Miljöskyddslag

When assessing the significance of water pollution, the water body and marine environment status and use factors set out in the relevant water management or marine management plan must be taken into account; the Government may issue more detailed rules.

The supervisory authority may use a non-official assistant for a section 172 task, but the assistant must be suitably qualified and may enter a permanently inhabited space only together with an authority, official, or public servant.

When assessing the significance of water pollution, the matters stated in the water management or marine management plan for the affected area must be taken into account, and the Government may issue more detailed rules on the assessment.

If certain pollution or nature damage occurs, the state supervisory authority must order the operator to carry out corrective measures.

When assessing the significance of water pollution, the assessment must take into account relevant water management or marine management plans, and the Government may issue more detailed rules on the assessment.

When assessing the significance of water pollution under section 176, the assessment must take into account relevant matters in the water management or marine management plan for the area affected by the activity. The Government may issue more detailed rules on how significance is assessed.

When assessing the significance of water pollution under section 176, the assessment must take account of matters stated in the relevant water management or marine management plan. The Government may issue more detailed rules on how the significance is assessed and what factors are considered.

When assessing the significance of water pollution, the assessment must take into account information in the applicable water management or marine management plan about the condition and use of waters and the marine environment in the area affected by the activity.

The operator must notify the state supervisory authority immediately about significant water pollution, environmental damage, or an immediate threat of either.

Määräaikaistarkastuksissa ja muissa valvonnallisissa tarkastuksissa sovelletaan hallintolain 39 §:ää; tarkastuksen kohteena olevalla toiminnan harjoittajalla tai muun tarkastettavan kohteen, tuotteen, tilan tai alueen haltijalla on tässä yhteydessä asianosaisasema, ja valtioneuvoston asetuksella voidaan antaa tarkempia säännöksiä tarkastuksen toteuttamisesta, tarkastuskertomuksesta ja tiedoksiannosta.

The operator must report significant water pollution, nature damage, or an immediate threat of either to the state supervisory authority without delay.

When assessing the significance of water pollution under section 176, the assessment must also take account of matters stated in a water management or marine management plan about the condition and use of waters and the marine environment in the area affected by the activity.

The operator must immediately notify the state supervisory authority of significant water pollution or environmental damage, and of an immediate threat of either.

Toiminnanharjoittajan on ilmoitettava viipymättä valtion valvontaviranomaiselle 176 §:ssä tarkoitetusta merkittävästä vesistön pilaantumisesta ja luontovahingosta sekä niiden välittömästä uhasta.

Toiminnanharjoittajan on ilmoitettava viipymättä valtion valvontaviranomaiselle 176 §:ssä tarkoitetusta vesistön merkittävästä pilaantumisesta ja luontovahingosta sekä niiden välittömästä uhasta.

Toiminnanharjoittajan on viipymättä ilmoitettava valtion valvontaviranomaiselle merkittävästä vesistön pilaantumisesta, luontovahingosta ja niiden välittömästä uhasta.

If the law or its rules are not followed, the supervisory authority must tell the actor to stop the non-compliant conduct and take steps to start coercive enforcement proceedings; it must also monitor compliance with any order or prohibition.

Valvontaviranomainen voi määrätä rikkomuksen keskeytettäväksi, velvollisuuden täytettäväksi, ympäristö haitan poistettavaksi tai ympäristön palautettavaksi ennalleen sekä vaatia toiminnan ympäristövaikutusten selvittämistä tietyissä epäilytilanteissa.

If the law or rules made under it are not followed, the supervisory authority must tell the conduct to stop and take steps to start an enforcement matter; it must also monitor compliance with the instruction and any related prohibition or order.

The operator must notify the state supervisory authority immediately about significant water pollution or nature damage under section 176, and about any immediate threat of those harms.

If the law or rules made under it are not followed, the supervisory authority must order the unlawful conduct to stop and take steps to start coercive enforcement proceedings.

Valvontaviranomaisen on puututtava lainvastaisen menettelyn jatkumiseen ja valvottava, että annetut kehotukset, kiellot ja määräykset noudatetaan.

The supervisory authority must tell a person to stop unlawful conduct and take steps to start coercive measures when the law is not followed, and it must monitor compliance with the instruction and any resulting ban or order.

Valvontaviranomaisen on puututtava lainvastaiseen menettelyyn ja valvottava määräysten noudattamista.

Kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen voi tarkastuksen perusteella antaa yksittäisen määräyksen pilaantumisen ehkäisemiseksi.

The state supervisory authority must order an operator to take corrective measures if a serious water pollution or nature damage results from a breach or neglect, and also when such damage results from an accident or other unforeseen cause.

The municipal environmental protection authority may issue an individual order, based on an inspection, to prevent pollution from risky activities.

If this Act or rules made under it are not followed, the supervisory authority must tell the conduct to stop and take steps to start coercive administrative proceedings; it must also monitor compliance with any warning, prohibition, or order given in those proceedings.

The municipal environmental protection authority may issue an individual order, after an inspection, to prevent pollution from a risky activity, but not for permit-based, notification-based, or registerable activities.

The municipal environmental protection authority may issue an individual order, after inspection, to prevent pollution from risky activity.

The municipal environmental protection authority may, after an inspection, issue an individual order to prevent pollution for activities that create a risk of environmental pollution.

Kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen voi tarkastuksen perusteella antaa yksittäisen määräyksen ympäristön pilaantumisen ehkäisemiseksi.

Environmental supervisory authorities must suspend harmful activity when there is immediate danger to human health or immediate major harm to the environment, if the operator has not taken sufficient measures.

When assessing the significance of water pollution, the water management and marine management plans must be taken into account, and more detailed rules are issued by Government Decree.

Valvontaviranomaisen on keskeytettävä toiminta, jos siitä aiheutuu välitön vaara terveydelle tai merkittävä välitön haitta ympäristölle eikä toiminnanharjoittaja ole ryhtynyt riittäviin toimiin.

The municipal environmental protection authority may issue a specific order, based on its inspection, to prevent pollution for activities that may cause environmental harm.

The supervisory authority must suspend harmful activity when there is immediate danger to human health or serious immediate environmental harm and the operator has not taken sufficient measures.

If an activity posing a risk of environmental pollution creates immediate danger to human health or immediate and significant harm to the environment, the supervisory authority must suspend the activity as needed unless the operator has already taken sufficient measures.

Valvontaviranomaisen on keskeytettävä toiminta, jos se on tarpeen terveyden tai ympäristön suojelemiseksi eikä toiminnanharjoittaja ole ryhtynyt riittäviin toimenpiteisiin.

The supervisory authority must suspend harmful activity when there is immediate danger to human health or serious immediate harm to the environment, if the operator has not taken adequate measures.

In an urgent case, a subordinate official may issue or carry out certain environmental prohibitions/orders on behalf of the municipal environmental protection authority, but must promptly submit the decision to the authority.

The operator must immediately report significant water pollution, environmental damage, and any immediate threat of them to the state supervisory authority.

In urgent cases, a municipal environmental protection authority’s designated official may issue or carry out certain prohibitions, orders, or suspensions, but must promptly submit the matter to the authority for decision.

Valvontaviranomaisen on keskeytettävä toiminta, jos siitä aiheutuu välitön terveysvaara tai merkittäviä välittömiä ympäristöhaittoja eikä toiminnanharjoittaja ole itse ryhtynyt riittäviin toimiin.

In urgent cases, a municipal environmental official may issue a prohibition, order, or suspension on the authority’s behalf, and must submit it to the municipal environmental authority without delay. In serious pollution-risk situations, the state supervisory authority may take necessary emergency measures, if the stated conditions are met.

In urgent cases, a municipal environmental officer can issue a ban/order or carry out a suspension on behalf of the municipal environmental authority, and the officer must submit the measure for the authority’s decision without delay.

In urgent environmental cases, a designated official may issue a prohibition, order, or suspension on behalf of the municipal environmental authority, and must submit it promptly to that authority for decision.

In urgent cases, a municipal environmental official may issue a prohibition, order, or suspension, but must immediately submit it to the municipal environmental authority; state supervisors may also take necessary emergency measures in serious pollution-risk situations.

If certain environmental rules are breached, the Environment Ministry and specified agencies may ban activities, stop unlawful products from being sold or used, and order compliance or waste treatment.

Valvontaviranomaisen on puututtava lain tai sen nojalla annettujen säännösten tai määräysten vastaiseen menettelyyn ja valvottava annettujen kehotusten, kieltojen ja määräysten noudattamista.

If certain environmental or type-approval rules are breached, the Environment Ministry and other named authorities may prohibit continued activity, ban use/sale/distribution, require compliance, require waste handling, or order market removal.

In urgent cases, a municipal environmental protection officer may temporarily issue certain prohibitions, orders, or suspensions, and a state supervisory authority may take necessary measures to prevent or limit serious environmental harm. The officer must promptly submit the measure to the municipal environmental protection authority, and the responsible party must cover the authority’s costs.

If certain regulations are breached, several authorities may prohibit continued activity, ban non-compliant products or equipment, require correction, order disposal as waste, or order removal from the market.

If certain environmental or type-approval rules are breached, the authorities may prohibit continued activity, bar use or sale of non-compliant goods and order corrective action, waste handling, or market withdrawal.

If certain environmental or type-approval rules are violated, the environment ministry and some other authorities may ban activities, stop non-compliant products or equipment from being used or sold, order compliance, or require waste treatment or market withdrawal.

If certain regulation breaches occur, several authorities may prohibit continued activity, ban non-compliant products or equipment from use or sale, and order corrective action or removal from the market.

Authorities must usually back up bans or orders issued under this Act with a coercive fine, performance at the violator’s expense, or suspension, unless that is clearly unnecessary.

Kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen voi tarkastuksen perusteella antaa yksittäisen määräyksen ympäristön pilaantumisen vaaraa aiheuttavasta toiminnasta, jos se on tarpeen pilaantumisen ehkäisemiseksi.

Authority must reinforce certain bans or orders with a conditional fine or similar coercive measure, unless that is obviously unnecessary.

If certain environmental or technical rules are breached, several authorities may prohibit, order correction, or require removal from the market of non-compliant substances, products, equipment, or machinery.

Viranomaisen on yleensä tehostettava tämän lain mukaista kieltoa tai määräystä uhkasakolla tai muulla uhalla, mutta ei, jos se on ilmeisen tarpeetonta. Lisäksi tiettyä uhkaa ei saa käyttää 180 §:n määräyksen tehosteena, eikä uhkasakon avulla saatuja tietoja saa käyttää luonnollisen henkilön rikosvastuuseen saattamiseksi tietyissä menettelyissä.

Viranomaisen on yleensä tehostettava lain nojalla antamaansa kieltoa tai määräystä uhkasakolla tai teettämis- tai keskeyttämisuhalla, ellei se ole ilmeisen tarpeetonta, mutta uhkaa ei saa käyttää 180 §:n määräyksen tehosteena.

Authorities must usually back up orders or prohibitions with a conditional fine, performance at the violator’s expense, or a suspension threat, unless that is clearly unnecessary.

Authorities must usually reinforce a ban or order with a conditional fine or other coercive measure, unless that is clearly unnecessary, and they may not use that measure for an order made under section 180.

Viranomaisen on ennen tämän luvun määräyksen antamista varattava määräyksen kohteelle tilaisuus tulla kuulluksi.

Supervisory authorities must stop activity when it creates immediate health or serious environmental risk and the operator has not taken sufficient measures.

Before issuing an order under this chapter, the authority must give the affected person an opportunity to be heard. If needed, the authority must also hear other parties and certain supervising or permit authorities.

Authorities must usually reinforce prohibitions or orders with a fine threat or other coercive measure, but not for an order under section 180, and certain threat-based information may not be used in criminal proceedings.

Before issuing an order under this chapter, the authority must give the affected person a chance to be heard, and if needed also hear other parties and certain supervisory/licensing/public-interest authorities.

Before issuing an order under this chapter, the authority must give the affected person a chance to be heard; if needed, it must also hear other parties and relevant supervisory, permit, and public-interest authorities.

Before issuing an order in this chapter, the authority must give the person concerned a chance to be heard, and may also need to hear other parties and certain authorities.

Before issuing an order under this chapter, the authority must give the affected person an opportunity to be heard, and if needed also hear other parties and specified supervisory or licensing authorities.

Several named actors may file certain environmental matters in writing when the matter has not been initiated by the supervisory authority.

In an urgent case, an official appointed by the municipal environmental protection authority may issue a ban or order, or carry out a suspension, on the authority’s behalf.

Certain parties may start specified environmental matters in writing, unless the matter was already initiated by the supervisory authority.

Before issuing an order under this chapter, the authority must give the affected person a chance to be heard, and it must also hear certain other parties if needed.

If a listed environmental matter was not started by the supervisory authority, several named parties may file it in writing.

If a matter has not been initiated by the supervisory authority, several listed parties may initiate it in writing.

Certain listed parties may initiate the matter in writing if it was not started by the supervisory authority.

Certain listed parties may start a matter in writing if it was not initiated by the supervisory authority.

Tulli must give assistance in supervising compliance with this Act and its rules, and supervisory authorities must give each other assistance on request for tasks under this Act.

Jos tiettyä valtioneuvoston asetusta rikotaan, ympäristöministeriö tai muu toimivaltainen viranomainen voi kieltää toimintaa, kieltää sääntöjen vastaisen tuotteen käytön tai myynnin, määrätä korjaamaan rikkomuksen tai ohjata esineen jätteenkäsittelyyn.

Customs must give official assistance when supervising compliance with this Act and regulations made under it. Supervisory authorities must also give each other official assistance on request to carry out their statutory tasks.

Several listed persons and authorities may start certain matters in writing; the state supervisory authority also has power to start a municipal environmental rule matter if the municipality has not issued the rule.

Customs must provide official assistance for supervising compliance with this law and its rules; supervisory authorities must also help each other on request.

Tulli, Puolustusvoimat, and supervisory authorities must give official assistance in the situations described here.

Tulli and the Defence Forces must provide official assistance in the situations described, and supervisory authorities must assist each other on request.

Tulli, Puolustusvoimat ja valvontaviranomaiset on velvoitettu antamaan virka-apua tässä pykälässä kuvatuissa tilanteissa.

Valvontaviranomaisen must report certain acts or omissions to the police for pre-trial investigation, unless the matter is minor and the public interest does not require prosecution.

Viranomaisen on yleensä tehostettava tämän lain mukainen kielto tai määräys uhkasakolla tai uhalla, että työ teetetään tai toiminta keskeytetään, ellei se ole ilmeisen tarpeetonta.

The supervisory authority must report certain acts or omissions to the police for a preliminary investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not required in the public interest.

Tulli must provide official assistance when supervising compliance with this Act and its rules, and supervisory authorities must help each other on request to carry out tasks under the Act.

The supervisory authority must report certain acts or omissions under sections 224 and 225 to the police for pre-trial investigation, unless the matter is minor and the public interest does not require prosecution.

Customs must provide official assistance when monitoring compliance with this law and its rules, and supervisory authorities must assist each other on request to carry out their statutory tasks.

The supervisory authority must report acts or omissions covered by sections 224 and 225 to the police for a preliminary investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not required in the public interest.

A supervisory authority must report certain acts or omissions to the police for pre-trial investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not required in the public interest.

This section assigns supervision of permitted and registered activities to different environmental authorities and requires consultation if the supervising authority changes.

Before issuing an order covered by this chapter, the authority must give the affected person a chance to be heard. If needed, it must also hear other parties and certain supervisory/licensing/public-interest authorities.

This provision assigns supervision responsibilities between state and municipal environmental authorities, and allows registered-activity supervision to be combined with permit-based supervision in some cases.

The supervisory authority must report certain acts or omissions under sections 224 and 225 to the police for preliminary investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not required in the public interest.

This section assigns supervisory responsibility for permit-based, notification-based, and registrable activities between state and municipal environmental authorities.

The supervisory authority must report acts or omissions under sections 224 and 225 to the police for pretrial investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not required in the public interest.

This section allocates supervision responsibility for permit-based, notification-based, and registrable activities between state and municipal environmental authorities.

This provision allocates supervision of licensed, notifiable, and registrable activities between state and municipal environmental authorities, and requires consultation if the supervising authority changes.

This section says how to appeal certain authority decisions: many are appealed to the Vaasa Administrative Court, some to the Supreme Administrative Court, and some decisions cannot be appealed separately or at all.

Certain listed parties may start the matter in writing if it was not initiated by a supervisory authority.

This section sets out how decisions can be appealed and several limits on appeals.

The provision assigns supervision of permitted, notification-based, and registered activities between state and municipal environmental authorities, and requires hearings if the supervising authority changes.

The section sets out when appeals are allowed, where they go, and which decisions cannot be appealed.

This section assigns supervision responsibility for permit-, notification-, and register-based activities between state and municipal environmental authorities, and requires hearings if supervision is transferred.

The section says some decisions may be appealed, and the state supervisory authority may appeal a municipal environmental regulations decision.

This section sets out how to appeal certain decisions, including appeals to the Vaasa Administrative Court, and identifies some decisions that cannot be appealed.

The provision lists who has the right to appeal certain environmental permit decisions.

Tulli must provide official assistance when supervising compliance with this law and its rules. Supervisory authorities must also give each other assistance on request to carry out their statutory tasks.

Several listed parties have the right to appeal decisions in environmental matters.

This section assigns supervision responsibility for permit-based, notification-based, and registerable activities between state and municipal environmental authorities, and requires hearing when the supervising authority changes.

Useiden tahojen on sallittua valittaa ympäristöasioissa, kun laissa mainitut edellytykset täyttyvät.

This section sets out how certain decisions may be appealed and identifies some decisions that cannot be appealed, or cannot be appealed separately.

This section lists who has the right to appeal, including the parties, certain registered environmental groups, affected municipalities, supervisory authorities, Sámi Parliament, Skolt Village Meeting, and in some cases environmental authorities appealing further decisions.

Several listed parties have the right to appeal a decision, including the person concerned, certain registered environmental associations/foundations, affected municipalities, certain environmental authorities, the authority supervising the general public interest, Sámi Parliament, and the Skolt village meeting.

A rectification request may be sought within 30 days for certain decisions, and the request is handled by the permit authority.

A supervisory authority must report certain acts or omissions under sections 224 and 225 to the police for preliminary investigation, unless the matter is minor and prosecution is not needed in the public interest.

A decision under sections 64 and 65 may be rectified by the permit authority within 30 days of the decision.

This section sets out how appeals against certain authority decisions are made, and it also bars some decisions from being appealed separately.

Oikaisua saa hakea lupaviranomaiselta 30 päivän kuluessa tiedoksisaannista.

This section lists who may appeal and, for some authorities and organizations, the grounds for appeal.

A decision under sections 64 and 65 can be challenged by rectification within 30 days of notice; some joint-monitoring cost disputes and related fees follow the same procedure.

A correction request may be filed to the permitting authority within 30 days of receiving the decision, and related cost-allocation disputes can also be handled this way.

Certain decisions on fishery obligation implementation plans and fishery payment use plans may be challenged by requesting rectification from the permit authority.

This section allocates supervision of permit-based and registrable activities between the state supervisory authority and the municipal environmental protection authority.

The permit authority handles correction requests for certain fisheries-related decisions under the procedure set out in the Water Act.

This section lists who has the right to appeal.

A rectification request may be made to the permit authority concerning certain fisheries-related decisions.

A rectification request may be made to the permit authority against certain decisions within 30 days of notice, and the request can also cover a dispute about sharing joint-monitoring costs.

A rectification request may be made to the permit authority against certain fisheries-related decisions.

This section says a correction request may be made to the permit authority for certain fishery-related decisions.

An operator may request rectification of a permit-review decision from the state environmental permit authority, but cannot separately appeal the rectification decision.

This section sets out how to appeal certain decisions and which decisions cannot be appealed.

A business operator may request rectification of a permit-review decision, but cannot separately appeal the decision made on that rectification request.

A rectification request about certain monitoring plan and monitoring-order decisions must be made within 30 days of being notified of the decision.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may seek rectification from the state environmental permit authority concerning a permit-review decision, and there is no separate appeal against the rectification decision.

This section says that rectification may be sought from the permit authority for decisions concerning implementation plans for fisheries obligations and plans for using fisheries charges.

An operator may request rectification from the state environmental permit authority against a permit-review decision, but a decision on that rectification request cannot be separately appealed.

An operator may request rectification of a permit-review decision from the state environmental permit authority, but the rectification decision cannot be separately appealed.

This section sets out how certain decisions can be corrected or appealed, including appeals to the administrative court and, in some cases, to the Supreme Administrative Court with leave.

This section gives several parties the right to appeal certain decisions.

This section says which decisions can be appealed or corrected, and under what appeal rules.

Certain decisions about fishery obligation implementation plans and fishery fee use plans may be appealed by rectification request to the permit authority.

Tietyistä päätöksistä voi valittaa tai pyytää oikaisua hallintolaissa tai hallintotuomioistuimessa säädetyllä tavalla.

Toiminnanharjoittaja may request rectification from the state environmental permit authority concerning a state supervisory authority’s permit review decision; a rectification decision cannot be separately appealed.

A party may request rectification of certain inspection-body decisions, and a person subject to qualification assessment may request rectification of a certificate decision; rejected rectification decisions may be appealed to an administrative court.

This section lets affected parties seek correction or appeal certain decisions under the procedures set out in other laws.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden on kuulutettava erästä ympäristölupapäätöstä koskeva valitus, pidettävä valitusasiakirjat nähtävillä ja varattava tietyille asianosaisille sekä yleistä etua valvoville viranomaisille tilaisuus antaa vastine, ellei se ole ilmeisen tarpeetonta.

A rectification request may be made to the permit authority within 30 days of the decision.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden must notify the appeal by public notice, keep the appeal documents available, and give affected parties and public-interest authorities a chance to respond, unless those steps are manifestly unnecessary.

An operator may request correction of a permit-review decision from the state environmental permit authority, but a decision on that request cannot be separately appealed.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeus must notify and consult on an appeal concerning an environmental permit decision, unless that would be manifestly unnecessary.

Asianosainen voi vaatia oikaisua tietyistä päätöksistä ja hakea muutosta, jos oikaisuvaatimus hylätään.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeus must give notice of an environmental permit appeal, keep the notice and appeal documents on its website for at least 14 days, publish notice information in affected municipalities, and give concerned parties and public-interest authorities a chance to respond unless that is manifestly unnecessary.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeus must notify the appeal publicly, keep the appeal documents online for at least 14 days, publish notice in affected municipalities, and give certain parties and public-interest authorities a chance to respond unless that is evidently unnecessary.

The appeal court may conduct an on-site inspection, and it must arrange notice and delivery of certain environmental permit decisions and related information.

A request for rectification may be made to the permit authority for certain decisions about fishery obligation implementation plans and fishery fee use plans.

An appeal court may inspect a site, and the court must promptly notify, serve, and share certain decisions and decision changes with specified parties and authorities.

Asianosainen voi vaatia oikaisua tietyistä päätöksistä, ja hylättyyn oikaisuvaatimukseen sekä eräisiin muihin muutoksenhakutilanteisiin voi hakea muutosta lain mukaan.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden must give public notice of certain environmental permit decisions, keep the notice and decision available, publish the notice locally, and deliver the decision to specified parties and authorities.

Vaasan administrative court must give notice of certain appeals concerning environmental permit decisions, keep the notice and appeal documents online for at least 14 days, publish notice information in the municipalities in the affected area, and provide an opportunity to respond unless that is manifestly unnecessary.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeus must publicly notify certain environmental permit decisions, keep the notice and decision available for the appeal period, publish notice information locally, and send the decision or copies to specified parties and authorities. Appeal courts must also send electronic information on decision changes and finality to the permit and supervisory authority.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden on annettava tietyt ympäristölupapäätökset tiedoksi julkisella kuulutuksella, pidettävä kuulutus ja päätös nähtävillä, julkaistava tieto kuulutuksesta kuntien alueella ja toimitettava päätös sekä kopiot useille asianosaisille ja viranomaisille.

Luvanvaraista toimintaa ei saa aloittaa tai muuttaa ennen kuin sitä koskeva lupapäätös on lainvoimainen.

The operator may request correction of a permit-review decision from the state environmental permit authority, but there is no separate appeal against the decision made on that request.

Licensed activity may not start or change until the permit decision is final; a compensation appeal does not stop the activity from starting.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden must notify an environmental permit appeal by public notice and provide consultation steps.

Permit-required activity may not start or be changed before the permit decision is final; an appeal about compensation does not stop the activity from starting.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeus must give notice of certain environmental permit decisions by public notice, keep the notice and decision available, publish notice information in affected municipalities, and send the decision to specified parties and authorities. Appeal-court decisions in enforcement matters must be served by certified service, and the appeal court must also send electronic information on changes and finality to the permit and supervisory authority.

A licensed activity may not be started or changed before the decision authorizing it has become final.

Luvanvaraista toimintaa ei saa aloittaa tai muuttaa ennen lainvoimaista lupapäätöstä; korvausta koskeva valitus ei estä toiminnan aloittamista.

The permit authority may allow an activity to start before an appeal is resolved, if the legal conditions are met and the applicant gives acceptable security in some cases.

This section lets affected persons seek correction or appeal in several competence-assessment and certification cases.

Lupaviranomainen voi hakemuksesta antaa luvan aloittaa toiminnan ennen muutoksenhaun päättymistä, jos edellytykset täyttyvät ja hyväksyttävä vakuus asetetaan.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden must notify environmental permit decisions by public notice, keep the notice and decision available, publish notice information in the affected municipalities, and send the decision to specified parties and authorities.

Lupaviranomainen voi tietyin edellytyksin sallia toiminnan aloittamisen muutoksenhausta huolimatta, jos hakija antaa hyväksyttävän vakuuden ennen aloittamista.

Luvanvaraista toimintaa ei saa aloittaa tai muuttaa ennen kuin lupapäätös on lainvoimainen. Korvausta koskeva valitus ei estä toiminnan aloittamista.

Lupaviranomainen voi tietyin edellytyksin sallia toiminnan aloittamisen muutoksenhausta huolimatta, jos hakija asettaa hyväksyttävän vakuuden ennen aloittamista.

The permit authority may let activities begin even though an appeal is pending, if the applicant asks for it, there is a justified reason, the appeal is not made useless, and acceptable security is provided.

Päätöksen tehnyt viranomainen voi määrätä, että tietyt määräykset tai päätökset on noudatettava, vaikka niihin haettaisiin muutosta.

Vaasan hallinto-oikeuden must notify about an appeal by public notice, keep the appeal documents available, and give certain parties a chance to respond unless that is evidently unnecessary.

The authority that made the decision may order that certain listed decisions or orders must be followed even if an appeal is filed.

Licensed activity may not start or be changed until the permit decision that authorizes it is final; an appeal about compensation does not stop the activity from starting.

The decision-making authority may order certain decisions or orders to be followed even if a rectification request or appeal has been made.

The permit authority may allow the activity to start despite an appeal if conditions are met, and the applicant provides an acceptable security before starting.

The decision-making authority may order certain specified decisions or orders to be followed even if someone requests rectification or appeals.

The authority that made the decision may order that certain decisions or orders must be complied with even if reconsideration or an appeal has been filed.

This section lets appeal courts change, cancel, or suspend enforcement of certain permit-related decisions, and gives an appellant in an environmental permit case a way to ask the administrative court to change or cancel a related decision without a separate appeal.

The administrative court must promptly publish and distribute certain environmental permit decisions, and the appeal court may conduct an on-site inspection.

The appeal court may cancel, change, or stop enforcement of certain permit-related orders; in some cases the Vaasa Administrative Court may require the decision to be followed despite an appeal.

Lupaviranomainen may allow activity to start despite appeal if the applicant requests it, gives an acceptable security, and the legal conditions are met.

Appeal courts may annul, change, or block enforcement of certain permit-related orders; in some cases the Vaasa Administrative Court may order a decision to be followed despite an appeal.

The decision-making authority may order that certain listed decisions or orders must be complied with even if a rectification request or appeal is pending.

On appeal, the court may cancel or change certain orders or stop enforcement of a permit decision; in some cases, an appellant may ask for a related decision to be cancelled or changed without filing a separate appeal.

Appeal courts may annul or change certain orders and may prohibit a permit decision from being enforced.