European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))

The Parliament interprets an exception for written questions as requiring urgency and that the question cannot wait until the next month; it also says the number of such questions must be below five per month.

AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.

Jurisdiction: European Union
Instrument: Decision
Citation: 52015DP0295
Version: Undated source snapshot
Language: en
Official source: View official record ↗

parliamentary procedure

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct access and API use, but this release emits noindex,follow for the following reason:

The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)

Statute overview

About this statute

This page preserves the statute’s identified version, provision structure, official source link, and stored legal text for reading and research.

Read the provisions Ask with citations

Search within this statute

Search all stored provisions in this version.

Legal text

Provisions of European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))

Showing 1 of 1

§
European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: The Parliament interprets an exception for written questions as requiring urgency and that the question cannot wait until the next month; it also says the number of such questions must be below five per month.

22.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/272 ---|---|---|--- * * * P8_TA(2015)0295 Questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG)) (2017/C 316/31) The European Parliament, — | having regard to the letter of 4 September 2015 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, ---|--- — | having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure, ---|--- | 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure: ‘The expression “by way of exception” is to be interpreted as meaning that the additional question concerns a matter of urgency and that the submission of that question cannot wait until the following month. Furthermore, the number of questions tabled under the second subparagraph of paragraph 3 must be smaller than the norm of five questions per month.’ ---|---|--- | 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. ---|---|--- * * *

Provision text is displayed from LexChat’s stored statute record. Use the official source links to verify amendments, commencement, and current legal force.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the legislation currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

AI-generated material is explicitly labelled and published only through LexChat's quality controls. It is a research aid, not the source document.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

About this statute

Search within this statute

Provisions of European Parliament decision of 9 September 2015 concerning the questions for written answer (interpretation of Rule 130(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (2015/2152(REG))

Ask AI about this statute

Sign in to ask AI about this statute