United States — Utah Act or statute

United States — Utah legislation

Utah Code § 10-20-905, 2007

Municipalities and land use authorities must process land use applications and subdivision/warranty inspections within specified timeframes, and applicants may request written determinations and appeals;…

appealsappeals deadlinesapplication completenessapplication reviewassurance/security releasecompletion assurancedevelopment approvalsinfrastructureinfrastructure improvementsinspectioninspection deadlinesinspection timinginspectionsland useland use regulationmunicipal assurancesmunicipal noticemunicipal standardsmunicipal warrantiesnotice deadlinespermit reviewpermit/application processingpetition processingreimbursementsecurity releasesubdivision improvementswarranty releasewarranty workwarranty work deadlines

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“Municipalities and land use authorities must process land use applications and subdivision/warranty inspections within specified timeframes, and applicants may request written determinations and appeals; no money damages remedy is available.”

Use this record to locate individual provisions, understand the instrument’s recorded structure, and move from a research summary to the exact source text.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Enacted 2007. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

Subsection 10-20-905(2)

A land use authority must review complete applications and decide to approve or deny them with reasonable diligence. After a written request, it must take final action within 45 days, and it must explain any denial in writing on the record.…

Section 10-20-905(2)

Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)

The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality

Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)

04

Source and current-law status

In force source record

Source record from le.utah.gov · Enacted 2007

In force

This source records the instrument as in force. Confirm subsequent amendments, commencement notices, and judicial treatment before relying on it.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 65 of 65 provisions

Provision 65

Part 10-20-9

part 10-20-9 Administration of Land Use, Development, and Management Provisions

§ 10-20-905Review for application completeness -- Substantive application review -- Reasonable diligence required for determination of whether improvements or warranty work meets standards -- Money damages claim prohibited.Provision

Municipalities and land use authorities must process land use applications and subdivision/warranty inspections within specified timeframes, and applicants may request written determinations and appeals; no money damages remedy is available.

Review for application completeness -- Substantive application review -- Reasonable diligence required for determination of whether improvements or warranty work meets standards -- Money damages claim prohibited. Each municipality shall, in a timely manner, determine whether a land use application is complete for the purposes of subsequent, substantive land use authority review. After a reasonable period of time to allow the municipality diligently to evaluate whether all objective ordinance-based application criteria have been met, if application fees have been paid, the applicant may in writing request that the municipality provide a written determination either that the application is: complete for the purposes of allowing subsequent, substantive land use authority review; or deficient with respect to a specific, objective, ordinance-based application requirement. Within 30 days of receipt of an applicant's request under this section, the municipality shall either: mail a written notice to the applicant advising that the application is deficient with respect to a specified, objective, ordinance-based criterion, and stating that the application shall be supplemented by specific additional information identified in the notice; or accept the application as complete for the purposes of further substantive processing by the land use authority. If the notice required by Subsection (1)(c)(i) is not timely mailed, the application shall be considered complete, for purposes of further substantive land use authority review. The applicant may raise and resolve in a single appeal any determination made under this Subsection (1) to the appeal authority, including an allegation that a reasonable period of time has elapsed under Subsection (1)(b) . The appeal authority shall issue a written decision for any appeal requested under this Subsection (1)(e) . The applicant may appeal to district court the decision of the appeal authority made under Subsection (1)(e) . Each appeal under Subsection (1)(f)(i) shall be made within 30 days of the date of the written decision. Each land use authority shall substantively review a complete application and an application considered complete under Subsection (1)(d) , and shall approve or deny each application with reasonable diligence. After a reasonable period of time to allow the land use authority to consider an application, the applicant may in writing request that the land use authority take final action within 45 days from date of service of the written request. Within 45 days from the date of service of the written request described in Subsection (2)(b) : except as provided in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) , the land use authority shall take final action, approving or denying the application; and if a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body shall take final action by approving or denying the petition. If the land use authority denies an application processed under the mandates of Subsection (2)(b) , or if the applicant has requested a written decision in the application, the land use authority shall include its reasons for denial in writing, on the record, which may include the official minutes of the meeting in which the decision was rendered. If the land use authority fails to comply with Subsection (2)(c) , the applicant may appeal this failure to district court within 30 days of the date on which the land use authority is required to take final action under Subsection (2)(c) . As used in this Subsection (3) , an "infrastructure improvement category" includes: a culinary water system; a sanitary sewer system; a storm water system; a transportation system; a secondary and irrigation water system; public landscaping; or public parks, trails, or open space. With reasonable diligence, each land use authority shall determine whether the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work meets the municipality's adopted standards. An applicant may in writing request the land use authority to accept or reject the applicant's installation of required subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work. The land use authority shall accept or reject subdivision improvements within 15 days after receiving an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) , or as soon as practicable after that 15-day period if inspection of the subdivision improvements is impeded by winter weather conditions. Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c)(iv) , (3)(d), or (3)(e), the land use authority shall accept or reject the performance of warranty work within: for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and for a city of the fifth class or a town, 30 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) . If winter weather conditions do not reasonably permit a full and complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of winter weather conditions, the land use authority will require additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable. If a land use authority rejects an applicant's performance of warranty work three times, the municipality may take 15 days in addition to the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) for subsequent inspections of the applicant's warranty work. If extraordinary circumstances do not permit a land use authority to complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of the extraordinary circumstances, the land use authority requires additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the day on which the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) ends. The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality is customarily required to perform; the applicant has provided two or more written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day time period; or the land use authority is processing an unusually large number of written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) to accept or reject subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work. If a land use authority determines that the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work does not meet the municipality's adopted standards, the land use authority shall, within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority makes the determination, comprehensively and with specificity list the reasons for the land use authority's determination. If the land use authority fails to provide an applicant with the list described in Subsection (3)(f)(i) within the required time period: the applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days; and if the applicant does not receive the list within five days from the day on which the applicant provides the land use authority with written notice as described in Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A) , the applicant may demand, and the land use authority shall provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance or security for the warranty work within each infrastructure improvement category. Subject to the provisions of Section 10-20-807 : within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement and an applicant submits complete as-built drawings to the land use authority, whichever occurs later, the land use authority shall return to the applicant 90% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category; and within 15 days of the day on which the warranty period expires and the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement, the land use authority shall return to the applicant the remaining 10% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category, plus any remaining portion of a bond described in Subsection 10-20-807(5)(b) . The following acts under this Subsection (3) are administrative acts: a municipality's return of an applicant's improvement completion assurance, or any portion of an improvement completion assurance, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant; and a municipality's return of an applicant's security for an improvement warranty, or any portion of security for an improvement warranty, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant. Subject to Section 10-20-902 , nothing in this section and no action or inaction of the land use authority relieves an applicant's duty to comply with all applicable substantive ordinances and regulations. There shall be no money damages remedy arising from a claim under this section.
Section 10-20-905Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)Subsection 10-20-905(1)Provision

A municipality must timely decide whether a land use application is complete, and after the applicant has waited a reasonable period and paid fees, the applicant may request a written completeness or deficiency determination.

Each municipality shall, in a timely manner, determine whether a land use application is complete for the purposes of subsequent, substantive land use authority review. After a reasonable period of time to allow the municipality diligently to evaluate whether all objective ordinance-based application criteria have been met, if application fees have been paid, the applicant may in writing request that the municipality provide a written determination either that the application is: complete for the purposes of allowing subsequent, substantive land use authority review; or deficient with respect to a specific, objective, ordinance-based application requirement. Within 30 days of receipt of an applicant's request under this section, the municipality shall either: mail a written notice to the applicant advising that the application is deficient with respect to a specified, objective, ordinance-based criterion, and stating that the application shall be supplemented by specific additional information identified in the notice; or accept the application as complete for the purposes of further substantive processing by the land use authority. If the notice required by Subsection (1)(c)(i) is not timely mailed, the application shall be considered complete, for purposes of further substantive land use authority review. The applicant may raise and resolve in a single appeal any determination made under this Subsection (1) to the appeal authority, including an allegation that a reasonable period of time has elapsed under Subsection (1)(b) . The appeal authority shall issue a written decision for any appeal requested under this Subsection (1)(e) . The applicant may appeal to district court the decision of the appeal authority made under Subsection (1)(e) . Each appeal under Subsection (1)(f)(i) shall be made within 30 days of the date of the written decision.
Section 10-20-905(1)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(a)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(a)Provision

Each municipality must promptly decide whether a land use application is complete.

Each municipality shall, in a timely manner, determine whether a land use application is complete for the purposes of subsequent, substantive land use authority review.
Section 10-20-905(1)(a)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(b)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(b)Provision

After a reasonable period and once application fees are paid, the applicant may ask the municipality in writing for a written determination that the application is complete or deficient.

After a reasonable period of time to allow the municipality diligently to evaluate whether all objective ordinance-based application criteria have been met, if application fees have been paid, the applicant may in writing request that the municipality provide a written determination either that the application is: complete for the purposes of allowing subsequent, substantive land use authority review; or deficient with respect to a specific, objective, ordinance-based application requirement.
Section 10-20-905(1)(b)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(b)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(b)(i)Provision

complete for the purposes of allowing subsequent, substantive land use authority review; or

complete for the purposes of allowing subsequent, substantive land use authority review; or
Section 10-20-905(1)(b)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(b)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(b)(ii)Provision

deficient with respect to a specific, objective, ordinance-based application requirement.

deficient with respect to a specific, objective, ordinance-based application requirement.
Section 10-20-905(1)(b)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(c)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(c)Provision

Within 30 days after receiving an applicant’s request, the municipality must either send a deficiency notice with specified ordinance-based details or treat the application as complete.

Within 30 days of receipt of an applicant's request under this section, the municipality shall either: mail a written notice to the applicant advising that the application is deficient with respect to a specified, objective, ordinance-based criterion, and stating that the application shall be supplemented by specific additional information identified in the notice; or accept the application as complete for the purposes of further substantive processing by the land use authority.
Section 10-20-905(1)(c)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(c)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(c)(i)Provision

mail a written notice to the applicant advising that the application is deficient with respect to a specified, objective, ordinance-based criterion, and stating that the application shall be supplemented by specific additional information

mail a written notice to the applicant advising that the application is deficient with respect to a specified, objective, ordinance-based criterion, and stating that the application shall be supplemented by specific additional information identified in the notice; or
Section 10-20-905(1)(c)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(c)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(c)(ii)Provision

The land use authority must accept the application as complete for further substantive processing.

accept the application as complete for the purposes of further substantive processing by the land use authority.
Section 10-20-905(1)(c)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(d)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(d)Provision

If the notice required by Subsection (1)(c)(i) is not timely mailed, the application shall be considered complete, for purposes of further substantive land use authority review.

If the notice required by Subsection (1)(c)(i) is not timely mailed, the application shall be considered complete, for purposes of further substantive land use authority review.
Section 10-20-905(1)(d)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(e)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(e)Provision

The applicant may bring and resolve a determination in a single appeal to the appeal authority, including a claim that a reasonable time has passed. The appeal authority must issue a written decision on any appeal requested under this subsection.

The applicant may raise and resolve in a single appeal any determination made under this Subsection (1) to the appeal authority, including an allegation that a reasonable period of time has elapsed under Subsection (1)(b) . The appeal authority shall issue a written decision for any appeal requested under this Subsection (1)(e) .
Section 10-20-905(1)(e)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(e)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(e)(i)Provision

The applicant may bring and resolve multiple determinations in one appeal to the appeal authority.

The applicant may raise and resolve in a single appeal any determination made under this Subsection (1) to the appeal authority, including an allegation that a reasonable period of time has elapsed under Subsection (1)(b) .
Section 10-20-905(1)(e)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(e)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(e)(ii)Provision

The appeal authority must issue a written decision for any appeal requested under this subsection.

The appeal authority shall issue a written decision for any appeal requested under this Subsection (1)(e) .
Section 10-20-905(1)(e)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(f)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(f)Provision

An appeal to district court must be made within 30 days of the written decision.

The applicant may appeal to district court the decision of the appeal authority made under Subsection (1)(e) . Each appeal under Subsection (1)(f)(i) shall be made within 30 days of the date of the written decision.
Section 10-20-905(1)(f)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(f)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(f)(i)Provision

The applicant may appeal to district court the decision of the appeal authority made under Subsection (1)(e).

The applicant may appeal to district court the decision of the appeal authority made under Subsection (1)(e) .
Section 10-20-905(1)(f)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(1)(f)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(1)(f)(ii)Provision

Each appeal under Subsection (1)(f)(i) shall be made within 30 days of the date of the written decision.

Each appeal under Subsection (1)(f)(i) shall be made within 30 days of the date of the written decision.
Section 10-20-905(1)(f)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)Subsection 10-20-905(2)Provision

A land use authority must review complete applications and decide to approve or deny them with reasonable diligence. After a written request, it must take final action within 45 days, and it must explain any denial in writing on the record. If it misses the deadline, the applicant may appeal to district court within 30 days.

Each land use authority shall substantively review a complete application and an application considered complete under Subsection (1)(d) , and shall approve or deny each application with reasonable diligence. After a reasonable period of time to allow the land use authority to consider an application, the applicant may in writing request that the land use authority take final action within 45 days from date of service of the written request. Within 45 days from the date of service of the written request described in Subsection (2)(b) : except as provided in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) , the land use authority shall take final action, approving or denying the application; and if a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body shall take final action by approving or denying the petition. If the land use authority denies an application processed under the mandates of Subsection (2)(b) , or if the applicant has requested a written decision in the application, the land use authority shall include its reasons for denial in writing, on the record, which may include the official minutes of the meeting in which the decision was rendered. If the land use authority fails to comply with Subsection (2)(c) , the applicant may appeal this failure to district court within 30 days of the date on which the land use authority is required to take final action under Subsection (2)(c) .
Section 10-20-905(2)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(a)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(a)Provision

Each land use authority shall substantively review a complete application and an application considered complete under Subsection (1)(d) , and shall approve or deny each application with reasonable diligence.

Each land use authority shall substantively review a complete application and an application considered complete under Subsection (1)(d) , and shall approve or deny each application with reasonable diligence.
Section 10-20-905(2)(a)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(b)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(b)Provision

After a reasonable time for review, the applicant may ask the land use authority in writing to take final action within 45 days after the written request is served.

After a reasonable period of time to allow the land use authority to consider an application, the applicant may in writing request that the land use authority take final action within 45 days from date of service of the written request.
Section 10-20-905(2)(b)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(c)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(c)Provision

The land use authority must take final action on the application within 45 days after service of the written request, except as provided in Subsection (2)(c)(ii). If a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body must also take final action on the petition.

Within 45 days from the date of service of the written request described in Subsection (2)(b) : except as provided in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) , the land use authority shall take final action, approving or denying the application; and if a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body shall take final action by approving or denying the petition.
Section 10-20-905(2)(c)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(c)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(c)(i)Provision

Unless Subsection (2)(c)(ii) applies, the land use authority must take final action on the application by approving or denying it.

except as provided in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) , the land use authority shall take final action, approving or denying the application; and
Section 10-20-905(2)(c)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(c)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(c)(ii)Provision

If a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body must take final action by approving or denying the petition.

if a landowner petitions for a land use regulation, a legislative body shall take final action by approving or denying the petition.
Section 10-20-905(2)(c)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(d)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(d)Provision

If the land use authority denies an application covered by Subsection (2)(b), or the applicant asks for a written decision, the authority must give its reasons for denial in writing on the record.

If the land use authority denies an application processed under the mandates of Subsection (2)(b) , or if the applicant has requested a written decision in the application, the land use authority shall include its reasons for denial in writing, on the record, which may include the official minutes of the meeting in which the decision was rendered.
Section 10-20-905(2)(d)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(2)(e)Subsection 10-20-905(2)(e)Provision

If the land use authority fails to comply with Subsection (2)(c), the applicant may appeal to district court within 30 days.

If the land use authority fails to comply with Subsection (2)(c) , the applicant may appeal this failure to district court within 30 days of the date on which the land use authority is required to take final action under Subsection (2)(c) .
Section 10-20-905(2)(e)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)Subsection 10-20-905(3)Provision

This subsection sets deadlines and procedures for a land use authority to inspect, accept, reject, and return subdivision improvement or warranty-work security, with extensions for winter weather or extraordinary circumstances.

As used in this Subsection (3) , an "infrastructure improvement category" includes: a culinary water system; a sanitary sewer system; a storm water system; a transportation system; a secondary and irrigation water system; public landscaping; or public parks, trails, or open space. With reasonable diligence, each land use authority shall determine whether the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work meets the municipality's adopted standards. An applicant may in writing request the land use authority to accept or reject the applicant's installation of required subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work. The land use authority shall accept or reject subdivision improvements within 15 days after receiving an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) , or as soon as practicable after that 15-day period if inspection of the subdivision improvements is impeded by winter weather conditions. Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c)(iv) , (3)(d), or (3)(e), the land use authority shall accept or reject the performance of warranty work within: for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and for a city of the fifth class or a town, 30 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) . If winter weather conditions do not reasonably permit a full and complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of winter weather conditions, the land use authority will require additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable. If a land use authority rejects an applicant's performance of warranty work three times, the municipality may take 15 days in addition to the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) for subsequent inspections of the applicant's warranty work. If extraordinary circumstances do not permit a land use authority to complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of the extraordinary circumstances, the land use authority requires additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the day on which the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) ends. The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality is customarily required to perform; the applicant has provided two or more written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day time period; or the land use authority is processing an unusually large number of written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) to accept or reject subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work. If a land use authority determines that the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work does not meet the municipality's adopted standards, the land use authority shall, within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority makes the determination, comprehensively and with specificity list the reasons for the land use authority's determination. If the land use authority fails to provide an applicant with the list described in Subsection (3)(f)(i) within the required time period: the applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days; and if the applicant does not receive the list within five days from the day on which the applicant provides the land use authority with written notice as described in Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A) , the applicant may demand, and the land use authority shall provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance or security for the warranty work within each infrastructure improvement category. Subject to the provisions of Section 10-20-807 : within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement and an applicant submits complete as-built drawings to the land use authority, whichever occurs later, the land use authority shall return to the applicant 90% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category; and within 15 days of the day on which the warranty period expires and the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement, the land use authority shall return to the applicant the remaining 10% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category, plus any remaining portion of a bond described in Subsection 10-20-807(5)(b) . The following acts under this Subsection (3) are administrative acts: a municipality's return of an applicant's improvement completion assurance, or any portion of an improvement completion assurance, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant; and a municipality's return of an applicant's security for an improvement warranty, or any portion of security for an improvement warranty, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant.
Section 10-20-905(3)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)Provision

This subsection defines “infrastructure improvement category” to include several listed types of systems and public spaces.

As used in this Subsection (3) , an "infrastructure improvement category" includes: a culinary water system; a sanitary sewer system; a storm water system; a transportation system; a secondary and irrigation water system; public landscaping; or public parks, trails, or open space.
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(i)Provision

a culinary water system;

a culinary water system;
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(ii)Provision

a sanitary sewer system;

a sanitary sewer system;
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(iii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(iii)Provision

a storm water system;

a storm water system;
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(iii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(iv)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(iv)Provision

a transportation system;

a transportation system;
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(iv)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(v)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(v)Provision

a secondary and irrigation water system;

a secondary and irrigation water system;
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(v)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(vi)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(vi)Provision

public landscaping; or

public landscaping; or
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(vi)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(a)(vii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(a)(vii)Provision

public parks, trails, or open space.

public parks, trails, or open space.
Section 10-20-905(3)(a)(vii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(b)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(b)Provision

Each land use authority must, with reasonable diligence, determine whether required subdivision improvements or warranty work meet the municipality's adopted standards.

With reasonable diligence, each land use authority shall determine whether the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work meets the municipality's adopted standards.
Section 10-20-905(3)(b)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)Provision

An applicant may ask in writing for the land use authority to accept or reject subdivision improvements or warranty work, and the authority must respond within the stated deadlines.

An applicant may in writing request the land use authority to accept or reject the applicant's installation of required subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work. The land use authority shall accept or reject subdivision improvements within 15 days after receiving an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) , or as soon as practicable after that 15-day period if inspection of the subdivision improvements is impeded by winter weather conditions. Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c)(iv) , (3)(d), or (3)(e), the land use authority shall accept or reject the performance of warranty work within: for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and for a city of the fifth class or a town, 30 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) . If winter weather conditions do not reasonably permit a full and complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of winter weather conditions, the land use authority will require additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable.
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(i)Provision

An applicant may make a written request to the land use authority to accept or reject the applicant’s installation of required subdivision improvements or warranty work.

An applicant may in writing request the land use authority to accept or reject the applicant's installation of required subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work.
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(ii)Provision

The land use authority must accept or reject subdivision improvements within 15 days after receiving a written request, unless winter weather impedes inspection.

The land use authority shall accept or reject subdivision improvements within 15 days after receiving an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) , or as soon as practicable after that 15-day period if inspection of the subdivision improvements is impeded by winter weather conditions.
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)Provision

The land use authority must accept or reject warranty work within 15 days for certain city classes, and within 30 days for fifth-class cities and towns, unless other listed subsections apply.

Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c)(iv) , (3)(d), or (3)(e), the land use authority shall accept or reject the performance of warranty work within: for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and for a city of the fifth class or a town, 30 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) .
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(A)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(A)Provision

for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and

for a city of a first, second, third, or fourth class, 15 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) ; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(A)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(B)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(B)Provision

For a city of the fifth class or a town, the relevant action must occur within 30 days after the land use authority receives an applicant’s written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i).

for a city of the fifth class or a town, 30 days after the day on which the land use authority receives an applicant's written request under Subsection (3)(c)(i) .
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iii)(B)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)Provision

If winter weather prevents a full warranty-work inspection in time, the land use authority must give the applicant written notice before the deadline and finish the inspection and decision as soon as practicable.

If winter weather conditions do not reasonably permit a full and complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of winter weather conditions, the land use authority will require additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable.
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(A)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(A)Provision

The land use authority must notify the applicant in writing before the applicable time period ends if winter weather conditions will require extra time to accept or reject warranty work.

notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of winter weather conditions, the land use authority will require additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(A)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(B)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(B)Provision

An unspecified actor must finish inspecting warranty work performance and give the applicant an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable.

complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection as soon as practicable.
Section 10-20-905(3)(c)(iv)(B)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(d)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(d)Provision

If a land use authority rejects an applicant’s warranty work three times, the municipality may add 15 days for later inspections.

If a land use authority rejects an applicant's performance of warranty work three times, the municipality may take 15 days in addition to the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) for subsequent inspections of the applicant's warranty work.
Section 10-20-905(3)(d)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)Provision

If extraordinary circumstances prevent timely inspection of warranty work, the land use authority must notify the applicant in writing before the applicable time period ends and then finish the inspection and give an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after that period ends.

If extraordinary circumstances do not permit a land use authority to complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of the extraordinary circumstances, the land use authority requires additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the day on which the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) ends. The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality is customarily required to perform; the applicant has provided two or more written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day time period; or the land use authority is processing an unusually large number of written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) to accept or reject subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work.
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)Provision

If extraordinary circumstances prevent timely inspection of warranty work, the land use authority must give the applicant written notice before the deadline and must complete inspection and issue an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after that time period ends.

If extraordinary circumstances do not permit a land use authority to complete inspection of warranty work within the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii) so the land use authority is able to accept or reject the warranty work, the land use authority shall: notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of the extraordinary circumstances, the land use authority requires additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the day on which the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) ends.
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(A)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(A)Provision

The land use authority must notify the applicant in writing, before the applicable deadline, that extraordinary circumstances require more time to accept or reject the warranty work.

notify the applicant in writing before the end of the applicable time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) that, because of the extraordinary circumstances, the land use authority requires additional time to accept or reject the performance of warranty work; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(A)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(B)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(B)Provision

The responsible party must inspect warranty work and give the applicant an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the relevant time period ends.

complete the inspection of the performance of warranty work and provide the applicant with an acceptance or rejection within 30 days after the day on which the relevant time period described in Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) or (3)(c)(iii)(B) ends.
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(i)(B)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)Provision

The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality

The following situations constitute extraordinary circumstances for purposes of Subsection (3)(e)(i) : the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality is customarily required to perform; the applicant has provided two or more written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day time period; or the land use authority is processing an unusually large number of written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) to accept or reject subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work.
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(A)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(A)Provision

A land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the municipality’s customary inspection scope.

the land use authority is processing a request for inspection that substantially exceeds the normal scope of inspection the municipality is customarily required to perform;
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(A)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(B)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(B)Provision

Applies when the applicant has made two or more written requests under Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day period.

the applicant has provided two or more written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) within the same 30-day time period; or
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(B)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(C)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(C)Provision

The land use authority is processing many written requests about accepting or rejecting subdivision improvements or warranty work.

the land use authority is processing an unusually large number of written requests described in Subsection (3)(c)(i) to accept or reject subdivision improvements or performance of warranty work.
Section 10-20-905(3)(e)(ii)(C)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(f)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(f)Provision

If the land use authority finds subdivision improvements or warranty work do not meet adopted standards, it must list its reasons within 15 days.

If a land use authority determines that the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work does not meet the municipality's adopted standards, the land use authority shall, within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority makes the determination, comprehensively and with specificity list the reasons for the land use authority's determination. If the land use authority fails to provide an applicant with the list described in Subsection (3)(f)(i) within the required time period: the applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days; and if the applicant does not receive the list within five days from the day on which the applicant provides the land use authority with written notice as described in Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A) , the applicant may demand, and the land use authority shall provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance or security for the warranty work within each infrastructure improvement category.
Section 10-20-905(3)(f)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(f)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(f)(i)Provision

If a land use authority decides required subdivision improvements or warranty work do not meet municipal standards, it must list the reasons for that determination within 15 days.

If a land use authority determines that the installation of required subdivision improvements or the performance of warranty work does not meet the municipality's adopted standards, the land use authority shall, within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority makes the determination, comprehensively and with specificity list the reasons for the land use authority's determination.
Section 10-20-905(3)(f)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)Provision

If the land use authority misses the required deadline to provide a listed item, the applicant may give written notice and, if the list still is not received within five days, may demand a reimbursement of 20%.

If the land use authority fails to provide an applicant with the list described in Subsection (3)(f)(i) within the required time period: the applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days; and if the applicant does not receive the list within five days from the day on which the applicant provides the land use authority with written notice as described in Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A) , the applicant may demand, and the land use authority shall provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance or security for the warranty work within each infrastructure improvement category.
Section 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(A)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(A)Provision

The applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days.

the applicant may send written notice to the land use authority requesting the list within five days; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(A)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(B)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(B)Provision

If the applicant does not receive the list within five days after giving written notice under Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A), the applicant may demand, and the land use authority must provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant’s improvement completion assurance or security for warranty work in each infrastructure improvement category.

if the applicant does not receive the list within five days from the day on which the applicant provides the land use authority with written notice as described in Subsection (3)(f)(ii)(A) , the applicant may demand, and the land use authority shall provide, a reimbursement equal to 20% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance or security for the warranty work within each infrastructure improvement category.
Section 10-20-905(3)(f)(ii)(B)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(g)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(g)Provision

The land use authority must return 90% of an applicant’s improvement completion assurance within 15 days after the later of its compliance determination and the applicant’s submission of complete as-built drawings. It must return the remaining 10% within 15 days after the warranty period ends and compliance is determined, plus any remaining bond amount tied to Subsection 10-20-807(5)(b).

Subject to the provisions of Section 10-20-807 : within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement and an applicant submits complete as-built drawings to the land use authority, whichever occurs later, the land use authority shall return to the applicant 90% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category; and within 15 days of the day on which the warranty period expires and the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement, the land use authority shall return to the applicant the remaining 10% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category, plus any remaining portion of a bond described in Subsection 10-20-807(5)(b) .
Section 10-20-905(3)(g)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(g)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(g)(i)Provision

The land use authority must return 90% of the applicant’s improvement completion assurance for the category once the listed conditions are met, within 15 days of the later event.

within 15 days of the day on which the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement and an applicant submits complete as-built drawings to the land use authority, whichever occurs later, the land use authority shall return to the applicant 90% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(g)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(g)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(g)(ii)Provision

within 15 days of the day on which the warranty period expires and the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the

within 15 days of the day on which the warranty period expires and the land use authority determines that an infrastructure improvement within a certain infrastructure improvement category, as described in Subsection (3)(a) , meets the municipality's adopted standards for that category of infrastructure improvement, the land use authority shall return to the applicant the remaining 10% of the applicant's improvement completion assurance allocated toward that infrastructure improvement category, plus any remaining portion of a bond described in Subsection 10-20-807(5)(b) .
Section 10-20-905(3)(g)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(h)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(h)Provision

This provision says a municipality’s return of certain improvement completion assurance or improvement warranty security to the applicant is an administrative act.

The following acts under this Subsection (3) are administrative acts: a municipality's return of an applicant's improvement completion assurance, or any portion of an improvement completion assurance, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant; and a municipality's return of an applicant's security for an improvement warranty, or any portion of security for an improvement warranty, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant.
Section 10-20-905(3)(h)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(h)(i)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(h)(i)Provision

a municipality's return of an applicant's improvement completion assurance, or any portion of an improvement completion assurance, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant; and

a municipality's return of an applicant's improvement completion assurance, or any portion of an improvement completion assurance, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant; and
Section 10-20-905(3)(h)(i)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(3)(h)(ii)Subsection 10-20-905(3)(h)(ii)Provision

This text concerns a municipality returning an applicant’s improvement-warranty security, or part of it, to the applicant.

a municipality's return of an applicant's security for an improvement warranty, or any portion of security for an improvement warranty, within a category of infrastructure improvements, to the applicant.
Section 10-20-905(3)(h)(ii)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(4)Subsection 10-20-905(4)Provision

An applicant must still comply with applicable substantive ordinances and regulations.

Subject to Section 10-20-902 , nothing in this section and no action or inaction of the land use authority relieves an applicant's duty to comply with all applicable substantive ordinances and regulations.
Section 10-20-905(4)Verify source
§ 10-20-905(5)Subsection 10-20-905(5)Provision

No money damages remedy is available for a claim under this section.

There shall be no money damages remedy arising from a claim under this section.
Section 10-20-905(5)Verify source

Legislative relationships

0 referenced instruments

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

No structured legislative relationships were detected

The statute remains fully searchable by provision. Consult the source text for amendments and cross-references that have not yet been indexed.

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • Undated version · currentEnglish · In force

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.