軍人權益事件處理法

This law is enacted to handle disputes involving military personnel’s rights in a prompt and coordinated way, while protecting those rights, maintaining unit discipline, and strengthening combat capability.

權保會審議復審及再申訴事件時，須依指定委員組成合議決定，且委員任一性別比例不得少於五分之二；決定時須全數出席並經出席委員過半數同意，相關規則由國防部訂定。

權保委員或書記官在有利害關係或曾參與相關程序等情形時，應自行迴避；當事人也可以向權保會申請迴避。

權保會的決定一旦確定，對該事件會拘束相關機關、部隊、學校或行政法人。

軍人就特定行政處分或機關不作為、駁回申請的情形，除法律另有規定外，可以依本法提起復審。

非軍人若其原軍人身分相關請求權受侵害，可依前條規定提起復審；軍人死亡時，其遺族對因該軍人身分所生的公法上財產請求權受侵害者，亦可比照辦理。

復審通常要在行政處分送達後30日內提出；若送達時艦艇正在航行，期間改自返抵國內港口次日起算。

提起復審時，復審人要提出復審書，載明法定事項，並附原行政處分書影本；復審書通常要由復審人及法定代理人簽名或蓋章，委任代理人時則由代理人簽名或蓋章。

This article says which agency counts as the original authority for an administrative disposition, including cases where a superior agency issues the disposition but a subordinate agency executes it, or where the original agency is reorganized or abolished.

復審人要先經由原處分機關向權保會提出復審；原處分機關須先重新審查，認為有理由時可自行撤銷或變更原處分，並通知權保會。

If the original agency does not act within the prior period, the review authority may notify it to submit the case file materials within 15 days, and may decide the matter directly if it does not comply.

This provision says disputes between military personnel and their responsible agencies, units, schools, administrative corporations, or personnel authorities about status, public-law property claims, discipline, performance reviews, and other administrative dispositions or management measures are governed by this Act unless another law says otherwise.

A reconsideration statement made to the original agency or the rights protection committee within the Article 15(1) period counts as timely filed. The rights protection committee must notify correction, and a receiving agency must transfer the case to the competent committee within 10 days and notify the reconsideration applicant.

復審人可以在復審決定書送達前撤回復審；一旦撤回，就不能再提起同一復審。

復審人死亡時，符合條件的繼承人或權利承受人可以承受復審程序；承受者要在事實發生後30日內向權保會提出證明文件。

If a review petition is not in the required form but can be corrected, the authority must notify the reviewer to fix it within 20 days.

A person who can independently bear obligations by a legal act has review capacity; a person without review capacity must act through a legal representative.

兩人以上可以就同一原因事實的行政處分共同提起復審，並可選任1至3名代表人；未選任時，權保會可通知限期選任，逾期仍未選任的，權保會可依職權指定。

選定或指定的代表人可代表全體復審人進行復審；若有兩名以上代表人， प्रत्येक人都可單獨代表共同復審人。撤回復審須經全體復審人書面同意。

復審人可以委任代理人，但每人最多三名；首次代理時要向權保會提出委任書，變更或解除也要書面通知，否則不生效力。

復審代理人可在受委任事項內進行各種復審行為；但撤回復審，除非另有特別委任，不得為之。

復審人或復審代理人經權保會許可後，可以在期日帶輔佐人到場；權保會認為必要時，也可以命其帶輔佐人到場。

軍人權益救濟依本法規定的復審、申訴、再申訴和行政訴訟程序進行。

復審人因不可歸責事由遲誤復審期間時，可在原因消滅後10日內以書面向權保會申請回復原狀；但若已逾1年，不得申請。

If the original disposition authority gives the wrong appeal-review period, it must correct it by notice; the period then runs from the day after that notice is served. If the authority failed to give the period or failed to correct an error, a person who files review within one year after service of the disposition is treated as having filed in time.

When calculating the statutory period, the time in transit must be deducted in the listed review cases. The Ministry of National Defense prescribes the method for making that deduction.

Period calculation follows the Administrative Procedure Act unless another law provides otherwise.

權保會要把復審事件文書編成卷宗並依法保存；復審人或其代理人可申請閱覽、抄錄、影印、攝錄或取得相關副本，除特定保密情形外不得拒絕。

復審文書送達先以郵務送達；不成時可改由權保會派員或囑託機關送達；再不成時可寄存送達，並在寄存十日後生效。

復審文書的送達，除前條另有規定外，依行政程序法相關規定辦理。

復審原則上以書面審查決定；必要時，權保會可通知復審人或相關人員到指定處所陳述意見並接受詢問。

權保會在必要時，可以依職權或依復審人申請，通知相關人員到指定地點在指定日期進行言詞辯論。

This provision sets the order for oral argument and lets a senior full-time committee member preside.

權責機關不得歧視或不公平對待依本法提起復審、申訴、再申訴或行政訴訟的人。

權保會審議復審事件時，應指定書記官製作審議紀錄附卷；委員對不同意見如請求，應列入紀錄。

復審人可以提出證據書類、證物或其他證據方法；若屬限期提出者，應在該期間內提出。

權保會可以命文書或其他物件的持有人提出物件，並可以留置；對公務員或機關掌管的文書或物件，也可以調閱。

權保會可以進行檢驗、勘驗或鑑定，並指定鑑定人；勘驗時要通知復審人到場，且不得在未給其表示意見機會前，把結果用作對其不利的復審決定依據。

鑑定人原則上要以鑑定書陳述意見；必要時，權保會可要求到指定處所說明。

復審人若不服權保會在復審程序中的程序處理，應連同復審決定一起提起行政訴訟。

This provision says a review case must be dismissed as inadmissible if one of the listed reasons applies, but if a case was wrongly filed as a review when it should be a complaint, the review body must transfer it and notify the person instead of immediately dismissing it.

The authority must dismiss a review if it has no grounds, and may treat a review as groundless in certain cases or note that an original decision is illegal or improper in its reasons.

若依第十三條第一項提起的復審有理由，權保會應決定撤銷原行政處分全部或一部。

復審有理由時，權保會要指定期間，命權責機關盡速作成行政處分；若是針對駁回處分，權保會也要撤銷全部或一部，並發回原處分機關另作處分。

申訴管轄機關、權保會及勤務法庭，不得在當事人不服的範圍內作出更不利的變更或處分。

權保會在特定情況下可以駁回復審；如果這樣做，決定主文要寫明原行政處分違法或顯然不當。

權保會在作成前條決定時，可以斟酌復審人因違法或顯然不當行政處分所受損害，並在決定理由中載明由原處分機關與復審人進行賠償協議。

復審決定的作成期限通常是權保會收到原處分機關答辯後三個月內；在補正、續補理由或延長情況下，期間會依規定重新起算或延長。

復審人死亡時，復審程序在繼受人承受前會停止；在相關法律關係仍在訴訟或其他救濟中且未確定前，權保會可以停止復審並通知復審人；程序停下後，前條的復審決定期間會重新起算。

復審決定書應記載指定事項，正本並應在決定後15日內送達復審人及原處分機關。

復審人可在法定期限內向勤務法庭提起行政訴訟；部分案件適用簡易程序，其餘適用通常程序。

復審決定書要附記不服決定時的行政訴訟期間；如果期間附記錯誤，權保會要通知更正。

軍人可就特定行政處分或管理措施向申訴管轄機關提起申訴；對列舉的幾類處分不服時，則應依規定提出申訴。

An appeal must be filed within 30 days after service, with a special start date if service happens while a ship is at sea. If the original decision was not made in writing, the person affected can ask for a written version, and the original agency must not refuse; if the person objects on the spot and states reasons, the agency must record and hand over those reasons.

申訴管轄機關要在收到申訴後30日內處理；必要時可延長10日並通知申訴人。逾期未處理時，申訴人可直接再申訴。

原行政處分或原管理措施在本法程序進行期間不停止執行；但在特定條件下，相關機關得於訴訟前依職權或依申請，停止其全部或一部執行。

If a complaint falls within any of the listed situations, the complaint-handling authority may decline to process it.

If a matter that should have been filed for reconsideration is mistakenly filed as a complaint, the complaint authority must send it to the original disposition authority for processing under reconsideration procedure and notify the person who filed it incorrectly.

不服申訴處理的人，可以向權保會提起再申訴。

提出再申訴時，應提交再申訴書，並載明法定事項；再申訴書還必須由再申訴人及法定代理人簽名或蓋章，若委任再申訴代理人，則由代理人簽名或蓋章。

A reconsideration decision should be made within three months after receiving the reconsideration petition.

相關機關收到權保會就再申訴事件的函詢時，應在20日內回復並附上事實、理由、處理意見及相關資料。

If a retrial appeal is well-founded and the sanction has already been carried out, the Rights Protection Committee must issue a decision confirming the disposition was unlawful.

If a matter that should be brought by reconsideration or complaint is mistakenly filed as a re-complaint with the Rights Protection Committee, the Committee must notify the original disposition agency or the competent complaint authority to handle it under the proper procedure, and also notify the person who filed it.

再申訴，除本節另有規定外，適用本法關於復審的規定。

再申訴人可以在法定期限內，向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地的勤務法庭提起行政訴訟；特殊情況下，期限起算點不同。

在停止執行的原因消失或其他情況變更時，相關機關可以依職權或依申請撤銷停止執行。

不服權保會的復審或再申訴決定，原則上由勤務法庭管轄；勤務法庭審理時，除本法另有規定外，準用行政訴訟法，並應妥速審理。其細則由國防部定之。

勤務法庭原則上由三名軍事審判官合議審理；簡易訴訟程序則可由一名軍事審判官獨任審理。

當軍事審判官迴避或因其他原因造成合議庭員額不足時，可以由地方軍事法院調充。

Administrative litigation cases accepted by the court are exempt from court fees, except where fees are collected under Article 98-6(1)(1) of the Administrative Litigation Act.

A judgment of the service court may be appealed or subject to interlocutory appeal to the high administrative court where the service court is located, under the relevant administrative litigation rules.

在戰時、戒嚴或動員實施階段，如有必要，這部法律可以全部或部分暫停適用；暫停的範圍或地區由國防部以命令決定。

不具軍人身分、且屬軍事養成教育學生，在基礎教育期間，就權責機關的行政處分或管理措施提出救濟時，適用本法規定。

Pending relief cases started before this law took effect must be finished under this law’s procedure, except administrative-court cases that follow the original procedure; acts already done under statutory procedure keep their effect.

本法的施行日期由行政院 तय定。

地方軍事法院 must set up a committee of full-time and part-time rights-protection members and use it to review reconsideration and appeal cases. The Ministry of National Defense may set the rules for part-time members’ qualifications, appointment, dismissal, and related matters.

復審及再申訴事件由所在地的權保會管轄；若無管轄權，權保會應依職權移送有管轄權的權保會並通知當事人。

Chapter 1: General Provisions.

This chapter concerns review.

This section concerns initiating a review appeal.

Section heading: “Reviewers.”

This chapter concerns dates and periods.

This section heading concerns review case files and service of documents.

This chapter heading is “Review hearing.”

This provision is a section heading for “Reconsideration Decision.”

本章標題為「申訴及再申訴」。

This is a section heading for complaint procedures and handling.

本節標題為「再申訴程序及處理」。

This chapter is titled “High Military Court Service Court.”

Chapter 6: Supplementary Provisions.

This chapter is titled “地方軍事法院官兵權益保障會”.