United States — Maine Act or statute

United States — Maine legislation

Maine Revised Statutes, Title 33, § 478: Judicial actions, 1985

Certain people may bring or intervene in actions affecting a conservation easement; the court may order termination, amendment, enforcement, or damages in limited circumstances; Attorney General records are confidential;…

confidential recordsconservation easementscourt intervention

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“Certain people may bring or intervene in actions affecting a conservation easement; the court may order termination, amendment, enforcement, or damages in limited circumstances; Attorney General records are confidential; and no comparative economic test may be used for the public-interest finding.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 1985 · Source version 1 Oct 2025. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Judicial actions

Certain people may bring or intervene in actions affecting a conservation easement; the court may order termination, amendment, enforcement, or damages in limited circumstances; Attorney General records are confidential; and no comparat…

Section 478

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legislature.maine.gov · Enacted 1985 · Source version 1 Oct 2025

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Amendment
§ 478Judicial actionsAmendment

Certain people may bring or intervene in actions affecting a conservation easement; the court may order termination, amendment, enforcement, or damages in limited circumstances; Attorney General records are confidential; and no comparative economic test may be used for the public-interest finding.

1. Action or intervention. An action affecting a conservation easement may be brought or intervened in by: A. An owner of an interest in the real property burdened by the easement; [PL 1985, c. 395, §3 (NEW).] B. A holder of the easement; [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).] C. A person having a 3rd-party right of enforcement; or [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).] D. The Attorney General; except that the Attorney General may initiate action seeking enforcement of a conservation easement only when the parties designated as having the right to do so under the terms of the conservation easement: (1) Are no longer in legal existence; (2) Are bankrupt or insolvent; (3) Cannot be contacted after reasonable diligence to do so; or (4) After 90 days' prior written notice by the Attorney General of the nature of the asserted failure, have failed to take reasonable actions to bring about compliance with the conservation easement. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).] [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).] 2. Intervention only. An action affecting a conservation easement may be intervened in by a political subdivision of the State in which the real property burdened by the easement is located, in accordance with court rules for permissive intervention. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).] 3. Power of court. The court may permit termination of a conservation easement or approve amendment to a conservation easement that materially detracts from the conservation values it serves, as provided in section 477‑A, subsection 2, paragraph B, and may enforce a conservation easement by injunction or proceeding at law and in equity. A court may deny equitable enforcement of a conservation easement only when it finds that change of circumstances has rendered that easement no longer in the public interest or no longer serving the publicly beneficial conservation purposes identified in the conservation easement. If the court so finds, the court may allow damages as the only remedy in an action to enforce the easement. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (AMD).] 4. Confidentiality of records. Documents and records obtained by the Attorney General, which would otherwise not legally be subject to public disclosure, may be shared with other public agencies but must be held as legally confidential under Title 1, section 402, unless disclosed in the course of a public proceeding in court. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).] No comparative economic test may be used to determine under this subchapter if a conservation easement is in the public interest or serves a publicly beneficial conservation purpose. [PL 2007, c. 412, §5 (NEW).]
Section 478Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 1 Oct 2025 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.