United States — Louisiana Act or statute

United States — Louisiana legislation

RS 10:4A-203

A receiving bank may limit enforcement or retention of payment by express agreement, and it cannot enforce or retain payment if the customer proves the order was not caused by certain entrusted or unauthorized persons.

bankingpayment orders

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct research for the following reasons:

  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)
  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (emergency-noindex)

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“A receiving bank may limit enforcement or retention of payment by express agreement, and it cannot enforce or retain payment if the customer proves the order was not caused by certain entrusted or unauthorized persons.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Undated source snapshot. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

RS 10:4A-203

A receiving bank may limit enforcement or retention of payment by express agreement, and it cannot enforce or retain payment if the customer proves the order was not caused by certain entrusted or unauthorized persons.

Section 10:4A-203

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legis.la.gov · Undated source snapshot

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Provision
§ 10:4A-203RS 10:4A-203Provision

A receiving bank may limit enforcement or retention of payment by express agreement, and it cannot enforce or retain payment if the customer proves the order was not caused by certain entrusted or unauthorized persons.

§4A-203. Unenforceability of certain verified payment orders (a) If an accepted payment order is not, under R.S. 10:4A-202(a), an authorized order of a customer identified as sender, but is effective as an order of the customer pursuant to R.S. 10:4A-202(b), the following rules apply: (1) By express agreement evidenced by a record, the receiving bank may limit the extent to which it is entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order. (2) The receiving bank is not entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order if the customer proves that the order was not caused, directly or indirectly, by a person (i) entrusted at any time with duties to act for the customer with respect to payment orders or the security procedure, or (ii) who obtained access to transmitting facilities of the customer or who obtained, from a source controlled by the customer and without authority of the receiving bank, information facilitating breach of the security procedure, regardless of how the information was obtained or whether the customer was at fault. Information includes any access device, computer software, or the like. (b) This Section applies to amendments of payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment orders. Added by Acts 1990, No. 1079, §4, eff. Sept. 1, 1990; Acts 2024, No. 773, §1.
Section 10:4A-203Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • Undated version · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.