AI-assisted research summary: Temporary parenting plans must be included in temporary court orders in certain child-related cases, and they must follow specified parenting-plan rules.
Except as may be specifically provided otherwise herein, a temporary parenting plan shall be incorporated in any temporary order of the court in actions for absolute divorce, legal separation, annulment, or separate maintenance involving a minor child. A temporary parenting plan shall comply with those provisions for a permanent parenting plan under § 36-6-404(a) that are applicable for the time frame and shall include a residential schedule as described in § 36-6-404(b) . The court shall approve a temporary parenting plan as follows: If the parties can agree to a temporary parenting plan, no written temporary parenting plan is required to be entered; or If the parties cannot agree to a temporary parenting plan, either or both parties may request the court to order dispute resolution. The court may immediately order the parties to participate in dispute resolution to establish a temporary parenting plan unless one (1) of the restrictions in § 36-6-406(a) exists. If dispute resolution is not available, either party may request and the court may order an expedited hearing to establish a temporary parenting plan. In either mediation or in a hearing before the court each party shall submit a proposed temporary parenting plan and a verified statement of income as defined by chapter 5 of this title, and a verified statement that the plan is proposed in good faith and is in the best interest of the child. If only one (1) party files a proposed temporary parenting plan in compliance with this section, that party may petition the court for an order adopting that party's plan by default, upon a finding by the court that the plan is in the child's best interest. In determining whether the proposed temporary parenting plan serves the best interests of the child, the court shall be governed by the allocation of residential time and support obligations contained in the child support guidelines and related provisions in chapter 5 of this title. Acts 1997, ch. 557, § 1; T.C.A., § 36-6-407 ; Acts 2000, ch. 889, § 1. Compiler's Notes. Acts 2000, ch. 889, § 1, effective January 1, 2001, renumbered former § 36-6-403 as present § 36-6-411 and former § 36-6-407 as this section. Attorney General Opinions. A court may not order dispute resolution pursuant to T.C.A. § 36-6-403(a)(2) unless the circumstances allow the court to waive the education seminar requirement, OAG 00-178, 2000 Tenn. AG LEXIS 181 (11/20/00). NOTES TO DECISIONS 1. Construction. 2. Permanent Parenting Plan. 1. Construction. Construing T.C.A. § 36-6-403 and 36-6-404(a) in tandem, it is clear that a trial court cannot enter a temporary parenting plan concomitant with a final decree of divorce. Rigsby v. Rigsby, — S.W.3d —, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 929 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2015). 2. Permanent Parenting Plan. Trial court erred in designating a second parenting plan as the permanent parenting plan because it lacked authority to enter a “temporary” parenting plan concomitant with the parties' final decree of divorce; therefore, the temporary parenting plan entered in concomitant with the final decree had to constitute the permanent parenting plan. Rigsby v. Rigsby, — S.W.3d —, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 929 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2015).