United States — Maine Act or statute

United States — Maine legislation

Maine Revised Statutes, Title 38, § 2172: Dispute resolution, 1989

If the bureau and a host community cannot agree on a host community agreement, they must use this section’s dispute process: mediation first, then arbitration if mediation fails.

appealsarbitrationcost allocationmediation

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“If the bureau and a host community cannot agree on a host community agreement, they must use this section’s dispute process: mediation first, then arbitration if mediation fails.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 1989 · Source version 1 Oct 2025. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Dispute resolution

If the bureau and a host community cannot agree on a host community agreement, they must use this section’s dispute process: mediation first, then arbitration if mediation fails.

Section 2172

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from legislature.maine.gov · Enacted 1989 · Source version 1 Oct 2025

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 1 of 1 provisions

Provision
§ 2172Dispute resolutionProvision

If the bureau and a host community cannot agree on a host community agreement, they must use this section’s dispute process: mediation first, then arbitration if mediation fails.

In the event that the bureau and a host community cannot agree on the terms of a host community agreement pursuant to section 2170‑A, the parties shall submit the dispute for resolution in accordance with this section. [PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §52 (AMD); PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §70 (AFF).] 1. Mediation. The parties shall submit the dispute for mediation. The commissioner shall present to the parties a list of 5 experienced and qualified mediators. Each party may strike 2 names from the list. After each party has been afforded 2 opportunities to strike, either the sole remaining person or the first unchallenged person on the list must be appointed by the commissioner as the mediator assigned to mediate the dispute. In assembling the list of proposed mediators, the commissioner may consider the panel of mediators offered by the Office of Court Alternative Dispute Resolution Service created in Title 4, section 18‑B. [PL 2007, c. 406, §4 (NEW).] 2. Arbitration. If mediation fails to result in an agreement between the parties, the parties shall submit the dispute for arbitration. The commissioner shall present to the parties a list of 5 experienced and qualified arbitrators. Each party may strike 2 names from the list. After each party has been afforded 2 opportunities to strike, either the sole remaining person or the first unchallenged person on the list must be appointed by the commissioner as the arbitrator assigned to determine the dispute. In assembling the list of proposed arbitrators, the commissioner may consider the panels of arbitrators offered by the Office of Court Alternative Dispute Resolution Service created in Title 4, section 18‑B or by the American Arbitration Association or its successor organization. A. Both the bureau and the host community will be bound by the decision of the arbitrator. [PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §53 (AMD); PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §70 (AFF).] B. Unless otherwise provided for in this subsection, the arbitration must be conducted in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association or its successor organization for the conduct of commercial arbitration proceedings. [PL 2007, c. 406, §4 (NEW).] C. Costs associated with the arbitration must be shared equally between the parties. [PL 2007, c. 406, §4 (NEW).] D. The arbitrator shall submit the decision to the commissioner. [PL 2007, c. 406, §4 (NEW).] E. Either party may appeal the decision of the arbitrator to the Superior Court. [PL 2007, c. 406, §4 (NEW).] [PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §53 (AMD); PL 2011, c. 655, Pt. GG, §70 (AFF).]
Section 2172Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 1 Oct 2025 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

No legal research model is currently available.

Sign in

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.