ARS § 48-3645

48-3645 - Licensing time frames; compliance; consequence for failure to comply with time frame; exemptions; definitions 48-3645. Licensing time frames; compliance; consequence for failure to comply with time frame; exemptions; definitions A. For any new ordinance or regulation requiring a license, a district shall have in place an overall time frame during which the district will either grant or deny each type of license that it issues. The overall time frame for each type of license shall state separately the administrative completeness review time frame and the substantive review time frame and shall be posted on the district's website, if the district maintains a website. B. On or before December 31, 2012, a district that issues licenses required under existing ordinances or codes shall have in place an overall time frame during which the district will either grant or deny each type of license that it issues. The overall time frame for each type of license shall state separately the administrative completeness review time frame and the substantive review time frame and shall be posted on the district's website, if the district maintains a website. Districts shall prioritize the establishment of time frames for those licenses that have the greatest impact on the public. C. In establishing time frames, districts shall consider all of the following: 1. The complexity of the licensing subject matter. 2. The resources of the district. 3. The economic impact of delay on the regulated community. 4. The impact of the licensing decision on public health and safety. 5. The possible use of volunteers with expertise in the subject matter area. 6. The possible increased use of general licenses for similar types of licensed businesses or facilities. 7. The possible increased cooperation between the district and the regulated community. 8. Increased district flexibility in structuring the licensing process and personnel including: (a) Master planned communities. (b) Suspension of the substantive and overall time frames for purposes including delays caused by the need for public hearings, state or federal approvals or approvals from public utilities on residential or commercial development projects. 9. That the substantive review and overall time frames do not include the time required by the applicant to obtain other nondistrict licenses or to participate in meetings as required by law. D. A district shall issue a written or electronic notice of administrative completeness or deficiencies to an applicant for a license within the administrative completeness review time frame. If the permit sought requires approval of more than one department of the district, each department may issue a written or electronic notice of administrative completeness or deficiencies. E. If a district determines that an application for a license is not administratively complete, the district shall include a comprehensive list of the specific deficiencies in the written or electronic notice provided pursuant to subsection D of this section. If the district issues a written or electronic notice of deficiencies within the administrative completeness time frame, the administrative completeness review time frame and the overall time frame are suspended from the date the notice is issued until the date that the district receives the missing information from the applicant. The district may issue an additional written or electronic notice of administrative completeness or deficiencies based on the applicant's submission of missing information. If the permit sought requires approval of more than one department of the district, each department may issue an additional written or electronic notice of administrative completeness or deficiencies based on the applicant's submission of missing information. F. If a district does not issue a written or electronic notice of administrative completeness or deficiencies within the administrative completeness review time frame, the application is deemed administratively complete. If a district issues a timely written or electronic notice of deficiencies, an application shall not be complete until all requested information has been received by the district. A district may consider an application withdrawn if by fifteen days or longer after the date of the notice, as established by the district, the applicant does not supply the documentation or information requested or an explanation of why the information cannot be provided within the established time period. G. During the substantive review time frame, a district may make one comprehensive written or electronic request for corrections. If the district identifies legal requirements that were not included in the comprehensive request for corrections, the district may amend the comprehensive request for corrections once to include the legal requirements and the legal authority for the requirements. If the permit sought requires approval of more than one department of the district, each department may issue a comprehensive written or electronic request for corrections. If the applicant fails to resolve an issue identified in a request for corrections, the district may make supplemental written or electronic requests for corrections that are limited to issues previously identified in a comprehensive request for corrections. If a district issues a comprehensive written or electronic request or a supplemental request for corrections, the substantive review time frame and the overall time frame are suspended from the date the request is issued until the date that the district receives the corrections from the applicant. If an applicant requests significant changes, alterations, additions or amendments to an application that are consistent with the purposes of the original application and that are not in response to a request for correction, a district may make one additional comprehensive written or electronic request for corrections and may have no more than an additional fifty per cent of the substantive review time frame as established by the district for that license to grant or deny the license. Nothing shall prevent communication between a district and an applicant regarding a comprehensive written or electronic request for corrections or a supplemental request for corrections. A district may consider an application withdrawn if, by thirty days or more after the date of notice, as established by the district, the applicant does not supply the documentation or information requested or an explanation of why the information cannot be provided within the established time period. H. Nothing shall prevent the district from continuing to process the application during the suspension of the substantive review time frame and overall time frame. I. By mutual written or electronic agreement, a district and an applicant for a license may extend the substantive review time frame and the overall time frame. An extension of the substantive review time frame and the overall time frame may not exceed fifty per cent of the overall time frame. J. Unless a district and an applicant for a license mutually agree to extend the substantive review time frame and the overall time frame pursuant to subsection I of this section, a district shall issue a written or electronic notice granting or denying a license to an applicant. If a district denies or withdraws an application for a license, the district shall include in the written or electronic notice at least the following information: 1. Justification for the denial or withdrawal with references to the statutes, ordinances, executive orders, substantive policy statements or delegation agreements on which the denial or withdrawal is based. 2. An explanation of the applicant's right to appeal the denial or withdrawal. The explanation shall include the number of working days in which the applicant must file a protest challenging the denial or withdrawal and the name and telephone number of a district contact person who can answer questions regarding the appeals process. 3. An explanation of the applicant's right to resubmit the application, the total amount of fees that will be assessed if the applicant resubmits the application and the method in which the fees were calculated. K. If a district does not issue to the applicant the written or electronic notice granting or denying a license within the overall time frame or within the mutually agreed upon time frame extension, the district shall refund to the applicant all fees charged for reviewing and acting on the application for the license and shall excuse payment of any fees that have not yet been paid. The district shall not require an applicant to submit an application for a refund pursuant to this subsection. The refund shall be made within thirty working days after the expiration of the overall time frame or the time frame extension. The district shall continue to process the application. Notwithstanding any other statute, the district shall make the refund from the fund in which the application fees were originally deposited. The right to receive a refund of fees charged for reviewing and acting on the application for the license may not be waived by the applicant. L. If an application for a license is denied because revisions or corrections were not submitted or considered within the allowed time frame, or withdrawn, and the applicant resubmits the application for the same purposes with only revisions or corrections to the original application, the district shall not assess any additional fees that exceed fifty per cent of the original permit fee that has not been refunded to the applicant provided that the application is submitted before the time of destruction of the original application file pursuant to section 41-151.15. This subsection does not apply to license applications that were denied for disqualifying criminal convictions or that were submitted fraudulently. M. This section does not apply to a license that is either: 1. Issued within seven working days after receipt of the initial application or a permit that expires within twenty-one working days after issuance. 2. Necessary for the construction or development of a residential lot, including swimming pools, hardscape and property walls, subdivisions or master planned community. N. For the purposes of this section: 1. "Master planned community" means development by one or more developers of real estate that consists of residential, commercial, education, health care, open space and recreational components and that is developed pursuant to a long-range, multiphase master plan providing comprehensive land use planning and staged implementation and development. 2. "Subdivision" means improved or unimproved land or lands divided for the purposes of financing, sale or lease, whether immediate or future, into four or more lots, tracts or parcels of land, or, if a new street is involved, any such property that is divided into two or more lots, tracts or parcels of land, or, any such property, the boundaries of which have been fixed by a recorded plat, which is divided into more than two parts. Subdivision includes any condominium, cooperative, community apartment, townhouse or similar project containing four or more parcels, in which an undivided interest in the land is coupled with the right of exclusive occupancy of any unit located thereon, but plats of such projects need not show the buildings or the manner in which the buildings or airspace above the property shown on the plat are to be divided.