United States — Maine Act or statute

United States — Maine legislation

Maine Revised Statutes, Title 26, § 781: Penalties, 1991

An employer may face civil penalties for using minors in work that violates specified child labor rules, with higher amounts for repeat violations and intentional or knowing violations.

employment complianceminor work restrictionspenalty exposure

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“An employer may face civil penalties for using minors in work that violates specified child labor rules, with higher amounts for repeat violations and intentional or knowing violations.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 1991 · Source version 1 Oct 2025. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Penalties

An employer may face civil penalties for using minors in work that violates specified child labor rules, with higher amounts for repeat violations and intentional or knowing violations.

Section 781

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legislature.maine.gov · Enacted 1991 · Source version 1 Oct 2025

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Offence
§ 781PenaltiesOffence

An employer may face civil penalties for using minors in work that violates specified child labor rules, with higher amounts for repeat violations and intentional or knowing violations.

1. Strict liability. An employer who employs, permits or suffers any minor to be employed or to work in violation of this article or Title 20‑A, section 5054 is subject to the following forfeiture or civil penalty, payable to the State and recoverable in a civil action: A. For the first violation or a violation not subject to an enhanced sanction under paragraph B or C, a forfeiture or penalty of not less than $250 nor more than $5,000; [PL 1991, c. 544, §10 (NEW).] B. For a 2nd violation occurring within 3 years of a prior adjudication, a forfeiture or penalty of not less than $500 nor more than $5,000; or [PL 1991, c. 544, §10 (NEW).] C. For a 3rd and subsequent violation occurring within 3 years of 2 or more prior adjudications, a penalty of not less than $2,000 nor more than $10,000. [RR 2009, c. 2, §72 (COR).] [RR 2009, c. 2, §72 (COR).] 1-A. De minimis violations of section 774. Notwithstanding subsection 1, absent a finding that reasonably suggests a pattern of knowing and intentional conduct, the bureau may disregard the following violations of section 774: A. A violation of the limits on the time that work may begin or end under section 774, subsection 1, paragraph F or G or section 774, subsection 2, paragraph F, as long as the violation is no greater than 10 minutes per day; [RR 2001, c. 1, §39 (COR).] B. A violation of the number of hours a minor may work in any day under section 774, subsection 1, paragraph B, C or D or section 774, subsection 2, paragraph C or D, as long as the violation is not greater than 10 minutes per day; and [PL 2001, c. 46, §1 (NEW).] C. A violation of the number of hours worked in a week under section 774, subsection 1, paragraph A or B or section 774, subsection 2, paragraph A or B, as long as the violation is not greater than 50 minutes in a week. [PL 2001, c. 46, §1 (NEW).] [RR 2001, c. 1, §39 (COR).] 2. Intentional or knowing violation of section 771, 772 or 773-A. An employer who intentionally or knowingly employs, permits or suffers any minor to be employed or to work in violation of section 771, 772 or 773‑A is subject to the following fines, payable to the State and recoverable in a civil action: A. For the first violation or a violation not subject to an enhanced sanction under paragraph B or C, a fine of not less than $500; [PL 2017, c. 286, §10 (AMD).] B. For a 2nd violation occurring within 3 years of a prior adjudication, a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $20,000; or [PL 2017, c. 286, §10 (AMD).] C. For a 3rd and subsequent violation occurring within 3 years of 2 or more prior adjudications, a fine of not less than $10,000 nor more than $50,000. [PL 2017, c. 286, §10 (AMD).] [PL 2017, c. 286, §10 (AMD).] 3. Adjudications. As used in this section, a prior adjudication includes a consent decree that contains an admission of a violation. The dates of prior adjudications for any violation or a combination of violations must precede the commission of the violation being enhanced, although prior adjudications involving a combination may have occurred on the same day. The date of any adjudication is the date the forfeiture or penalty is adjudged or the consent decree allowed, even though an appeal was taken. [PL 1991, c. 544, §10 (NEW).]
Section 781Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 1 Oct 2025 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

No legal research model is currently available.

Sign in

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.