Miljöskyddslag

The environmental permit authority may decide the permit issue first and leave compensation to be decided later if a detailed damage investigation would unreasonably delay the case.

Ympäristölupaviranomainen voi tietyissä tilanteissa ratkaista lupa-asian ensin ja siirtää korvausasian myöhemmin käsiteltäväksi.

Valtion ympäristölupaviranomainen voi tietyissä tilanteissa ratkaista luvan myöntämisen ennen korvausasian lopullista käsittelyä, ja luvansaajan on hankittava tarvittava selvitys sekä tehtävä täydennyshakemus määräajassa.

The environmental permit authority may decide the permit issue first and postpone compensation matters if detailed damage investigation would unreasonably delay the permit decision. If there is special reason or needed evidence is missing, compensation for some damages may also be left for later, and the permit holder must obtain the needed investigation and file a supplementary application within the set time.

A permit applicant other than the state, municipality, or joint municipal authority must provide approved security for certain damages before starting the licensed activity, or within the time set by the permit authority if the activity has already started.

Muu hakija kuin valtio, kunta tai kuntayhtymä on velvoitettava asettamaan hyväksyttävä vakuus vahinkojen korvaamisesta ennen toiminnan aloittamista, tai myöhemmin lupaviranomaisen määräämässä ajassa.

Muu hakija kuin valtio, kunta tai kuntayhtymä on määrättävä asettamaan hyväksyttävä vakuus vahinkojen korvaamisesta ennen toiminnan aloittamista, tai jos toiminta on jo alkanut, viranomaisen määräämässä ajassa.

In the permit decision, applicants other than the state, a municipality, or a joint municipal authority must provide acceptable security for compensation of specified damages before starting the licensed activity, or within the time set by the permit authority if the activity has already started.

Muu hakija kuin valtio, kunta tai kuntayhtymä voidaan velvoittaa asettamaan vakuus 125 §:ssä tarkoitettujen vahinkojen korvaamisesta ennen toiminnan aloittamista, tai myöhemmin viranomaisen määräämässä ajassa.

Some permit applicants must provide an acceptable security deposit for damage compensation before starting the permitted activity, or within a time set by the permit authority if the activity has already started.

Muu hakija kuin valtio, kunta tai kuntayhtymä on velvoitettava asettamaan hyväksyttävä vakuus vahinkojen korvaamisesta ennen toiminnan aloittamista, tai viranomaisen määräämässä ajassa jos toiminta on jo alkanut.

A permit decision must require a non-state, non-municipal applicant to provide acceptable security for damage compensation before starting the permitted activity, or within the time set by the permit authority if activity has already begun.

Jos muutoksenhakutuomioistuin muuttaa ympäristölupapäätöstä niin, että korvausratkaisua pitää muuttaa, sen on siirrettävä korvauskysymys kokonaan tai osittain lupaviranomaiselle, ellei se voi itse muuttaa korvausratkaisua.

If an appeal court changes an environmental permit decision so that the compensation decision must also change, it must refer the compensation issue wholly or partly to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation decision itself.

If an appeal court changes an environmental permit decision in a way that requires the compensation ruling to change, it must send the compensation issue, in whole or in part, to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation ruling itself.

If an appellate court changes an environmental permit decision in a way that requires the compensation ruling to change, it must transfer the compensation issue to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation ruling itself.

If an appeal court changes an environmental permit decision so that the compensation ruling must also change, it must refer the compensation question to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation ruling itself.

If an appellate court changes an environmental permit decision and the compensation ruling must also change, the court must transfer the compensation question, in whole or part, to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation ruling itself.

If an appellate court changes an environmental permit decision so that the compensation ruling also needs changing, it must send the compensation issue to the permit authority unless it can change the compensation ruling itself.

If an appeals court changes an environmental permit decision and the compensation decision also needs to change, it must transfer the compensation question to the permitting authority unless it can change the compensation decision itself.

Valtion ympäristölupaviranomainen may, in connection with an environmental permit matter, handle a compensation claim for damage caused before the permit matter is resolved, if doing so does not cause material delay.

The state environmental permitting authority may hear a damages claim together with the permit matter if doing so does not cause a material delay. If it does not hear it together, it must handle the claim separately.

The state environmental permit authority may handle a damages claim together with the permit case if doing so does not cause substantial delay; otherwise, it must handle the claim as a separate matter.

The State environmental permit authority may handle a compensation claim in the permit case if doing so does not cause substantial delay; otherwise, it must handle the claim as a separate matter.

The State environmental permit authority may handle a compensation claim together with the permit matter if doing so does not cause substantial delay; otherwise it must handle the claim separately.

The State environmental permit authority may decide a compensation claim together with the environmental permit case if that does not cause substantial delay; otherwise, it must deal with the claim separately.

The state environmental permit authority may decide a damage compensation claim together with the permit matter if doing so does not cause substantial delay.

The state environmental permit authority may handle a damage compensation claim together with an environmental permit case if doing so will not cause substantial delay; otherwise, it must handle the claim as a separate matter.

Unforeseen environmental damage may be claimed by application to the state environmental permit authority.

Unforeseen damage compensation may be claimed from the state environmental permit authority by application.

Unforeseen damage not anticipated when an environmental permit was granted may be claimed by application to the state environmental permit authority.

Unforeseen damage related to an environmental permit may be claimed by application to the state environmental permit authority, even if there was an earlier compensation decision.

A claim for compensation for unforeseen damage may be made to the state environmental permit authority, and the same application may also cover damage caused by the same act contrary to the permit.

Hakemuksella voidaan vaatia korvausta vahingosta, jota ei ennakoitu ympäristölupaa myönnettäessä.

Unforeseen damage related to an environmental permit may be claimed from the state environmental permit authority by application, even if there is an earlier compensation decision.

Korvausta aiemmin ennakoimattomasta vahingosta voidaan hakea valtion ympäristölupaviranomaiselta, vaikka asiasta olisi jo tehty korvausratkaisu.

The district court must not take up certain damage claims if the same matter is already pending before a permit authority, must notify the state environmental permit authority when a compensation matter becomes pending, and may seek expert opinions in certain environmental cases.

The district court must leave certain damages claims unexamined when the same matter is already pending before a permit authority, and the state environmental permit authority must do the same when a related criminal case is pending in district court.

This section tells the district court and the state environmental permit authority when they must not process certain compensation claims, when the court must notify the environmental permit authority, and when the court or appeal court may ask for an expert opinion.

District courts must not examine certain compensation claims if the same matter is already pending before a permit authority; they must notify the state environmental permit authority when a compensation case is filed, and courts may seek expert opinions in complex environmental or water matters.

District courts must not examine certain compensation claims when the same matter is pending before a permit authority, and they must notify the state environmental permit authority when a compensation case is filed.

Courts must not examine certain damages claims when the same matter is already pending before the permit authority, and the state environmental permit authority must also leave certain compensation matters unexamined in parallel criminal-case situations.

Courts and the state environmental permit authority must not examine certain compensation claims when a related matter is already pending elsewhere; the district court must also notify the permit authority when a compensation case is filed.

A district court must not examine certain compensation claims if the same matter is pending before a permit authority, and the state environmental permit authority must not examine a compensation case if a related criminal case is pending in district court.

Lupaviranomainen may order special evidence to be obtained to resolve a compensation matter.

The permit authority may order special investigation evidence for resolving a compensation case, and the water act rules cited in the section apply to obtaining the evidence and to the compensation case.

Permit authority may order special evidence to be obtained to resolve a compensation case.

The permit authority may order special evidence to be obtained to resolve a compensation matter.

Lupaviranomainen may order special evidence to be obtained for deciding a compensation case.

The permitting authority may order special evidence to be obtained to resolve a compensation case.

The permit authority may order special evidence to be obtained for deciding a compensation matter.

Lupaviranomainen may order special investigation to resolve a compensation case, and certain Water Act rules apply to obtaining that investigation and to the compensation case.

The party whose activities caused soil or groundwater contamination must clean it up; if that party cannot be found or made to comply and the landholder knew of or consented to the contamination, the landholder must clean up the land, and the municipality must step in if the landholder cannot be compelled.

The polluter must clean contaminated soil and groundwater to a safe condition; if the polluter cannot be identified or made to act, the landholder may have to clean the soil and groundwater, and if the landholder cannot be required to do so, the municipality must investigate and clean up the soil.

The polluter must clean contaminated soil and groundwater; if the polluter cannot be identified or compelled, the landholder or, failing that, the municipality must act in some cases.

The person or entity whose activities caused soil or groundwater pollution must clean it up. If the polluter cannot be found or compelled, the landholder may have to clean the soil, and the municipality must step in if the landholder cannot be made to do so.

The party whose activities caused soil or groundwater pollution must clean it up; if the polluter cannot be identified or made to clean up, the landholder may have to clean the soil, and the municipality must act if the landholder cannot be required to do so.

The polluter must clean contaminated soil and groundwater; if the polluter cannot be identified or made to clean up, the landholder may have to clean the soil and groundwater, and if the landholder cannot be required to do so, the municipality must assess the cleanup need and clean the soil.

The party whose activities caused soil or groundwater contamination must clean it up so it no longer poses a health or environmental risk. If that party cannot be identified or made to clean up, the landholder may have to clean the soil and, in some cases, the groundwater; otherwise the municipality must investigate and clean up the soil.

The polluter must clean contaminated soil and groundwater; if the polluter cannot be identified or compelled, the landholder may have to clean the soil, and the municipality must step in if the holder cannot be ordered to do so.

The person who caused waste or another substance to enter soil or groundwater must immediately notify the supervisory authority if it may cause pollution.

If waste or another substance that may cause pollution enters soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately notify the supervisory authority.

If waste or another substance that may cause pollution enters soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately notify the supervisory authority.

If waste or another substance that may cause pollution has entered soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately notify the supervisory authority.

If waste or another substance that may cause pollution enters soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately notify the supervisory authority.

If a waste or other substance that may cause pollution has entered soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately notify the supervisory authority.

If waste or another substance that may cause pollution has entered soil or groundwater, the person responsible must immediately report it to the supervisory authority.

Jos maaperään tai pohjaveteen pääsee jätettä tai muuta pilaantumista aiheuttavaa ainetta, aiheuttajan on ilmoitettava siitä heti valvontaviranomaiselle.

If contamination of soil or groundwater is suspected, the person responsible for remediation must assess the contamination and cleanup need and submit the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If contamination of soil or groundwater is suspected, the responsible party must assess contamination and cleanup need and deliver the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If contaminated soil or groundwater is suspected, the person responsible for remediation must assess contamination and remediation need and submit the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If there is reason to suspect soil or groundwater contamination, the responsible party must assess contamination and remediation needs and submit the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If there is reason to suspect soil or groundwater contamination, the person responsible for remediation must assess contamination and the need for cleanup and submit the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If contamination is suspected, the person responsible for cleanup must assess the contaminated area and remediation need and submit the report to the state supervisory authority.

If there is reason to suspect soil or groundwater contamination, the person responsible for remediation must assess contamination and cleanup needs and submit the assessment to the state supervisory authority.

If soil or groundwater pollution is suspected, the responsible party must assess contamination and remediation needs and submit the report to the state supervisory authority.

Pilaantuneen maaperän ja pohjaveden puhdistaminen voidaan aloittaa ilmoituksella valtion valvontaviranomaiselle, jos ympäristölupaa ei vaadita.

Contaminated soil or groundwater remediation may begin by notifying the state supervisory authority, if no environmental permit is required; the notification must be filed at least 45 days before the key work phase starts.

Pilaantuneen maaperän ja pohjaveden puhdistamisesta voidaan aloittaa ilmoittamalla asiasta valtion valvontaviranomaiselle, jos ympäristölupaa ei tarvita.

To remediate contaminated soil or groundwater without an environmental permit, a notification must be filed with the state supervisory authority at least 45 days before the essential work phase starts.

Pilaantuneen maaperän ja pohjaveden puhdistamisesta voidaan ryhtyä ilmoituksella valtion valvontaviranomaiselle, jos ympäristölupaa ei tarvita, ja ilmoitus on tehtävä viimeistään 45 vuorokautta ennen olennaisen työvaiheen alkua.

A contaminated-soil or groundwater cleanup may begin by notifying the state supervisory authority if an environmental permit is not otherwise required; the notice must be filed at least 45 days before the key work phase starts.

Contaminated soil and groundwater remediation may begin by notifying the state supervisory authority, unless the work requires an environmental permit; the notice must be filed no later than 45 days before the essential work phase starts.

Pilaantuneen maaperän ja pohjaveden puhdistamisesta voidaan aloittaa tekemällä ilmoitus valtion valvontaviranomaiselle, jos ympäristölupaa ei tarvita; ilmoitus on tehtävä viimeistään 45 vuorokautta ennen työn olennaista vaihetta.

Valtion valvontaviranomaisen on määrätty puhdistamaan pilaantunut maaperä tai pohjavesi, jos vastuullinen ei ryhdy siihen.

The state supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater unless the person responsible under section 133 starts cleaning up. It may also order other necessary measures, and if groundwater is significantly polluted it must order the responsible person to take corrective measures.

The supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater if the party responsible under section 133 does not act.

The state supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater if the responsible party does not start it; it may also order other needed measures, and must require remedial actions if groundwater is significantly contaminated.

The state supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater if the party responsible under section 133 does not act.

The supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater unless the responsible party starts cleaning it up.

The state supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater unless the person responsible under section 133 has already taken action.

The state supervisory authority must order cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater unless the person responsible under section 133 starts doing it.

Ympäristöministeriö voi kunnanhakemuksesta siirtää tässä luvussa tarkoitettujen pilaantunutta maaperää ja pohjavettä koskevien asioiden toimivallan kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomaiselle, jos edellytykset täyttyvät.

The Environment Ministry may transfer competence, on a municipality’s request and after hearing state authorities, so the municipal environmental protection authority becomes the competent authority for certain contaminated soil and groundwater matters, except section 133(3).

The Ministry of the Environment may, on a municipality’s application and after hearing certain state authorities, transfer competence in certain contaminated soil and groundwater matters to the municipal environmental protection authority, subject to stated conditions.

The Ministry of the Environment may transfer competence in certain contaminated soil and groundwater matters to the municipal environmental protection authority, if the statutory conditions are met.

The Ministry of the Environment may transfer decision-making authority in certain contaminated soil and groundwater matters to a municipal environmental protection authority, if the legal conditions are met.

Ympäristöministeriö voi kunnan hakemuksesta siirtää tietyissä pilaantunutta maaperää ja pohjavettä koskevissa asioissa toimivallan kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomaiselle, jos edellytykset täyttyvät.

The Environment Ministry may transfer certain environmental case authority to a municipal environmental protection authority, if the legal conditions are met.

Ympäristöministeriö voi kunnan hakemuksesta siirtää tietyissä pilaantunutta maaperää ja pohjavettä koskevissa asioissa toimivallan kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomaiselle.

The transferor or lessee of a land area must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the site, contamination-related waste or substances, and any studies or cleanup measures.

When a land area is transferred or leased, the transferor or lessor must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the area, contamination-related waste or substances, and any investigations or cleanup measures.

Maa-alueen luovuttajan tai vuokraajan on annettava uudelle omistajalle tai haltijalle tiedot alueen toiminnasta, mahdollisista pilaavista jätteistä tai aineista sekä tutkimuksista tai puhdistustoimista.

Land transferors or lessees must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the land, contamination-related waste or substances, and any investigations or cleanup measures.

When a land area is transferred, the transferor or lessee must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the site, waste or substances that may have caused contamination, and any investigations or cleanup measures.

When land is transferred, the transferor or tenant must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the land, waste or substances that may have caused soil or groundwater pollution, and any studies or remediation done there.

Land transferors or lessees must give the new owner or holder available information about activities on the land, possible pollution-related waste or substances, and any investigations or cleanup measures.

Land transferors or lessees must give the new owner or holder available information about activity on the site, contamination-related waste or substances, and any investigations or cleanup measures.

Everyone should aim for surface water quality where harmful substances do not cause health harm or other significant harm or risk. The Government may set environmental quality requirements for protecting surface water quality and may also provide exceptions if needed to implement EU law.

The Government may issue environmental quality requirements for surface waters, and may also issue exceptions when needed to implement EU law.

All activities should aim for surface-water quality that does not cause harm to human health or other significant harmful effects from dangerous or harmful aquatic substances.

This section aims to protect surface water quality so that hazardous substances do not cause health harm or other significant harmful effects or risks.

The Government may set environmental quality requirements for surface waters and may also set exemptions, if needed to implement EU law.

Everyone must aim for surface-water quality that prevents health harm or other significant harmful effects from dangerous or harmful substances.

All activities should aim for surface water quality where dangerous or harmful aquatic substances do not cause health harm or significant other adverse effects or risks.

Pintavesien laatua on tavoiteltava niin, ettei vesiympäristölle vaarallisista tai haitallisista aineista aiheudu terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää seurausta tai sen vaaraa. Valtioneuvosto voi antaa asetuksella ympäristönlaatuvaatimuksia ja tietyissä tilanteissa niihin poikkeuksia.

Everyone carrying on activity should aim for air quality where dangerous or harmful substances do not occur in amounts causing health harm or other significant effects.

All activity should aim for air quality that does not contain dangerous or harmful substances in amounts causing health harm or other significant effects.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on tavoiteltava ilmanlaatua, jossa vaarallisia tai haitallisia aineita ei ole terveyshaittaa tai merkittäviä muita seurauksia aiheuttavina määrinä. Valtioneuvoston asetuksella voidaan antaa tätä varten laatua koskevia vaatimuksia ja tavoitteita sekä tietyissä tapauksissa poikkeuksia.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä ilmanlaatuun, jossa vaarallisia tai haitallisia aineita ei ole terveyshaittaa tai merkittäviä muita seurauksia aiheuttavina määrinä. Valtioneuvosto voi antaa asetuksella ilmanlaadun turvaamiseen liittyviä laatuvaatimuksia, tavoitteita ja tietyissä tapauksissa poikkeuksia.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä sellaiseen ilmanlaatuun, ettei vaarallisia tai haitallisia aineita tai yhdisteitä ole terveydelle haitallisina tai muuten merkittävinä määrinä. Valtioneuvosto voi antaa asetuksella ilmanlaadun turvaamiseen liittyviä laatuvaatimuksia ja -tavoitteita sekä tietyin edellytyksin poikkeuksia niihin.

All activities should aim for air quality where hazardous or harmful substances do not occur in amounts causing health harm or other significant effects.

All activities should aim for air quality where harmful or dangerous substances are not present in amounts that cause health harm or other significant effects; the Government Decree may set environmental quality requirements, targets, and certain exceptions.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on tavoiteltava ilmanlaatua, jossa haitallisia aineita ei ole terveydelle haitallisina määrinä; valtioneuvosto voi antaa tarkempia ympäristönlaatuvaatimuksia, tavoitteita, poikkeuksia ja muita päästövähennysvelvoitteita.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on tavoiteltava sellaista ääniympäristön laatua, ettei vaarallista tai haitallista melua synny terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää seurausta aiheuttavassa määrin.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on tavoiteltava ääniympäristöä, jossa melu ei aiheuta terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää haittaa.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä sellaiseen ääniympäristön laatuun, jossa vaarallista tai haitallista melua ei esiinny terveyshaittaa tai merkittävää muuta seurausta aiheuttavassa määrin.

All activities should aim for a sound environment where dangerous or harmful noise does not cause health harm or other significant adverse effects.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä sellaiseen ääniympäristön laatuun, jossa haitallista melua ei esiinny terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää seurausta aiheuttavassa määrin.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä siihen, että haitallista melua ei esiinny terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää seurausta aiheuttavassa määrin.

Kaikessa toiminnassa on pyrittävä sellaiseen ääniympäristöön, jossa haitallista melua ei ole terveyshaittaa tai muuta merkittävää seurausta aiheuttavassa määrin.

In all activities, noise quality should be pursued so that harmful noise does not occur at a level causing health harm or another significant result or risk; the Government may issue decree-based environmental quality requirements and targets for that purpose.

Kunnat and state authorities must monitor environmental status, with special regional air-quality monitoring duties in the Helsinki metropolitan area and reporting/publication obligations for the monitoring data.

Kunnan, valtion valvontaviranomaisen ja eräiden muiden viranomaisten on huolehdittava ympäristön tilan seurannasta ja seurantatiedot on julkaistava sekä toimitettava EU:lle lain edellyttämällä tavalla.

Kunta ja valtion valvontaviranomainen vastaavat ympäristön tilan seurannasta omilla alueillaan, ja tietyt viranomaiset sekä Helsingin seudun kunnat hoitavat tarkempia ilmanlaatu- ja muuta seurantaa koskevia tehtäviä.

This section requires municipalities and certain state bodies to monitor environmental conditions, air quality, and related ecological effects, and to publish and report monitoring data.

Municipalities and state supervisory authorities must monitor environmental conditions in their areas, and Helsinki-region cities must jointly monitor air quality, including continuous PM2.5 monitoring at one fixed urban background station.

Kunnat and the state supervisory authority must monitor environmental conditions in their areas; in the Helsinki capital region, Espoo, Helsinki, Kauniainen, and Vantaa must jointly monitor air quality and keep continuous PM2.5 monitoring at one permanent urban background station.

Kunnat, the state supervisory authority, and in the capital region Espoo, Helsinki, Kauniainen and Vantaa have environmental and air-quality monitoring duties; monitoring data must be published and reported, and the Government may issue more detailed rules.

Kuntien, valtion valvontaviranomaisten ja useiden erillisten viranomaisten on huolehdittava ympäristön tilan seurannasta; seurantatiedot on myös julkaistava, niistä on tiedotettava ja tietoja toimitettava EU:lle.

The municipality must use available means to secure good air quality in its area, and it may issue orders to restrict or suspend certain non-permit and non-registration activities to implement air-quality plans.

Kunnan on turvattava hyvä ilmanlaatu alueellaan käytettävissä olevin keinoin, ja kunta voi tietyissä suunnitelmien toimeenpanoissa antaa määräyksiä muiden kuin luvanvaraisten ja rekisteröitävien toimintojen rajoittamisesta tai keskeyttämisestä.

The municipality must use available means to secure good air quality in its area. It may also issue orders to restrict or suspend non-permit and non-registrable activities to carry out air-quality plans.

The municipality must protect good air quality in its area and may issue orders to restrict or suspend non-permit and non-registrable activities to carry out air-quality plans.

Kunnan on turvattava hyvä ilmanlaatu alueellaan käytettävissä olevin keinoin, ja se voi antaa määräyksiä tiettyjen toimintojen rajoittamisesta tai keskeyttämisestä ilmanlaatusuunnitelmien toteuttamiseksi.

The municipality must use available means to secure good air quality in its area, taking account of the environmental quality requirements and targets in section 141.

The municipality must use available means to safeguard good air quality in its area, taking account of the environmental quality requirements and targets in section 141.

Kunnan on turvattava hyvä ilmanlaatu alueellaan käytettävissä olevin keinoin, ja se voi antaa määräyksiä tiettyjen toimintojen rajoittamisesta tai keskeyttämisestä ilmanlaatusuunnitelmien toteuttamiseksi.

Kunnan on laadittava ilmanlaadun parantamiseksi ilmansuojelusuunnitelma, jos ilman epäpuhtauksien raja-arvo ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä, ellei kyse ole PM10-raja-arvoista.

The municipality must prepare an air protection plan when a limit value for air pollutants is exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, unless the case concerns PM10 limit values; it may also prepare such a plan for ozone target values.

A municipality must prepare an air protection plan when an air-pollutant limit value is exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, with some exceptions and content requirements.

Municipalities must prepare an air protection plan when a section 141 air-pollutant limit value is exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, unless the case concerns PM10 limit values under section 148.

The municipality must prepare an air protection plan when an air pollutant limit value is exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, unless the case concerns PM10 limit values under section 148.

Kunnan on laadittava ilmansuojelusuunnitelma, kun ilman epäpuhtauksien raja-arvo ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä, ellei kyse ole PM10-raja-arvosta; kunta voi myös tehdä suunnitelman otsonin tavoitearvojen saavuttamiseksi.

Kunnan on laadittava ilmansuojelusuunnitelma, kun ilman epäpuhtauksien raja-arvo ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä, paitsi PM 10 -tilanteissa.

The municipality must prepare an air protection plan when an air pollutant limit value is exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, unless the case concerns PM10 limit values under section 148. The municipality may also prepare a plan for ozone target values.

Kunnan on laadittava lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma, kun rikkidioksidin tai typpidioksidin varoituskynnys ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä; otsonin osalta suunnitelma tehdään vain, jos siitä on hyötyä ylityksen vaaran, keston tai vakavuuden vähentämisessä.

Kunnan on laadittava lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma, kun tietyt ilmanlaadun varoituskynnykset ylittyvät tai ovat vaarassa ylittyä; joissakin tilanteissa kunta voi tehdä suunnitelman myös omasta harkinnastaan.

The municipality must prepare a short-term action plan when certain air-quality warning thresholds are exceeded or at risk of being exceeded.

Kunnan on laadittava lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma, kun rikkidioksidin tai typpidioksidin varoituskynnys ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä; otsonin osalta suunnitelma vaaditaan vain, jos siitä on hyötyä vaaran, keston tai vakavuuden vähentämisessä.

Municipalities must prepare a short-term action plan when sulphur dioxide or nitrogen dioxide warning thresholds are exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, and sometimes for ozone thresholds too.

Kunnan on laadittava lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma, kun rikkidioksidin tai typpidioksidin varoituskynnys ylittyy tai on vaarassa ylittyä; otsonin osalta suunnitelma vaaditaan vain, jos siitä on hyötyä ylityksen vaaran, keston tai vakavuuden vähentämisessä.

Kunnan on laadittava lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma, kun tietyt ilmanlaadun varoituskynnykset ylittyvät tai ovat vaarassa ylittyä; otsonin osalta velvollisuus syntyy vain, jos suunnitelmalla voidaan vähentää vaaraa, kestoa tai vakavuutta.

The municipality must prepare a short-term action plan when sulfur dioxide or nitrogen dioxide warning thresholds are exceeded or at risk of being exceeded, and sometimes for ozone warnings too.

Kunnan on laadittava ilmansuojelusuunnitelma ja lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma määräajassa, kuultava viranomaisia ja yleisöä sekä toimitettava valmiit suunnitelmat tiedoksi viranomaisille.

Kunnan on toimitettava vuosittain 15. toukokuuta mennessä tiedot ilmansuojelusuunnitelman toimista ja mahdollisista tarkistuksista viranomaisille.

The municipality must submit annual information by 15 May and air-protection and short-term action plans must be prepared within the stated deadlines after limit values or warning thresholds are exceeded or risked.

Kunnan on laadittava ilmansuojelusuunnitelma ja lyhyen aikavälin toimintasuunnitelma määräajoissa, kuultava viranomaisia ja muita asianosaisia sekä toimitettava ja tiedotettava suunnitelmista säädetyllä tavalla.

The municipality must send annual information by 15 May to the state supervisory authority and the Ministry of the Environment about measures carried out under the air protection plan and any plan revisions.

Kunnan on toimitettava vuosittain 15. toukokuuta mennessä tiedot ilmansuojelusuunnitelman toteutetuista toimista ja mahdollisista tarkistuksista valtion valvontaviranomaiselle ja ympäristöministeriölle.

Kunnan on toimitettava vuosittain viimeistään 15. toukokuuta tiedot ilmansuojelusuunnitelman toteutetuista toimista ja mahdollisesta tarkistamisesta valtion valvontaviranomaiselle ja ympäristöministeriölle.

Kunnan on toimitettava vuosittain tiedot ilmansuojelusuunnitelman toimista ja tarkistuksista määräaikaan mennessä. Suunnitelmia koskee myös määräaikoja laatimiselle sekä lausunto- ja mielipidevaihe.

Kunta may replace an air protection plan with a report about PM10 limit exceedances caused by winter road sanding or salting, and must prepare it within seven months and follow participation and consultation rules.

If PM10 limits are exceeded because of winter road sanding or salting, the municipality may file a report instead of an air protection plan, and it must do so within seven months after the end of the year when the limit was first exceeded.

A municipality may use a special report instead of an air protection plan when PM10 limit values are exceeded due to sanding or salting from winter road maintenance, but it must prepare the report within seven months and follow public participation/opinion rules.

Kunta may replace an air protection plan with a report in certain PM10 exceedance areas and must prepare the report within seven months after the year of the first exceedance.

Kunta may replace an air protection plan with a report when PM10 limits are exceeded because of sanding or salting for winter road maintenance.

The municipality may prepare a report instead of an air protection plan when PM10 limits are exceeded due to winter road gritting or salting; the report must be prepared within 7 months and must include required participation and authority consultation steps.

If PM10 limits are exceeded because of winter road sanding or salting, the municipality may prepare a report instead of an air protection plan, and must do so within seven months after the year of the first exceedance.

Kunta may prepare a report instead of an air protection plan when PM10 limit values are exceeded because of winter road sanding or salting; the report must be completed within 7 months after the end of the year of the first exceedance.

The Environment Ministry and Finnish Environment Institute have reporting, updating, and publication duties for emissions inventory and air protection planning; some emissions are exempt from the national reduction obligations.

This section sets emission-reduction rules for certain air pollutants, with exemptions for some emissions, and assigns reporting and planning duties to the Finnish Environment Institute and the Ministry of the Environment.

Certain emissions must be reduced, and the environment ministry and Finnish Environment Institute have reporting and programme duties.

Certain emissions must be reduced in the covered areas, and specific authorities must prepare, update, and publish emissions inventories and an air protection programme.

The municipality must promote the quality of the sound environment in its area, taking account of the environmental quality requirements and objectives in section 142.

The municipality must promote the quality of the sound environment in its area, taking into account the environmental quality requirements and targets in section 142.

The municipality must promote the quality of the sound environment in its area, taking into account the environmental quality requirements and targets in section 142.

Certain air-pollution emissions must be reduced in designated areas, with some exclusions, and authorities must prepare, update, and publish inventories and an air pollution programme.

Kunnan on edistettävä ääniympäristön laatua alueellaan ja otettava huomioon 142 §:n ympäristönlaatuvaatimukset ja -tavoitteet.

The municipality must promote sound environment quality in its area, taking into account the environmental quality requirements and objectives in section 142.

The municipality must promote the quality of the sound environment in its area, taking into account the environmental quality requirements and targets in section 142.

The municipality must promote the realization of good sound environment quality in its area, taking into account the environmental quality requirements and objectives in section 142.

Noise studies and noise management action plans must be prepared for certain large population centres, roads, railways, and civil aviation airports within the deadline set in Directive 2002/49/EC.

Noise assessments and noise-control action plans must be prepared for specified large population centers, major roads, railways, and certain airports within the deadline set in Article 8 of Directive 2002/49/EC.

Noise surveys and noise abatement action plans must be prepared within the deadline set by Article 8 of Directive 2002/49/EC for the listed population centres, roads, railways and airports.

The municipality must promote sound environment quality in its area, taking account of the environmental quality requirements and goals in section 142.

Meluselvitys ja meluntorjunnan toimintasuunnitelma on laadittava tietyissä liikennemäärä- ja väestökriteerit täyttävissä kohteissa määräajassa, ja valtioneuvoston asetuksella voidaan antaa tarkempia säännöksiä sisällöstä ja tunnusluvuista.

Noise surveys and noise abatement action plans must be prepared for specified high-traffic population centres, roads, railways, and airports within the deadline in Directive 2002/49/EC.

Meluselvitys ja meluntorjunnan toimintasuunnitelma on laadittava säädetyssä määräajassa tietyistä suurista väestökeskittymistä, teistä, rautateistä ja lentoasemista.

Noise surveys and noise control action plans must be prepared for certain large population centres, busy public roads, railways, and civil aviation airports.