United States — Maine Act or statute

United States — Maine legislation

Maine Revised Statutes, Title 15, § 712: Exceptions, 1973

Certain communications interceptions, disclosures, and uses are not violations of the chapter when done by specified carrier, corrections, or jail personnel under listed conditions; carrier monito…

correctional facility monitoringtelecommunications compliance

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“Certain communications interceptions, disclosures, and uses are not violations of the chapter when done by specified carrier, corrections, or jail personnel under listed conditions; carrier monitoring limits and attorney-client privilege limits still apply.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 1973 · Source version 1 Oct 2025. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Exceptions

Certain communications interceptions, disclosures, and uses are not violations of the chapter when done by specified carrier, corrections, or jail personnel under listed conditions; carrier monitoring limits and attorney-client privilege limits still apply.

Section 712

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legislature.maine.gov · Enacted 1973 · Source version 1 Oct 2025

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Provision
§ 712ExceptionsProvision

Certain communications interceptions, disclosures, and uses are not violations of the chapter when done by specified carrier, corrections, or jail personnel under listed conditions; carrier monitoring limits and attorney-client privilege limits still apply.

1. Switchboard operators, communication common carrier agent. It is not a violation of this chapter for an operator of a switchboard or an officer, employee or agent of any communication common carrier, as defined in this chapter, to intercept, disclose or use that communication in the normal course of employment while engaged in any activity which is a necessary incident to the rendition of service or to the protection of the rights or property of the carrier of the communication, provided that the communication common carriers shall not utilize service for observing or random monitoring, except for mechanical or service quality control checks, nor shall any such officer, employee or agent use or disclose to another the contents as defined in this chapter of the communication so intercepted. [PL 1987, c. 680, §5 (NEW).] 2. Investigative officers. It is not a violation of this chapter for an investigative officer, or for another employee of the Department of Corrections authorized to exercise law enforcement powers as described in Title 34‑A, section 3011, to intercept, disclose or use that communication in the normal course of employment while engaged in any activity that is related to the administration of criminal justice as defined in Title 16, section 703, subsection 1 for the purposes of the Criminal History Record Information Act or as defined in Title 16, section 803, subsection 2 for the purposes of the Intelligence and Investigative Record Information Act; or while engaged in any activity that is related to the administration of juvenile justice if: A. Either the sender or receiver of that communication is a person residing in an adult or juvenile correctional facility administered by the Department of Corrections; and [PL 2009, c. 93, §1 (AMD).] B. Notice of the possibility of interception is provided in a way sufficient to make the parties to the communication aware of the possibility of interception, which includes: (1) Providing the resident with a written notification statement; (2) Posting written notification next to every telephone at the facility that is subject to monitoring; and (3) Informing the recipient of a telephone call from the resident by playing a recorded warning before the recipient accepts the call. [PL 1997, c. 361, §3 (AMD).] C. [PL 1997, c. 361, §3 (RP).] This subsection does not authorize any interference with the attorney-client privilege. [PL 2021, c. 365, §3 (AMD); PL 2021, c. 365, §37 (AFF).] 3. Jail investigative officer. It is not a violation of this chapter for a jail investigative officer, as defined in this chapter, or for a jail employee acting at the direction of a jail investigative officer to intercept, disclose or use that communication in the normal course of employment while engaged in any activity that is related to the administration of criminal justice as defined in Title 16, section 703, subsection 1 for the purposes of the Criminal History Record Information Act or as defined in Title 16, section 803, subsection 2 for the purposes of the Intelligence and Investigative Record Information Act if: A. Either the sender or the receiver of that communication is a person residing in an adult section of the jail; and [PL 2011, c. 507, §5 (AMD).] B. Notice of the possibility of interception is provided in a way sufficient to make the parties to the communication aware of the possibility of interception, which includes: (1) Providing the resident with a written notification statement; (2) Posting written notification next to every telephone at the jail that is subject to monitoring; and (3) Informing the recipient of a telephone call from the resident by playing a recorded warning before the recipient accepts the call. [PL 1997, c. 361, §4 (NEW).] This subsection does not authorize any interference with the attorney-client privilege. [PL 2015, c. 470, §9 (AMD).] 4. Disclosure to another state agency. It is not a violation of this chapter for the contents of an interception of any oral communication or wire communication that has been legally obtained pursuant to subsection 2 or 3 to be disclosed to a state agency if related to the statutory functions of that agency. [PL 2011, c. 507, §6 (NEW).]
Section 712Verify source

Legislative relationships

1 referenced instrument

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

A–F

1 instrument

  • Criminal History Record Information Act

    Section 712

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 1 Oct 2025 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.