entity is a criminal organization. Contents of application 68.4(2) The application must (a) be made in writing to the minister; (b) identify the entity that is the subject of the application; and (c) provide detailed information setting out the basis on which the director has determined that the entity is a criminal organization, including one or both of the following: (i) information obtained by the director respecting the entity and its members, (ii) a decision, order or finding of a federal, provincial or territorial court that the entity is a criminal organization. Identifying entity 68.4(3) The application may identify the entity by specifying the name of the entity, the names by which the entity is commonly known or by providing other particulars of the entity. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Notice of application 68.5(1) The director must give public notice of the application in accordance with this section. Contents of notice 68.5(2) The notice of the application must include the following information: (a) the entity that is the subject of the application; (b) a statement that a member of the entity who objects to the application and wishes to make a submission to the review panel must file written notice of the member's objection at an address set out in the notice; (c) the deadline for an objection to be filed, which must be at least 30 days after public notice of the application was first given; (d) any other information prescribed by regulation. Publication of notice 68.5(3) The director must arrange for public notice of the application to be given (a) by publishing notice of the application on at least two occasions in a newspaper with general circulation throughout the province; (b) by posting notice of the application on the department's website; and (c) in any other manner that the director considers appropriate. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Objection process 68.6(1) If a member of an entity files an objection by the deadline set out in the notice of application, the director must give the objector a reasonable opportunity to review — at a location selected by the director — a statement that summarizes the information that led to the director's determination that the entity is a criminal organization. Contents of summary statement 68.6(2) The summary statement must be prepared by the director and must enable the objector to be reasonably informed of the basis on which the director determined that the entity is a criminal organization. Restriction on summary statement 68.6(3) The summary statement must not disclose any information that might (a) reveal the identity of a confidential informant, or otherwise jeopardize the safety of a person; or (b) negatively affect (i) an investigation or operation conducted by a law enforcement agency, or (ii) the utility of investigative or intelligence-gathering techniques used by a law enforcement agency. Copy of decision or order 68.6(4) When an application is based on a determination by a federal, provincial or territorial court that the entity is a criminal organization, the director must give the objector a copy of the decision or order in question. Submissions by objector 68.6(5) Within 30 days after being given an opportunity to review the summary statement, an objector may provide the director with a written submission that (a) responds to the information provided by the director in support of the application; and (b) sets out any additional arguments or evidence in support of the objector's position that the entity in question is not a criminal organization. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 . Submission of material 68.7 The director must give the following material to the review panel: (a) a copy of the application; (b) all material submitted by the director in support of the application; (c) any written submissions received from an objector. S.M. 2010, c. 23, s. 2 .