United States — Louisiana Act or statute

United States — Louisiana legislation

RS 10:9-330

A buyer of chattel paper or an instrument can get priority over competing security interests if specific good-faith, value, and possession/control conditions are met.

chattel paperinstrumentsprioritysecurity interests

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct research for the following reasons:

  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)
  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (emergency-noindex)

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“A buyer of chattel paper or an instrument can get priority over competing security interests if specific good-faith, value, and possession/control conditions are met.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Undated source snapshot. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

RS 10:9-330

A buyer of chattel paper or an instrument can get priority over competing security interests if specific good-faith, value, and possession/control conditions are met.

Section 10:9-330

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legis.la.gov · Undated source snapshot

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Provision
§ 10:9-330RS 10:9-330Provision

A buyer of chattel paper or an instrument can get priority over competing security interests if specific good-faith, value, and possession/control conditions are met.

§9-330. Priority of purchaser of chattel paper or instrument (a) Purchaser's priority: security interest claimed merely as proceeds. A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if: (1) in good faith and in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, the purchaser gives new value, takes possession of each authoritative tangible copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper, and obtains control under R.S. 10:9-105 of each authoritative electronic copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper; and (2) the authoritative copies of the record evidencing the chattel paper do not indicate that the chattel paper has been assigned to an identified assignee other than the purchaser. (b) Purchaser's priority: other security interests. A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed other than merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if the purchaser gives new value, takes possession of each authoritative tangible copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper , and obtains control under R.S. 10:9-105 of each authoritative electronic copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper in good faith, in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party. (c) Chattel paper purchaser's priority in proceeds. Except as otherwise provided in R.S. 10:9-327, a purchaser having priority in chattel paper under Subsection (a) or (b) also has priority in proceeds of the chattel paper to the extent that: (1) R.S. 10:9-322 provides for priority in the proceeds; or (2) the proceeds consist of the specific goods covered by the chattel paper or cash proceeds of the specific goods, even if the purchaser's security interest in the proceeds is unperfected. (d) Instrument purchaser's priority. Except as otherwise provided in R.S. 10:9-331(a), a purchaser of an instrument has priority over a security interest in the instrument perfected by a method other than possession if the purchaser gives value and takes possession of the instrument in good faith and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party. (e) Holder of purchase-money security interest gives new value. For purposes of Subsections (a) and (b), the holder of a purchase-money security interest in inventory gives new value for chattel paper constituting proceeds of the inventory. (f) Indication of assignment gives knowledge. For purposes of Subsections (b) and (d) of this Section, if the authoritative copies of the record evidencing chattel paper or an instrument indicate that the chattel paper or instrument has been assigned to an identified secured party other than the purchaser, a purchaser of the chattel paper or instrument has knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party. Acts 2001, No. 128, §1, eff. July 1, 2001; Acts 2024, No. 773, §1.
Section 10:9-330Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • Undated version · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.