Règlement ministériel du 12 février 1982 réglementant le détail concernant le déroulement des examens pour le diplôme d'Etat d'infirmier ou d'infirmier psychiatrique. | http://data.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rmin/1982/02/12/n1/jo — Luxembourg law | Esheria

Règlement ministériel du 12 février 1982 réglementant le détail concernant le déroulement des examens pour le diplôme d'Etat d'infirmier ou d'infirmier psychiatrique.

This preamble identifies a ministerial order about how exams for the state nursing diploma and the psychiatric nursing diploma are to be conducted.

AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.

Jurisdiction
Luxembourg
Instrument
Regulation
Citation
http://data.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rmin/1982/02/12/n1/jo
Status
In force
Version
Undated source snapshot
Language
fr
Updated
Official source
View official record ↗
assessment conduct assessment process education education administration exam administration exam marking examination organization examinations nursing practical assessment professional examination question selection

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct access and API use, but this release emits noindex,follow for the following reason:

  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)

Statute overview

About this statute

This preamble identifies a ministerial order about how exams for the state nursing diploma and the psychiatric nursing diploma are to be conducted. The exam for the state diploma of nurse or psychiatric nurse must follow the rules set out here, subject to two earlier grand-ducal regulations. The government commissioner must call the exam commission to a preliminary meeting, and the commission must set the exam dates and related deadlines. This article sets the process for selecting written exam questions and keeping them secret until opening time. Written exams must be anonymous, candidates may not use other paper or communicate, and fraud can trigger immediate interruption, a failing mark, or rejection depending on the case.