United States — Maine Act or statute

United States — Maine legislation

Maine Revised Statutes, Title 32, § 14058: Penalties, 1991

The State may seek an injunction against violations of this chapter, and violations can trigger a $100-per-day fine, a Class E crime for certain knowing misuse of employee leasing arrangements, and payment of…

employee leasinginsurance premiumsunemployment contributions

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“The State may seek an injunction against violations of this chapter, and violations can trigger a $100-per-day fine, a Class E crime for certain knowing misuse of employee leasing arrangements, and payment of investigation or enforcement costs.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 1991 · Source version 1 Oct 2025. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Penalties

The State may seek an injunction against violations of this chapter, and violations can trigger a $100-per-day fine, a Class E crime for certain knowing misuse of employee leasing arrangements, and payment of investigation or enforcement costs.

Section 14058

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legislature.maine.gov · Enacted 1991 · Source version 1 Oct 2025

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Offence
§ 14058PenaltiesOffence

The State may seek an injunction against violations of this chapter, and violations can trigger a $100-per-day fine, a Class E crime for certain knowing misuse of employee leasing arrangements, and payment of investigation or enforcement costs.

1. Injunction. The State may seek to enjoin any person or employee leasing company from violating this chapter. [PL 1991, c. 468, §4 (NEW).] 2. Penalty. The following penalties apply to violations of this chapter. A. A person or employee leasing company that violates this chapter is subject to a fine of $100 per day for each violation. [PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. R, §10 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).] B. A corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship or other form of business entity and an officer, director, general partner, agent, representative or employee of any of those types of business entities that knowingly uses or participates in any employee leasing agreement, arrangement or mechanism for the purpose of depriving one or more insurers of premiums or avoiding the calculation of the proper contribution rate for purposes of unemployment contributions commits a Class E crime. [PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. R, §10 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).] [PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. R, §10 (RPR); PL 2003, c. 452, Pt. X, §2 (AFF).] 3. Rebuttable presumption. When an employee leasing company leases employees to only one client company and its affiliates, there is a rebuttable presumption that the client company entered into an employee leasing arrangement to avoid the calculation of the proper contribution rate for payment of unemployment contributions. [PL 1991, c. 468, §4 (NEW).] 4. Costs. Any costs incurred by the superintendent in investigating violations of or enforcing this chapter must be paid by the person or entity found to have violated this chapter. [PL 1991, c. 468, §4 (NEW).]
Section 14058Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 1 Oct 2025 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.