THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION (EXAMINATIONS) (AMENDMENTS) RULES, 2024

This section gives the short title of the Rules and says they are to be read together with the 2023 principal Rules.

AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.

Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Instrument: Rule
Citation: THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION (EXAMINATIONS) (AMENDMENTS) RULES, 2024
Version: Undated source snapshot
Language: en
Official source: View official record ↗

academic grievance process amendments appeals and review appeals procedure definitions education ex parte decisions examinations hearing procedure rule amendment student attendance student grievance procedure

Statute overview

About this statute

This section gives the short title of the Rules and says they are to be read together with the 2023 principal Rules. The principal Rules are amended by replacing three word references: “NACTVET,” “NTA,” and “TCU,” with longer named terms. Rule 3 is amended so that “abscondment” is redefined. A student who disputes continuous assessment must first report it in writing to the module instructor within 5 days, then to the Head of Department within 5 days if needed, and finally to DR-ARC within 5 days for a final decision. A student who is aggrieved about research, field work, a project, or a dissertation must report the matter in writing within five days, first to the supervisor, then to the Head of Department, and then to the DR-ARC if earlier steps are not resolved.

Read the provisions Ask with citations

Search within this statute

Search all stored provisions in this version.

Legal text

Provisions of THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION (EXAMINATIONS) (AMENDMENTS) RULES, 2024

Showing 8 of 8

1
These Rules may be cited as the College of
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: This section gives the short title of the Rules and says they are to be read together with the 2023 principal Rules.

1. These Rules may be cited as the College of Business Education (Examinations) (Amendments) Rules, 2024 and shall be read as one with the College of Business Education (Examinations) Rules, 2023, hereinafter referred to as the principal Rules.
2
The principal Rules are amended generally by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: The principal Rules are amended by replacing three word references: “NACTVET,” “NTA,” and “TCU,” with longer named terms.

2. The principal Rules are amended generally by- (a) deleting the word “NACTVET” wherever it the words appears and substituting “National Council for Technical and Vocational Education Training”; for it (b) deleting the word “NTA” wherever it appears and substituting for it the words “National Technical Award”; and (c) deleting the word “TCU” wherever it appears and “Tanzania the words for substituting Commission for Universities.”. it Amendmen t of rule 3
3
The principal Rules are amended in rule 3 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: Rule 3 is amended so that “abscondment” is redefined.

3. The principal Rules are amended in rule 3 by deleting the definition of the term “abscondment” and substituting for it the following: “abscondment” means not sitting for scheduled attend or examination, scheduled classes to the required percentage or failure to postpone studies without reasonable cause supported by sufficient evidence. failure to 1 The College of Business Education (Examinations) (Amendments) Rules GN. No. 870 (Contd) Amendmen t of rule 14

Part

scheduled classes to the required

4
The Principal Rules are amended in rule 14 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: A student who disputes continuous assessment must first report it in writing to the module instructor within 5 days, then to the Head of Department within 5 days if needed, and finally to DR-ARC within 5 days for a final decision.

4. The Principal Rules are amended in rule 14 by adding immediately after sub rule (12) the following: “(13) A student who is aggrieved by the conduct or assessment of continuous assessment in the module- (a) shall within five days report the matter in writing to the respective module instructor for timely resolution; (b) where the student is aggrieved by the decision of the module instructor or the module instructor fails to resolve the matter within seven days from the date of reporting the student shall within five days report the matter in writing to the respective Head of Department; the matter, (c) where the student is aggrieved by the decision of the Head of Department or to the Head of Department fails resolve the matter within seven days from the date of reporting the matter, the student shall within five days report the matter in writing to the DR- ARC for final decision.”. Amendmen t of rule 18
5
The Principal Rules are amended in rule 18 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: A student who is aggrieved about research, field work, a project, or a dissertation must report the matter in writing within five days, first to the supervisor, then to the Head of Department, and then to the DR-ARC if earlier steps are not resolved.

5. The Principal Rules are amended in rule 18 by adding immediately after sub rule (8) the following: “(9) A student aggrieved by the conduct research or field work, project, of the dissertation- (a) shall within five days report the matter in writing to the respective supervisor for timely resolution; (b) where the student is aggrieved by the decision of the supervisor or the supervisor fails to resolve the matter within seven days from the date of reporting the matter, the student shall within five days report the matter in writing to the respective Head of Department; 2 The College of Business Education (Examinations) (Amendments) Rules GN. No. 870 (Contd) (c) where the student is aggrieved by the decision of the Head of Department or the Head of Department fails to resolve the matter within seven days from the date of reporting the matter, the student shall within five days report the matter in writing to the DR- ARC for final decision.”. Amendmen t of rule 30
6
The Principal Rules are amended in rule 30 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: A candidate may apply in writing within five days of an ex parte decision to have it set aside if there was sufficient cause for the non-appearance; the Committee must then, if satisfied, set the decision aside and schedule a hearing.

6. The Principal Rules are amended in rule 30 by adding immediately after sub rule (19) the following: “(20) Notwithstanding the provisions of sub rule (18), the candidate may within five days from the date of an ex parte decision apply in writing to set aside the decision thereof, upon satisfying Irregularities Handling Committee that there was sufficient cause for such non-appearance. Examination the (21) The Examination Irregularities Handling Committee shall, upon being satisfied with the application made under sub rule (20), make an order setting aside the decision and appoint a day for hearing the matter.”. Amendmen t of rule 32 Amendmen t of rule 45
7
The Principal Rules are amended in rule 32 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: This section amends rule 32 by deleting sub rule (6).

7. The Principal Rules are amended in rule 32 by deleting sub rule (6).
8
The Principal Rules are amended in rule 45 by
Verify source ↗

AI-assisted research summary: Rule 45 is amended to change the appeal process, require appeals to be filed through the Students’ Information System unless the DR-ARC directs otherwise, and require the Examination Results Appeal Committee to decide appeals within 21 days after the appeal period ends.

8. The Principal Rules are amended in rule 45 by- (a) deleting sub rule (1); 3 The College of Business Education (Examinations) (Amendments) Rules GN. No. 870 (Contd) (b) renumbering sub rules (2), (3), (4) and (6) as sub rule (1), (2), (3) and (4) respectively; rule (c) deleting sub (4) as renumbered and substituting for it the following: “(4) Unless directed otherwise by the DR-ARC, an appeal shall be filed to the examination office through Students’ Information System upon payment of the applicable fee”. (d) adding immediately after sub rule (4) as renumbered the following: “(5) The Examination Results Appeal Committee shall determine the appeal within twenty-one days after expiry of the appeal period; and (6) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to matters provided under rule 14 and 18.”. Dar es Salaam, 10th October, 2024 WINEASTER S. ANDERSON Chairperson of the Governing Board 4

Provision text is displayed from LexChat’s stored statute record. Use the official source links to verify amendments, commencement, and current legal force.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the legislation currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

AI-generated material is explicitly labelled and published only through LexChat's quality controls. It is a research aid, not the source document.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION (EXAMINATIONS) (AMENDMENTS) RULES, 2024

About this statute

Search within this statute

Provisions of THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION (EXAMINATIONS) (AMENDMENTS) RULES, 2024

scheduled classes to the required

Ask AI about this statute

Sign in to ask AI about this statute