The division must give grants to selected departments for progressive sanctions programs, prioritize certain departments, require grant applicants to submit a qualifying plan, and report to the board on the grants and program results.
Sec. 509.016. PRISON DIVERSION PROGRESSIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM. (a) The division shall provide grants to selected departments for the implementation of a system of progressive sanctions designed to reduce the revocation rate of defendants placed on community supervision. The division shall give priority in providing grants to departments that: (1) serve counties in which the revocation rate for defendants on community supervision significantly exceeds the statewide average or historically has significantly exceeded the statewide average; or (2) have demonstrated success, through the implementation of a system of progressive sanctions, in reducing the revocation rate of defendants placed on community supervision. (b) In determining which departments are proper candidates for grants under this section, the division shall give preference to departments that present to the division a plan that will target medium-risk and high-risk defendants and use progressive sanction models that adhere to the components set forth in Section 469.001, Health and Safety Code. As a condition to receiving a grant, a department must offer a plan that contains some if not all of the following components: (1) an evidence-based assessment process that includes risk and needs assessment instruments and clinical assessments that support conditions of community supervision or case management strategies; (2) reduced and specialized caseloads for supervision officers, which may include electronic monitoring or substance abuse testing of defendants; (3) the creation, designation, and fiscal support of courts and associated infrastructure necessary to increase judicial oversight and reduce revocations; (4) increased monitoring and field contact by supervision officers; (5) shortened terms of community supervision, with increased supervision during the earliest part of the term; (6) strategies that reduce the number of technical violations; (7) improved coordination between courts and departments to provide early assessment of defendant needs at the outset of supervision; (8) graduated sanctions and incentives, offered to a defendant by both the departments and courts served by the department; (9) the use of inpatient and outpatient treatment options, including substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, and cognitive and behavioral programs for defendants; (10) the use of intermediate sanctions facilities; (11) the use of community corrections beds; (12) early termination strategies and capabilities; (13) gang intervention strategies; and (14) designation of faith-based community coordinators who will develop faith-based resources, including a mentoring program. (c) The division shall, not later than December 1 of each even-numbered year, provide a report to the board. The report must state the number of departments receiving grants under this section, identify those departments by name, and describe for each department receiving a grant the components of the department's program and the success of the department in reducing revocations. The report must also contain an analysis of the scope, effectiveness, and cost benefit of programs funded by grants provided under this section and a comparison of those programs to similar programs in existence in various departments before March 1, 2005. The division may include in the report any other information the division determines will be beneficial to the board or the legislature. The board shall forward the report to the lieutenant governor and the speaker of the house of representatives not later than December 15 of each even-numbered year. Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 799 (S.B. 166), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2007.