The division of administration and statewide elected officials must set up uniform policies for handling complaints about unreasonable competition by state agencies, with specified exceptions and approval steps.
PART XV. POLICY FOR HANDLING COMPLAINTS; UNREASONABLE COMPETITION BY STATE AGENCIES §367. Policy formulation A.(1) The division of administration shall establish a uniform policy for adoption and implementation by all state agencies, except for those agencies under the control of a statewide elected official, for handling claims of unreasonable competition. (2) Each statewide elected official shall establish a uniform policy for adoption and implementation by all agencies under his control for handling claims of unreasonable competition. B. The policy shall include guidelines by which state agencies can address complaints when lodged by a businessman operating a privately owned business located in the state who has cause to believe that an activity engaged in by a state agency provides unreasonable competition with his business. However, no business which was established for the purpose of providing services or goods required by the state shall be eligible to file complaints under the provisions of this Part, nor shall any business which was established through a state economic development assistance program be eligible to file complaints under the provisions of this Part. C. The policy shall acknowledge that, while state agencies have a mandated responsibility to perform those services required by law, the state shall not unduly interfere with the private sector. D. In developing the policy and guidelines, the following should be considered or included: (1) Providing that a complaint may be lodged at the level of state government most closely associated with the alleged unreasonable competition. (2) Establishing a procedure which will channel complaints to the head of the agency, the elected official, or the secretary of the department together with all documentation establishing the alleged unreasonable competition and requiring that the secretary, the elected official, or the head of that agency promptly contact the complainant and attempt to rectify the matter to the mutual satisfaction of the agency and the complainant either by private or public hearings. (3) Providing a mechanism by which the division of administration shall review all complaints made to agencies to which its policy is applicable which are unresolved at the agency level in order to provide statewide uniformity in handling such complaints. (4) Considering the establishment of a board of review to serve as the final arbitrator in cases which an agency has been unable to effectively resolve. E. Upon adoption and prior to promulgation of the policy providing for a uniform procedure for addressing complaints of unreasonable competition arising from state activities, the division of administration and statewide elected officials shall present the policies for approval to both a joint committee of the Senate and House Committees on Commerce and the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget. F. The policy established by the division of administration shall not apply to colleges or universities which have rules in place on or before January 1, 1991 which address the handling of claims of unreasonable competition. Such rules shall be presented for approval to both a joint committee of the Senate and House Committees on Commerce and the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget. G. The policy established by the division of administration shall not apply to programs currently in operation or under construction by the Prison Enterprise Division of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections. Acts 1990, No. 982, §1.